Skip to comments.
Call the WHite HOuse to Thank Bush for CFR!!!
Posted on 12/10/2003 1:09:18 PM PST by Maceman
For what good it will do, I just called the White House switchboard (202-456-1111) and conveyed my extreme outrage at Bush for not vetoing CFR when he had the chance.
I hope you all will do the same.
BTW, the operator told me "you are not alone."
Let's shut down the WH switchboard with howls of protest.
If I wasn't still even more terrified of the Democrats than I am of the Republicans (albeit barely at this point), I would never support Bush in '04 after this.
TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: cfr
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 441-455 next last
To: Maceman
CFR stands for john mccain is an idiot and a crybaby
Comment #62 Removed by Moderator
To: Veracruz
How many office holders, nationwide, are members of the Constitution Party?
63
posted on
12/10/2003 3:49:15 PM PST
by
My2Cents
("Well....there you go again...")
To: My2Cents; Howlin; Jim Robinson
Posted by Jim Robinson to RWR8189
On News/Activism 12/04/2003 10:01:30 PM PST #11 of 201
Well, guess I can't speak for all of the Republican base, but if we don't like Bush, we can always elect Dean or Clark or Sharpton or Braun or Kucinich or Kerry or Gephardt or Lieberman, et al. Anyone for drafting Hillary Clinton? They're all highly qualified candidates. One thing for sure, we'll have to study our voter guides long and hard this election. Wouldn't want to make any mistakes. Now, you Gore voters out there, be sure not to punch the chad for Buchanan this time. Bwaahahahahahhahaha! --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks to Howlin for finding this. Rather fitting, don't you think?
64
posted on
12/10/2003 3:51:13 PM PST
by
onyx
To: Mad Dawgg
LOL!
65
posted on
12/10/2003 3:52:22 PM PST
by
Howlin
(Bush has stolen two things which Democrats believe they own by right: the presidency & the future)
Comment #66 Removed by Moderator
To: Mac The Knife
Sorry I think the fault lies with the RATS Not to mention John McCain and his ilk. I am surprised at the Supreme Court. If this is as unconstitutional as they say, how could they uphold it?
67
posted on
12/10/2003 3:52:54 PM PST
by
ladyinred
(The Left have blood on their hands!)
To: My2Cents
Anyone who sacrifices the Constitution for political gain is wrong. Simply wrong.
68
posted on
12/10/2003 3:53:02 PM PST
by
rintense
To: Veracruz
How, precisely, does the CFR "spit" on the Constitution? As I posted earlier on this thread, a "freedom of speech" argument against the CFR would seem to apply to any and all campaign finance law, of which there are many, both at the federal and state levels. I'll admit that I didn't stay up late at night pouring over the bill when it was moving through Congress or since it was signed, but this "End of the World" scenario people are trying to paint around the approval of this law seems...dare I say it?...extremist.
69
posted on
12/10/2003 3:53:25 PM PST
by
My2Cents
("Well....there you go again...")
To: My2Cents
The mere fact that an unconstitutional piece of legislation may hurt the Democrats does not justify it.
To: Maceman
I called at 1:00PM. My advice tot eh POTUS:
Be a man, admit you made a mistake and start appointing judges during the recess.
71
posted on
12/10/2003 3:54:08 PM PST
by
jwalsh07
To: Maceman
I'm about ready to forget voting for Bush in '04.
72
posted on
12/10/2003 3:54:33 PM PST
by
StoneColdGOP
(McClintock - In Your Heart, You Know He's Right)
To: My2Cents
is it perhaps possible that CFR, just maybe, actually doesn't violate the First Amendment? It's not possible. Unless by "free speech" the Founders meant "free speech, except for within 60 days of a general election and 30 days of a primary election". You think that's what they meant?
To: rintense
See my post #69. Frankly, I think the argument that the CFR "sacrifices" the Constitution is hooey. Please make your case.
74
posted on
12/10/2003 3:56:23 PM PST
by
My2Cents
("Well....there you go again...")
To: Mr. Bird
On . . . the . . . nose.
Big picture, people. Look at the big picture.
75
posted on
12/10/2003 3:57:49 PM PST
by
bdeaner
To: My2Cents
The entire basis for our republic has been changed today from the Jeffersonian ideal of equal rights for all to the Orwellian one of "some are more equal than others".
That so many here don't understand that saddens me.
76
posted on
12/10/2003 3:57:51 PM PST
by
jwalsh07
To: aristeides
You can go and read my post #69 as well. You say the CFR is unconstitutional. I don't think it is. I have Congress, the President, and the Supreme Court on my side. Who do you have?
77
posted on
12/10/2003 3:58:01 PM PST
by
My2Cents
("Well....there you go again...")
To: StoneColdGOP
I officially have, at this moment in time, decided not to vote for GW Bush.
He might as well push for and sign the Assault Weapons Ban. He cannot lose my vote twice.
This decision is permanent and non-negotiable.
78
posted on
12/10/2003 3:58:08 PM PST
by
Lazamataz
(Hillary Clinton is a CLINQUANT without the LINQA.)
Comment #79 Removed by Moderator
To: My2Cents
I believe even the majority of the Supreme Court today admitted they were limiting freedom of speech. They thought that was justified by the higher good of avoiding corruption and even the appearance of corruption. Just where does that higher good appear in the Constitution? Does this not mean that any constitutional provision can be trumped by some higher good that the courts dream up?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 441-455 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson