Posted on 12/07/2003 10:29:04 PM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection
Edited on 07/12/2004 4:11:03 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton yesterday called it "so sad" that she is being criticized as un-American for questioning Bush administration war policies while visiting troops in Iraq over the Thanksgiving holiday.
"I think that's reflective of the efforts by this administration to deny and divert attention from what everybody knows. I mean, it is like the old children's story, 'The Emperor Has No Clothes,'
(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...
missus clinton's Sunday-Circuit, pink-suited panic issus clinton failed to notice: 'living history' begets a certain symmetry. How fitting it is that the clintons were forced to reveal their inept and treasonous hand on this day, exactly 62 years after the attack on Pearl Harbor. One has to surmise from hillary clinton's Sunday-Circuit, pink-suited panic that clinton in-house polling has the missus out-polling Jane Fonda for the Tokyo-Rose prize. (Incidentally, someone ought to clue in her dresser: exculpation-by-pink-suit can work only once; notwithstanding, a treasonous middle-aged matron in a pink suit reads: "dowdy treasonous middle-aged matron in pink suit." Nothing more... nothing less....) It is common knowledge that missus clinton limits the frequency, intensity and content of her cozy clintonoid interviews of the Colmes kind. Tim Russert's (Meet the Press, NBC) stomach-turning HILLARY 2004! boosterism and nonexistent follow-ups ("And why do you suppose there aren't enough troops to fight a war, missus CLINTON?") made it clear that she had the latter two -- intensity and content -- covered today. It was frequency that did her in. Tokyo Rose also aided and abetted our enemies by using psychological warfare designed to lower the morale of our troops; and she was convicted of treason. One could easily argue that clinton's betrayal, because it is ultimately self-serving, is an even greater iniquity. And then, of course, there are the clintons' other treasonous acts.... Russert, therefore, was not only on the wrong page. He was in the wrong book.
MORE
The question isn't,
"Who in his right mind would ever want the clintons back in the Oval Office?"
The question is,--
"Who in his right mind would want the seditious, America-undermining clintons unconfined?"
(viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)
missus clinton's REAL virtual office update
http://hillarytalks.blogspot.com
http://virtualclintonlibrary.blogspot.com
http://demmemogate.blogspot.com
http://www.hillarytalks.us
http://www.hillarytalks.org
fiendsofhillary.blogspot.com
fiendsofhillary.us
fiendsofhillary.org
fraudsofhillary.com
That's because it's generally seen that her opposition is not principled opposition to intervention or a thought-out conclusion that invading Iraq was a counterproductive strategy -- it's just plain Democrat politics.
Pray for W and the Truth
Yep ! I love that one.Hitlery should be censured for her comments again the Troops boss in a war zone !! ...
Hillary to Troops: Support for War Fading
(Click here or on pic)
Remove the comma and the answer is YES!
Whoops ! Just noticed. That should be ...againST !! ...
I think mine too !
Typical move to "divert attention from what everybody knows" this bwitch said and did. This living piece of sh*t seems to have forgotten how many times her husband took his clothes off to romp in the hay with interns and other girls.
It already has been. But Im sure it doesnt resemble the original one bit.
Hey Ol' Crusty, it's called irony. Or is it projection?
Hillary's right.
We messed up calling her un-American. Our mistake and error is truly "sad."
OK, here goes...
***Hillary is a traitor Nazi/Commie!!***
Now, that is much better!!
Thanks for keeping us on our toes, Hillary!
DINO (Democrat in Name Only)
AKA
"The Enemy Within"
And I was pleased that she went to Iraq to pay tribute to our troops, and the president paid tribute to the troops, and that's appropriate."
How handy for Hillary to have this
guy tell us how she supports the troops!
(I guess Hillary couldn't get the words
out of her mouth without gagging!)
Also, very nice placement, dude, for putting
Hillary's visit to the troops before the
presidents "tribute" (Extra bonus points for this!)
Hillary should put this guy on her payroll.
Arrogant, but not unexpected. After all, this is the way things transpire in her own world, among her loyal subjects. Why should she expect things to be different in the real world?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.