Ted Cruz Just Unloaded on Donald Trump

Red State ^ | January 1, 2016 | Leon H. Wolf

[Cincinatus' Wife]

It appears that the bromance between Ted Cruz and Donald Trump is probably over for good. I mean, it was one thing to see Donald Trump openly attacking Cruz for days on end. We've seen that before, and never before had Cruz taken the bait. It appears that this method of dealing with Trump has finally reached its end in the Cruz campaign.

(CRUZ): >>>I will say that it's more than a little strange to see Donald relying on as authoritative a liberal, left-wing, judicial activist Harvard Law professor who is a huge Hillary supporter (Ed. note - Laurence Tribe). It starts to make you think, "Gosh, why are some of Hillary's strongest supporters backing Trump?" You know, the last couple of elections the Democrats have gotten the nominee they wanted to run against in the general election. It seems the Hillary folks are very eager to support Donald Trump and the attacks that are being tossed my direction.<<<

Welcome to the party, Ted Cruz. Better late than never to call Trump what he is.

I, for one, am glad that the prominent conservative personalities who have been pretending Trump is a conservative and talking about him positively to bolster their ratings, will finally have to choose between their wallet and their ideology (and credibility) in this battle between Trump and Cruz. It's been a long time coming.

[elhombrelibre]

Trump should never be challenged. He’s like Obama to Obama’s supporters - a God-like figure beyond reproach or criticism.

[elhombrelibre]

Trump has never consider asking for forgiveness because he believes he’s beyond sin and predestined. He is among the elect.

[Stentor]

He is among the elect.

Retarded much?

[Cold Heat]

I have been out of college for 45 years, but today while I was perusing the internet I decided to go to Wikipedia and see what they said, however I don't always agree with it, they had the same understanding that I had based on a constitutional law class. It's not difficult to understand and it admits that the question has never been settled to the satisfaction of all points of view. Having said all that, I do believe this opinion will, if SCOTUS were to ever pick it up, be the end of the argument. "The Constitution does not define the phrase natural-born citizen, and various opinions have been offered over time regarding its precise meaning. The consensus of early 21st-century constitutional and legal scholarship, together with relevant case law, is that "natural born" comprises all people born subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, including, generally, those born in the United States, those born to U.S. citizen parents in foreign countries, and those born in other situations meeting the legal requirements for U.S. citizenship "at birth".[2] The natural-born-citizen clause has been mentioned in passing in several decisions of the United States Supreme Court, and by some lower courts that have addressed eligibility challenges, but the Supreme Court has never directly addressed the question of a specific presidential or vice-presidential candidate's eligibility as a natural-born citizen. Many eligibility lawsuits from the 2008 and 2012 election cycles were dismissed in lower courts due to the challengers' difficulty in showing that they had standing to raise legal objections. Additionally, some experts have suggested that the precise meaning of the natural-born-citizen clause may never be decided by the courts because, in the end, presidential eligibility may be determined to be a non-justiciable political question that can be decided only by Congress rather than by the judicial branch of government.[3]"

[Berlin_Freeper]

You go find it.

Lmao! You really didn't want to but after half a dozen posts I forced you to give a link.

I'm going to man up? It's you who acts like a little girl thinking I'm lying here, and you can't answer a simple question.

I didn't know if you were lying, thus I simply asked for a link to the video that you claimed was an ad.

Did you see this awkward 'weirdness' from Cruz's wife?
The give me money ad!

Now I see from your treehouse blog, a video of out-takes, inserted edits, added camera tricks and strange music... so yea you are basically full of crap. Especially considering you claimed this when I asked for a link to the ad...

Yeah I do have one. They made it.

Obviously the Cruz's did not make the video you linked. You are as much a fraud as your candidate.

I will tell you something else that is funny... you posted "Did you see this awkward 'weirdness' from Cruz's wife? " while supporting this freak candidate- Yea LOL!

When your candidate acts all Presidential mocking a handicapped person like a weird whacko, you need to stay clear from bringing up weird. Just a tip, for you drip.

But sure, I didn't doubt that the Cruz's made some kind of ad that asked for money... thus I was happy to force you to finally post a link. Wow big shock that people involved in a political campaign asked for dirty money. To you. Better get your mommy to shield your eyes, sissy little girlie.

[elhombrelibre]

No, not at all. He claims he is a Calvinist.

[RummyChick]

There are valid arguments for both sides.Scalia has indicated he thinks it might require jus soli.

The only thing I know is that it is not settled law.

[House Atreides]

Scroll down the page to see the vid of the Cruzes making political ads.
***********************************************************************
You appear to be yet another one working out of his Mommy’s basement...trolling on the internet.

[Red Steel]

Here nuts a direct link to the video. Many of you guys have screw looses in your noggins. Watch Cruzes make their weird ad.

“Whatever You Can - Cruz Your Own Adventure”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jkQz8vZ0jsU

[Fantasywriter]

Cruz’ wife looks like she means business.

[Berlin_Freeper]

In trashing the garbage link you didn’t want to post, I foced you to post a do-over second link.

Damn I’m good. :)

[Red Steel]

No Tinkerbell. Just making it more easy for you since you got a short bus. :)

[Berlin_Freeper]

Yes child’s video game, played you like a wii.

[Red Steel]

Nah, you’re part of the gang of squirrels, cruzes, chipmunks, and woodchucks who can’t find their nuts.

[Berlin_Freeper]

Whatever that means. You are the simpleton signed up with a child’s video game as a name, not me. ;)

[Red Steel]

No way. Any real, cogent review of this thread would show you Cruzie are part of the Peter Pan bus lines.

[Berlin_Freeper]

I thought you might deny you are signed on to a Conservative forum with the name of a children’s video game, but no. LoL!

[Red Steel]

It is no wonder Cruz likes the NICKelback Canadian band. He has his very own Jack NICKolson shinning/coo coo brigade.

[Berlin_Freeper]

Your childish comebacks really puts your childish name in focus.

[Red Steel]

At least my “childish” is grounded in reality. I can’t say that for you.