Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Limbaugh med records seized

Posted on 12/04/2003 9:51:01 AM PST by longtermmemmory

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 441-455 next last
To: pageonetoo
I did confuse the issue in making the point, but don't back off from my claim. Are you saying that what he did is OK with you, and we should overlook his RECREATIONAL DRUG USE, because WE like him?

You must be a politician. I believe the person only was questioning (as I have) your statement that Rush admitted procuring drugs ILLEGALLY, which is not the case. Questioning your statement does not necessarily mean the person questioning this statement condones Rush's drug use.

281 posted on 12/04/2003 5:16:40 PM PST by technomage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Howlin, you are a complete moron. You're trying as hard as you can to invent theories that you find favorable with complete indifference to whether or not they fit the facts or make any sense. You STILL haven't explained why they're just sitting on this evidence of him buying illegal drugs off of his maid while they try to gather evidence of him committing a lesser crime.

Oh, and repeating something in a larger font doesn't add to it's credibility, it just means that you're an idiot who has no other way to add weight to what he's saying.
282 posted on 12/04/2003 5:19:04 PM PST by Sofa King (-I am Sofa King- tired of liberal BS! http://www.angelfire.com/art2/sofaking/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 275 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Scarpetta
"Not very nice language."

I reserve nice language for people who put though behind their posts.

"The truth is that Rush had something in common with Clinton. It seems that both were big risk-takers."

Amd.... what does this have to do with anything?
283 posted on 12/04/2003 5:20:35 PM PST by Sofa King (-I am Sofa King- tired of liberal BS! http://www.angelfire.com/art2/sofaking/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 279 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
>>This is VERY UNUSUAL in a prescription drug user case

I'll say....if they did this with each person in drug rehab - they'd be quite busy.

284 posted on 12/04/2003 5:20:47 PM PST by The Raven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RebelBanker
Sorry, but. but with respect for the cya, bull! When making deposits my bank hs advised that they be under 10k so they don't have to be reported. In or out what's the difference. They either want to know where I got the $$ or where I'm taking the $$? None of their business! Rush did nothing wrong and neither did the bank that paid the fine rather than put up with the bureaucratic extortion.
285 posted on 12/04/2003 5:21:43 PM PST by wingnuts'nbolts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: pageonetoo
His bank paid because they were guilty of failing to report his NUMEROUS transactions,

You are allowing your obvious dislike for Rush to cloud the facts.

The bank was not fined because of Rush's transactions as your statement above implies. They were fined because the bank suggested, and carried out, these type of transactions to numerous large customers. Also, Rush reported on the radio that it was 4 or 5 transactions before officials invetigating the bank questioned him about this. He immediately stopped these types of transactions.

286 posted on 12/04/2003 5:23:35 PM PST by technomage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks
Why should Rush give a Clintonista DA any advantage in Palm Beach before Roy Black goes in there getting the case dismissed immediately and making sure that this prosecutor is thrown out in the next election?
287 posted on 12/04/2003 5:23:57 PM PST by hapc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
In any case, it is easily possible that Rush was forced to go to four different doctors for no other reason than that the first three are either afraid of becoming WoD casualties or else are simply self-righteous pseudo-know-it-all scum. If so, that's not "doctor shopping"; it's avoiding quacks.

That does happen. If that is the reason, then it is understandable to me. I am not one who is against the WOD, but I do know a little about the pain med thing. Wish I didn't.

288 posted on 12/04/2003 5:24:04 PM PST by ladyinred (The Left have blood on their hands!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies]

To: george wythe
Do you think that National Enquirer or the maid fabricated those e-mails also?

The National Enquirer fabricate something? Or course not. / sarcasm>

289 posted on 12/04/2003 5:25:44 PM PST by technomage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: Sofa King
Top 7 ways to know that you've won and internet debate (in progress).

#1. You're accused of being 12 years old, a homosexual, or (on FR) a liberal.

Self-explanatory, and some boards (like FR) have their own little names that you can usually figure out after a short term. It's not just that they're personal attacks, they're really stupid, cliche ones. They tend to show that you're opponent doesn't even have solid enough ground to come up with more topical insults. (Note: this rule does not apply if your being a liberal, 12-year old, or homosexual is something that is actually related to the debate at hand, ie. if the debate itself is whether or not you are a liberal, their accusing you of being one does not apply)

#2. The other person starts arguing with himself rather than you.
#3. The other person develops amnesia and can't seem to remember what he posted further up the thread.
#4. Your opponent substitutes groundless accusations and personal speculation for relevant facts.
#5. Your opponent demands that you justify your claims, but refuses the responsibility to justify his own.
#6. Your opponent declares victory, randomly begins talking about how much more logical he is than you, and talks about how much he cares about the facts when you've brought more relevant facts to the debate than he has.
#7 Your opponent repeats arguments that you've already addressed instead of defending them against your response.

290 posted on 12/04/2003 5:26:32 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 282 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
I smell Janet Elnino-I believe the worthless AG under klintoon thinks she will score big if she can bring down ElRushbo.
Rush has more class in his little finger than all these liberal pukes put together.
291 posted on 12/04/2003 5:28:35 PM PST by taillightchaser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
You should save space by just posting the one's you're guilty of-

#4. Your opponent substitutes groundless accusations and personal speculation for relevant facts.

#7 Your opponent repeats arguments that you've already addressed instead of defending them against your response.
292 posted on 12/04/2003 5:28:46 PM PST by Sofa King (-I am Sofa King- tired of liberal BS! http://www.angelfire.com/art2/sofaking/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 290 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
#8 Your opponent accuses you of hanging around with old gay men.
293 posted on 12/04/2003 5:28:56 PM PST by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 290 | View Replies]

To: deport
a law enforcement source

A police officer?
A clerk?
An eavesdropping janitor?

At this point in time I see alot of anonymous sources and speculation.

Thanks, but I'll wait for some facts before I draw any conclusions one way or another.

And, it is not illegal to withdraw any amount of money from your bank account. It just seems suspicious from the point of view of someone looking for something suspicious.
294 posted on 12/04/2003 5:39:29 PM PST by visualops
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies]

To: Sofa King
You really are too dense to realize you're guilty of the post on your own home page.

*Rolling my eyes*

295 posted on 12/04/2003 5:39:43 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion
I didn't accuse her of anything; she says it herself.
296 posted on 12/04/2003 5:40:09 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 293 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
No, you just don't have an argument. If you did, you'd be making one.
297 posted on 12/04/2003 5:45:31 PM PST by Sofa King (-I am Sofa King- tired of liberal BS! http://www.angelfire.com/art2/sofaking/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies]

To: Thank You Rush
I added you to the ping list!

Thanks!
298 posted on 12/04/2003 5:47:16 PM PST by ConservativeMan55 (A tiger is a tiger. Some things you can't change no matter how hard you try.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
LOLOL......see what happens when you point out that little fact about the emperor's clothing!!!!
299 posted on 12/04/2003 5:48:13 PM PST by OldFriend (DEMS INHABIT A PARALLEL UNIVERSE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 290 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
I sure get the point. These people are no better than Sidney Blumenthal or Eleanor Clift!
300 posted on 12/04/2003 5:49:09 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 299 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 441-455 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson