Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Some of these ideas seem quite sensible. A comfortable jet that makes the airline money will be a real seller.
1 posted on 11/18/2003 6:05:22 AM PST by jjm2111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: jjm2111
Wichita has really been trying to woo Boeing into having the Beoing Wichita plant build this plane. We could use the additional jobs to replace the thousands lost post 9/11. We've been one of the hardest hit cities primarily due to the fact we (stupidly) rely almost entirely on aircraft manufacturing.
2 posted on 11/18/2003 6:18:48 AM PST by Crazieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jjm2111
Although its main selling point has been a 20% increase in efficiency

Yowza -- that's an incredible savings: on the order of $20k per flight.

3 posted on 11/18/2003 6:22:44 AM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jjm2111
The short version can go from 200 seats in different passenger classes to 300 seats in one class?

Mooooooooo!

4 posted on 11/18/2003 6:29:42 AM PST by N. Theknow (Be a glowworm, a glowworm's never glum, cuz how can you be grumpy when the sun shines out your bum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jjm2111
Airbus says it isn't concerned.

It has always struck me as ironic that Boeing among other American plane makers made it possible for a free French and British to make the Airbus to compete with Boeing.

6 posted on 11/18/2003 6:36:20 AM PST by AxelPaulsenJr (Excellence In Posting Since 1999)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jjm2111
The inside looks similar to the Starship Enterprise corridors...
7 posted on 11/18/2003 6:39:01 AM PST by Portnoy (Fahrenheit 451...Today's Temperature is hotter than you think...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jjm2111
"Big ol Jed left the light on...."
10 posted on 11/18/2003 6:56:34 AM PST by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jjm2111
The airlines (except Southwest) won't make money until I can take my swiss army knife aboard without being shot by the brainless twits they call 'airport security'.

Also, I didn't know Boeing counting in Hex when they were numbering their aircraft designs.

11 posted on 11/18/2003 7:05:46 AM PST by zeugma (If you eat a live toad first thing in the morning, nothing worse will happen all day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jjm2111

Nothing will ever surpass the golden age of air travel - that spanned from the 70's into the early 90's. The Boeing 747 reigned supreme!


12 posted on 11/18/2003 7:06:00 AM PST by NYer ("Close your ears to the whisperings of hell and bravely oppose its onslaughts." ---St Clare Assisi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jjm2111
AMAZING! but all they had to do waws look back 30 years for good design.


15 posted on 11/18/2003 7:21:09 AM PST by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jjm2111
It appears more and more that it's a GO for Boeing to start the 7E7 project.

There are these reasons for this:

1. There is great interest from Japan Airlines, All-Nippon Airways, Singapore Airlines, Lufthansa, the airlines of the German TUI Group tour company, Continental Airlines and Delta Airlines in launching this plane.

2. The plane will most likely be built at Boeing's Everett, WA factory on the former 767 production line, which means Boeing can recall much of their laid-off workforce in the Seattle-Tacoma area.

3. The plane has a HUGE potential for sales to the US Air Force. The USAF desperately needs to phase out their aging KC-135 tanker fleet, and other 7E7 variants for the USAF may include VIP transports, electronics intelligence platforms to replace the aging RC-135's, and a combined AWACS/JSTARS battle management platform.

16 posted on 11/18/2003 7:23:12 AM PST by RayChuang88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: newgeezer
Me new bread and butter, maybe.
17 posted on 11/18/2003 7:24:09 AM PST by biblewonk (I must answer all bible questions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jjm2111
I flew the 777 three times. It is the best plane other than the L-1011 that I have been in.
18 posted on 11/18/2003 7:25:31 AM PST by bmwcyle (Hillary's election to President will start a civil war)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jjm2111
More comfortable seating is absolutely the #1 priority. Sitting for 3,4,5 or more hours is uncomfortable enough. Doing it with little wiggle room is awful.
19 posted on 11/18/2003 7:27:37 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jjm2111
Looks good! Good enough for me to want to go through a cavity search to get on? No.
20 posted on 11/18/2003 7:30:48 AM PST by null and void (Lord Hildamort!™ - She Who Must Not Be Named)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jjm2111
Wonder where they put the transporter bay?
33 posted on 11/18/2003 8:33:55 AM PST by budwiesest (Neanderthals make good judges.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jjm2111
Boeing believes passengers would be more comfortable

As if the seat-pitch engineers at America West and USAir give a rat's a**.

40 posted on 11/18/2003 9:05:01 AM PST by Charlotte Corday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jjm2111
Cathay Pacific Has Little Interest In Launching 7E7
By Lori Ranson
November 14, 2003


While the likelihood of Cathay Pacific launching Boeing's 7E7 is low, the airline's VP-Technical in the U.S., Peter Gardener, believes the airframer has "created a situation" where rival aircraft would have to "stretch out" to match the 7E7's technology, comfort and efficiency levels.

Gardener joined representatives from 80 airlines and eight financial firms in Seattle this week for what Boeing called a "progress summit" for the airplane, touring a mockup of the 7E7's interior.

Gardener said he couldn't envision his carrier opting to launch the 7E7, but in a conference call said the 3,500-nautical-mile, short-range version could be attractive to Cathay Pacific when the program is launched in 2008, barring circumstances similar to the Sept. 11 terror attacks or this year's SARS pneumonia outbreak.

Boeing's planned health-monitoring system for the 7E7 impressed Gardener, suggesting it could help carriers reach significant savings in maintenance costs. Boeing VP-7E7 Customers John Feren said the system could increase maintenance intervals once airlines collect empirical data that beat conservative fatigue estimates for aircraft fuselages normally included in new aircraft programs.

Commenting on the interior mockup, Cathay's Gardener said Boeing has stopped the "cramming effect" in bin space, and said the passenger windows were much larger.

Feren and Gardener were joined by Lufthansa's Senior VP-Corporate Fleet Program Nico Buchholz, who praised Boeing's 7E7 progress by saying the aircraft is approaching a capacity that's "acceptable" and a more suitable range.

Gardener said he'd prefer to see two engine offerings for the 7E7, and Buchholz said two would be a "nice mix," while three would be questionable.

The 7E7's fly-by-wire cockpit will feature yoke controls, Feren said but noted some airlines brought up the issue of fleet commonality regarding sidesticks. Pilots could transition from the 777 to the 7E7 cockpit in three days, Feren said.

Feren said Boeing could send out proposals with prices to carriers with estimated costs of the 7E7 shortly after the company's December board meeting, if the members give Boeing approval to formally offer the plane to customers.




I have mixed feelings , especialy if they go composite on the airframe like Airbu(tt)s.
45 posted on 11/18/2003 10:29:00 AM PST by JETDRVR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jjm2111
"Airbus says it isn't concerned. It is launching its own ambitious new aircraft called A380, a double-decker behemoth that will be the largest passenger plane ever."

I thought the FAA refused to allow double-decker airliners because of evacuation problems. Has this been changed?

46 posted on 11/18/2003 10:30:57 AM PST by nightdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jjm2111
I'm trying to remember what a 747 wieghs "Heavy"...all I know is that once they take off, they can't land without expending (or dumping) an awful lot of fuel; I understand the airframe would just break from the weight.
48 posted on 11/18/2003 11:38:40 AM PST by ErnBatavia (Taglineus Interruptus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jjm2111
Some of that old Starship Enterprise decor.

Starships have lots of room. Well, except the ones that pack the passengers into stasis tube.

49 posted on 11/18/2003 11:43:55 AM PST by RightWhale (Close your tag lines)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson