Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Does the Brain Work? [NYT says it's not "finger of God"]
The New York Times ^ | November 11, 2003 | SANDRA BLAKESLEE

Posted on 11/11/2003 6:53:38 PM PST by Brilliant

In the continuing effort to understand the human brain, the mysteries keep piling up. Consider what scientists are up against. Stretched flat, the human neocortex — the center of our higher mental functions — is about the size and thickness of a formal dinner napkin.

With 100 billion cells, each with 1,000 to 10,000 synapses, the neocortex makes roughly 100 trillion connections and contains 300 million feet of wiring packed with other tissue into a one-and-a-half-quart volume in the brain.

These cells are arranged in six very similar layers, inviting confusion. Within these layers, different regions carry out vision, hearing, touch, the sense of balance, movement, emotional responses and every other feat of cognition. More mysterious yet, there are 10 times as many feedback connections — from the neocortex to lower levels of the brain — as there are feed-forward or bottom-up connections.

Added to these mysteries is the lack of a good framework for understanding the brain's connectivity and electrochemistry. Researchers do not know how the six-layered cortical sheet gives rise to the sense of self. They have not been able to disentangle the role of genes and experience in shaping brains. They do not know how the firing of billions of loosely coupled neurons gives rise to coordinated, goal-directed behavior.

They can see trees but no forest.

They do think they have solved one longstanding mystery, though. Most neuroscientists are convinced the mind is in no way separate from the brain. In the brain they have found a physical basis for all our thoughts, aspirations, language, sense of consciousness, moral beliefs and everything else that makes us human. All of this arises from interactions among billions of ordinary cells. Neuroscience finds no duality, no finger of God animating the human mind.

So what have neuroscientists been doing? Like a child who takes apart his father's watch, they have dissected the brain and now have almost all the pieces laid out before them. There are thousands of clues about what makes the brain tick.

But how to put it back together? How to understand something so complex by examining it piecemeal? Even harder, how to integrate the different levels of analysis? Some brain events occur in fractions of milliseconds while others, like long-term memory formation, can take days or weeks. One can study molecules, ion channels, single neurons, functional areas, circuits, oscillations and chemistry. There are neural stem cells and mechanisms of plasticity, which involve how the brain changes with experience or recovers from injury.

New research tools continue to drive progress. In the late 1970's, researchers mostly placed sharp-tipped electrodes into single cells and measured firing patterns. By the 1990's, they had machines that could take images of brain activity while people spoke, read, gambled, solved moral dilemmas or, in a recent study, had orgasms.

Unfortunately, studies like these, while fascinating, tend to feed the fires of a huge disagreement within the brain sciences: is the brain made up of discrete modules that pass information among themselves? Or is it more loosely organized so that varied pockets of distant neurons fire together when called upon to perform a particular task? In mapping the brain, some researchers say that areas dedicated to aspects of language, arm movements or face recognition are hard-wired modules.

Other researchers say that such areas are surprisingly flexible. For example, the human face recognition area is where expert bird watchers distinguish features of closely related species or car experts decide if a 1958 or 1959 Plymouth had bigger fins.

While the two sides in this debate agree that the brain is prewired to some degree at birth, the nature of that prewiring is uncertain. What do genes expressed in the brain do? How do genes influence behavior? What is innate and what is flexible? What is the role of culture in shaping a brain?

While lacking a coherent framework, scientists are nevertheless making progress in mapping the correlations between brain activity and behavior. New imaging tools reveal circuits and overall patterns of activity as people solve problems or reflect on their feelings. Genes expressed in mouse brain cells are being mapped so that researchers can begin to find out if neurons that look alike have different proteins and functions. A magnetic device can knock out human brain regions, safely and temporarily, to learn what those regions do.

A lively debate continues over the nature of time in brain function. In the absence of stimulation from the outside world, neurons remain active; they are filled with electrical currents that give them a propensity to oscillate and, on interacting, create spiking patterns of activity. Do the spikes carry precise information? Or do such spikes average out over large areas? How is information carried in the brain?

One of the most exciting developments is the recent exploration of the frontal lobes. Located behind the forehead, the frontal lobes help create the social brain, melding emotions, cognition, error detection, the body, volition and an autobiographical sense of self. Special circuits containing spindle cells appear to broadcast messages — this feels right, this does not feel right — to the rest of the brain. Researchers are finding that emotions arise from body states as well as brain states, confirming that the supposed distinction between mind and body is illusory.

Others are delving into individual differences. What makes one person empathic, another mean or shy or articulate or musical? How do genes relate to temperament and how is a baby's brain constructed from early experience? Specialized cells called mirror neurons seem to help babies imitate the world to learn gestures, facial expressions, language and feelings.

Brain chemistry is no longer the study of neuromodulators as "juices" that make us feel good or awake. Substances like serotonin, dopamine and norepinephrine play crucial roles in learning, updating memories and neuropsychiatric disease.

The question of free will is on the table. Some of our behavior is conscious, but most of it is notoriously unconscious. So although we make choices, is free will mostly an illusion? And what is consciousness? In seeking an explanation, a new mystery has emerged. Many scientists now believe that the brain basically works by simulating reality. The sights, sounds and touches that flow into the brain are put in the framework of what the brain expects on the basis of previous experience and memory.

In the words of many neuroscientists, all these mysteries are terrific job security.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: brain; consciousness; god; neocortex; science
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-114 next last
One thing I've noticed lately is that scientists are going out of their way to try to disprove the existence of God through scientific means--at least if you believe the New York Times. The author states:

Neuroscience finds no duality, no finger of God animating the human mind.

That seems like a pretty gratuitous comment. We can be assured that God would not allow himself be detected by scientific means. The Bible emphasizes that Chrisitanity, for example, is a matter of faith. How therefore would a faithless scientist be able to detect the existence of God inside the human brain?

1 posted on 11/11/2003 6:53:40 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
We can be assured that God would not allow himself be detected by scientific means.

So then you agree with the author's statement?

2 posted on 11/11/2003 6:59:43 PM PST by beavus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
The very first sentence sums it up rather nicely, doesn't it?

"In the continuing effort to understand the human brain, the mysteries keep piling up."

(Though probably not in the way the author and the scientists she describes wanted.) In the end, it seems that human science has led us over the past century to nothing more and nothing less than more of God's mysteries!

3 posted on 11/11/2003 7:00:40 PM PST by Revolting cat! (Far out, man!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
How? Because King David and St. Paul say things called "the cosmological argument."
4 posted on 11/11/2003 7:04:01 PM PST by cornelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
science is in fact God's signature "gotcha"
think of it this way.....the inventor of the car,
medicine, space knowledge....did we invent this
or DISCOVER it ? The truth tables of life had to be written FIRST if we "discovered" it.
5 posted on 11/11/2003 7:06:20 PM PST by cars for sale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beavus
Actually, I agree with the express statement, but it's the implication that I find troubling. She's implying that the absence of a "finger of God" in the brain is evidence that God does not exist. Scientists should stay out of religion, and religion should separate itself from science. There is no need that the two be seen as consistent. Of course, both sides of the science/religion debate contend otherwise, and the media has apparently taken up the viewpoint of the scientists.
6 posted on 11/11/2003 7:09:09 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
The question of free will is on the table

There is no free will.

7 posted on 11/11/2003 7:16:26 PM PST by WackyKat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
Actually the article says to me that scientist's are still looking for this "finger of God" and are not necessarily giving up.

The person who wrote the article sends a signal (unconciously I believe) that she actually hopes there is no God.

8 posted on 11/11/2003 7:24:08 PM PST by right way right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
Science really can't say anything about this particular question one way or the other.

Moreover, neuroscientists really don't spend any time worrying about it. It's New York Times Science writers who ask this kind of dumb question, and naturally scientists answer as they expect the NY Times wants, so they can get a bit of publicity.

The traditional belief is that human beings consist of soul and body. In Aristotelian terms, the soul is the form of the body--which is how the Catechism of the Catholic Church also puts it. The soul (Latin "anima") is also the life of the body; when the soul departs, the body dies.

The soul is not just in the brain, in traditional belief it's coterminous with the whole body. Thus, contrary to this article, but in accordance with our own daily experience, we "feel" with other parts of our bodies as well as our brains--heart, stomach, guts. Computers don't feel in this way, and have no consciousness.

It can be presumed that the soul needs the brain in order to express itself through the body and control the body. Thus we might imagine that Terri Schiavo is fully conscious, intelligent, and aware inside of herself but unable to express any of that because brain damage cuts her soul off from proper use of her body.

You can't prove any of this scientifically, but neither can you disprove it. To say that all of human rationality and feeling is governed by the brain and the brain alone is an article of belief, not of science.
9 posted on 11/11/2003 7:28:06 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beavus
" So then you agree with the author's statement?"

Brilliance is to be found everywhere. That is evidenced by your reply.
10 posted on 11/11/2003 7:32:19 PM PST by billhilly (If you're lurking here from DU, I trust this post will make you sick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
Most neuroscientists are convinced the mind is in no way separate from the brain.

confirming that the supposed distinction between mind and body is illusory.

Is this a slippery slope?

11 posted on 11/11/2003 7:40:40 PM PST by Styria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Styria
The philosophic Mind-Problem has been solved. WoW! I must have missed that.

I wonder who solved it.

Have they solved the question of the origin of life?
I hope I didn't miss that one.
12 posted on 11/11/2003 7:53:01 PM PST by Jonah Johansen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: WackyKat
There is no free will.

If you believe that, you must live a very strange life. I'll keep my free will, thanks.

13 posted on 11/11/2003 8:02:38 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
They try to disprove God's existence, yet their discoveries of the complexity and incredible elegance of the brain defies the possibility of it arising by chance no matter how many millions of years it has had to evolve from a one celled animal, and shouts out that man, and his brain, are the handiwork of a supreme being- God.
14 posted on 11/11/2003 8:10:46 PM PST by Laserman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cars for sale
"The truth tables of life had to be written FIRST if we "discovered" it." Nice way of expressing it!

15 posted on 11/11/2003 8:11:11 PM PST by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jonah Johansen

Have they solved the question of the origin of life? I hope I didn't miss that one.

One of the Easter eggs on the Something Weird Love Cult DVD is a short student film dedicated to solving the dilema of what came first: The chicken? Or the egg?

It was pretty stupid but pretty funny. Essentially, its just a black and white film of people staring at eggs while a guy tries to convince his girlfriend/wife that its the stupidest cult she's ever dragged him to.

16 posted on 11/11/2003 8:13:11 PM PST by Duke Nukum ([T]he only true mystery is that our very lives are governed by dead people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
You couldn't help but respond the way you did-see how it works?
17 posted on 11/11/2003 8:23:08 PM PST by WackyKat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
The divine creation is so complex that the greatest human minds struggle over generations to understand it. Behind every new discovery is another mystery. And yet these creative geniuses cannot recognize the hand of a genius more creative than all of them combined. The irony is astounding.
18 posted on 11/11/2003 8:24:57 PM PST by Rocky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WackyKat
You just had to go and say that!
19 posted on 11/11/2003 8:32:03 PM PST by Hoosier-Daddy (It's a fight to the death with Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Styria
Why would it be a slippery slope? Is there a distinction between the mind and the brain? Can't one believe that and still believe in God?

I never really have understood the notion that something could be "all in your mind," psychological as opposed to physical. I can certainly see the distinction in conditions that are real as opposed to conditions that are imagined. But aren't all of our thoughts, our feelings, addictions, emotions and ideas the product of a physical process in our brains? I just don't believe something magic is happening. I think behind each one of our thoughts is some chemical/neurobiological/electrical physical process. I certainly don't know how it all works, but it's easier for me to get my head around the notion that the product of the mind is the product of physical processes of the brain rather than of some abstract magical force unknown, and I don't see this notion as being irreconcilable with a belief in God.
20 posted on 11/11/2003 8:33:02 PM PST by TKDietz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-114 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson