Skip to comments.
Limbaugh med records seized
Posted on 12/04/2003 9:51:01 AM PST by longtermmemmory
more to follow
TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS: cantbehisfault; classenvy; clintonprosecutor; demsdirtytricks; dontblamerush; doper; doperenablers; fishingexpedition; gulliblesupporters; hewassetup; junkie; leftwingconspiracy; limbaugh; lovablefuzzball; medical; medicalrecords; palmbeachpayback; pilingon; politicalwitchunt; reductioadabsurdum; rush; rushbashing; rushisblameless; rushlimbaugh; smearcampaign; suckersforrush; talkradio; whenwasthesurgery; wildgoosechase; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280, 281-300, 301-320 ... 441-455 next last
To: pageonetoo
I did confuse the issue in making the point, but don't back off from my claim. Are you saying that what he did is OK with you, and we should overlook his RECREATIONAL DRUG USE, because WE like him? You must be a politician. I believe the person only was questioning (as I have) your statement that Rush admitted procuring drugs ILLEGALLY, which is not the case. Questioning your statement does not necessarily mean the person questioning this statement condones Rush's drug use.
To: Howlin
Howlin, you are a complete moron. You're trying as hard as you can to invent theories that you find favorable with complete indifference to whether or not they fit the facts or make any sense. You STILL haven't explained why they're just sitting on this evidence of him buying illegal drugs off of his maid while they try to gather evidence of him committing a lesser crime.
Oh, and repeating something in a larger font doesn't add to it's credibility, it just means that you're an idiot who has no other way to add weight to what he's saying.
282
posted on
12/04/2003 5:19:04 PM PST
by
Sofa King
(-I am Sofa King- tired of liberal BS! http://www.angelfire.com/art2/sofaking/index.html)
To: Dr. Scarpetta
"Not very nice language."
I reserve nice language for people who put though behind their posts.
"The truth is that Rush had something in common with Clinton. It seems that both were big risk-takers."
Amd.... what does this have to do with anything?
283
posted on
12/04/2003 5:20:35 PM PST
by
Sofa King
(-I am Sofa King- tired of liberal BS! http://www.angelfire.com/art2/sofaking/index.html)
To: longtermmemmory
>>This is VERY UNUSUAL in a prescription drug user case
I'll say....if they did this with each person in drug rehab - they'd be quite busy.
To: RebelBanker
Sorry, but. but with respect for the cya, bull! When making deposits my bank hs advised that they be under 10k so they don't have to be reported. In or out what's the difference. They either want to know where I got the $$ or where I'm taking the $$? None of their business! Rush did nothing wrong and neither did the bank that paid the fine rather than put up with the bureaucratic extortion.
To: pageonetoo
His bank paid because they were guilty of failing to report his NUMEROUS transactions,You are allowing your obvious dislike for Rush to cloud the facts.
The bank was not fined because of Rush's transactions as your statement above implies. They were fined because the bank suggested, and carried out, these type of transactions to numerous large customers. Also, Rush reported on the radio that it was 4 or 5 transactions before officials invetigating the bank questioned him about this. He immediately stopped these types of transactions.
To: joesbucks
Why should Rush give a Clintonista DA any advantage in Palm Beach before Roy Black goes in there getting the case dismissed immediately and making sure that this prosecutor is thrown out in the next election?
287
posted on
12/04/2003 5:23:57 PM PST
by
hapc
To: Timesink
In any case, it is easily possible that Rush was forced to go to four different doctors for no other reason than that the first three are either afraid of becoming WoD casualties or else are simply self-righteous pseudo-know-it-all scum. If so, that's not "doctor shopping"; it's avoiding quacks. That does happen. If that is the reason, then it is understandable to me. I am not one who is against the WOD, but I do know a little about the pain med thing. Wish I didn't.
288
posted on
12/04/2003 5:24:04 PM PST
by
ladyinred
(The Left have blood on their hands!)
To: george wythe
Do you think that National Enquirer or the maid fabricated those e-mails also? The National Enquirer fabricate something? Or course not. / sarcasm>
To: Sofa King
Top 7 ways to know that you've won and internet debate (in progress).
#1. You're accused of being 12 years old, a homosexual, or (on FR) a liberal.
Self-explanatory, and some boards (like FR) have their own little names that you can usually figure out after a short term. It's not just that they're personal attacks, they're really stupid, cliche ones. They tend to show that you're opponent doesn't even have solid enough ground to come up with more topical insults. (Note: this rule does not apply if your being a liberal, 12-year old, or homosexual is something that is actually related to the debate at hand, ie. if the debate itself is whether or not you are a liberal, their accusing you of being one does not apply)
#2. The other person starts arguing with himself rather than you.
#3. The other person develops amnesia and can't seem to remember what he posted further up the thread.
#4. Your opponent substitutes groundless accusations and personal speculation for relevant facts.
#5. Your opponent demands that you justify your claims, but refuses the responsibility to justify his own.
#6. Your opponent declares victory, randomly begins talking about how much more logical he is than you, and talks about how much he cares about the facts when you've brought more relevant facts to the debate than he has.
#7 Your opponent repeats arguments that you've already addressed instead of defending them against your response.
290
posted on
12/04/2003 5:26:32 PM PST
by
Howlin
To: longtermmemmory
I smell Janet Elnino-I believe the worthless AG under klintoon thinks she will score big if she can bring down ElRushbo.
Rush has more class in his little finger than all these liberal pukes put together.
To: Howlin
You should save space by just posting the one's you're guilty of-
#4. Your opponent substitutes groundless accusations and personal speculation for relevant facts.
#7 Your opponent repeats arguments that you've already addressed instead of defending them against your response.
292
posted on
12/04/2003 5:28:46 PM PST
by
Sofa King
(-I am Sofa King- tired of liberal BS! http://www.angelfire.com/art2/sofaking/index.html)
To: Howlin
#8 Your opponent accuses you of hanging around with old gay men.
To: deport
a law enforcement source
A police officer?
A clerk?
An eavesdropping janitor?
At this point in time I see alot of anonymous sources and speculation.
Thanks, but I'll wait for some facts before I draw any conclusions one way or another.
And, it is not illegal to withdraw any amount of money from your bank account. It just seems suspicious from the point of view of someone looking for something suspicious.
To: Sofa King
You really are too dense to realize you're guilty of the post on your own home page.
*Rolling my eyes*
295
posted on
12/04/2003 5:39:43 PM PST
by
Howlin
To: NittanyLion
I didn't accuse her of anything; she says it herself.
296
posted on
12/04/2003 5:40:09 PM PST
by
Howlin
To: Howlin
No, you just don't have an argument. If you did, you'd be making one.
297
posted on
12/04/2003 5:45:31 PM PST
by
Sofa King
(-I am Sofa King- tired of liberal BS! http://www.angelfire.com/art2/sofaking/index.html)
To: Thank You Rush
I added you to the ping list!
Thanks!
298
posted on
12/04/2003 5:47:16 PM PST
by
ConservativeMan55
(A tiger is a tiger. Some things you can't change no matter how hard you try.)
To: Howlin
LOLOL......see what happens when you point out that little fact about the emperor's clothing!!!!
299
posted on
12/04/2003 5:48:13 PM PST
by
OldFriend
(DEMS INHABIT A PARALLEL UNIVERSE)
To: OldFriend
I sure get the point. These people are no better than Sidney Blumenthal or Eleanor Clift!
300
posted on
12/04/2003 5:49:09 PM PST
by
Howlin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280, 281-300, 301-320 ... 441-455 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson