Posted on 05/28/2015 7:00:11 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
He said this on a conference call hosted by the Alabama GOP, which counts as one of its most honored members the leader of the anti-amnesty caucus in the U.S. Senate. Say this for Jeb: When he promised not to pander to conservatives in the name of winning the primaries, he meant it. Imagine how well received hell be on Morning Joe after he flames out of the race and does the inevitable Huntsman-esque media tour to explain how right-wing radicals stole the party from pragmatists like him.
Bush 2016: Resolute for amnesty. Theres a banner worth carrying into the general election.
And he said that he believes President Obamas executive actions to change immigration laws will be eventually ruled unconstitutional by federal courts. He reiterated that he backs a path to earned legal status, not citizenship, but earned legal status. Where people get a provisional work permit, where they pay taxes, they pay a fine, they learn English, they work, they dont receive federal government assistance and they over extended period of time they earn legal status.
Bush said he welcomed the opportunity to explain his views on both subjects because I find it interesting that people who share that view rather than stick with the view and try to persuade people about it in many cases have actually abandoned their views. I think the next president is going to have tougher times dealing with these issues than dealing with [Russian President Vladimir] Putin. If were going to bend with the wind, then itll be hard to imagine how we solve our problems.
I wonder if that shot was aimed more at Rubio, whom many pros even in Florida now think will end up bypassing Jeb nationally, or at Scott Walker, whose immigration flip-flops (replete with name-checking Sessions) have been even more shameless than Rubios. If its the former, the bit about giving up on persuading people is unfair. That was the whole point of including Rubio in the Gang of Eight: Schumer et al. thought, not irrationally, that if there was anyone who could sell a comprehensive immigration bill to the GOP base, it was the young, smooth-talking, Latino superstar from the swing state whom tea partiers had sent to the Senate two years before. If Marco Rubio cant make this happen, they figured, no one can. So Rubio tried, and not just in traditional pro-amnesty media outlets but in ones like conservative talk radio where he knew hed take flak. And he did it knowing that if he failed to persuade righties, it might cost him his chance at the nomination in 2016. Its a testament to his retail skill (and his confidence in that skill) that he was willing to accept a mission like that and able to extricate himself from it once he realized it was going nowhere such that hes now still in the top tier of GOP contenders. In fact, even after having declared his candidacy, Rubio still takes care not to distance himself too much from the Gang of Eight bill. Its not so much that hes come to think it was a mistake, its that the votes simply arent there for it in the House. Theres no use continuing to try to persuade people, he argues, if a bipartisan campaign to pass the Gang of Eight bill two years ago went nowhere. Meanwhile, behind closed doors, hes busy reminding GOP millionaires that he went to bat for them on amnesty, a wink-wink that he can be trusted to try again as president. Point being: Its not so much that Rubios less willing than Jeb is to convince people to support amnesty, its that hes smarter about when and where that persuasion should happen.
Also, since when is Jeb a model of unbending consistency on immigration reform? He supported a path to citizenship in 2012, then came out with a book in 2013 calling for a path to legal status but not citizenship (even though he knows that granting legal status to illegals will lead inexorably to citizenship), then said in an interview during the book tour that hed support a path to citizenship if one could be devised that didnt create an incentive for more illegal immigration. Wouldnt a path to legal status create an incentive too? Rest assured, if he ends up as nominee and has to compete with Hillary for Latino voters, hell come up with a way to finesse his support for legal status so that a path to citizenship in some form also ends up on the table, especially once Democrats go after his plan as de facto second-class status for illegals. The smarter position one now taken, not surprisingly, by Marco Rubio is to avoid taking citizenship off the table while emphasizing that securing the border is an absolute prerequisite to legalization of any kind. If you fight this battle on the hill of what rights should we grant to illegals?, youre fighting on Democratic turf. Fight it instead on why cant we secure our border as our first priority? Why Jeb thinks hes gaining some sort of advantage over Rubio, either in the primary or the general, by insisting on comprehensive reform instead of making a rhetorical move towards security first is baffling.
Hard to bend more when you are flat over against the ground.
No, he just blows consistently.
Was there ever a Bush that was a true conservative?
Maybe in the 1700’s.
Jebster wants to give up the rule of law and the country to fraudulently documented foreigners.
Move yourself to Mexico instead of turning this country into North Mexico.
Not the last two Bushes for sure.
First one took over a President which had got all but one state ad the in 4 years screwed it all up.
The second one gave us this mess and never fought back along with certain judges from both of them.
Our elected officials are supposed to bend to the will of the people.
Someone remind those elite dictators.
“Jeb Bush: Unlike certain Republican candidates, I dont bend with the wind on immigration”
Correct, your tone deaf 24/7.
Your right Jeb, you dont bend in the wind on this issue, you have always bent to the left and toward amnesty!
No thanks Jeb.
Cruz or lose.
Mexico is a place rich in beaury and resource. Lets just switch places. Conservatives can go there and they can come here. Then WE build a fence in New America and in 10 years, we can electrify the fence to stop Laraza from demanding the right to return after their slavery to white Democrat liberals is realized.
True. He just bends over and takes it in his transero.
I’d rather have Argentina or the Philippines.
“Was there ever a Bush that was a true conservative?”
There were two of them that CLAIMED to be conservative that became president. The first one gave away his colors so bad that he lost re-election to an incredibly flawed candidate. The second one was barely elected (i.e., not trusted in the first place), then barely re-elected (i.e., proved that the doubters were right.
On the other hand, there was ONE Republican that claimed to be conservative and actually was. He won two landslides.
So which of the two approaches do practically every leader of the Republican Party and every Republican consultant (most of them gay, by the way) ‘claim’ will win? It certainly ain’t the second.
Jeb should make like the wind and blow!
Arg fine but Phil is too smart to take us up on the offer.
We’d have PI looking like Singapore or the ROK in 15 years.
Yes, Jeb, that’s nice.
But unlike some other Robin Hoods, I can speak with an English accent.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.