Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Opinion: What if candidate Cruz catches on?
The Pocono Record ^ | March 28, 2015 | Douglas Cohn and Eleanor Clift

Posted on 03/28/2015 5:12:12 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

The voters are just getting to know the candidates running for president on the Republican side, and the months ahead will allow plenty of time to weigh their credentials and assess how they perform under pressure on the campaign trail. It will be a grueling experience for those who accept the challenge, and whoever emerges in the spring of 2016 joins the battle again in the fall against the Democratic standard-bearer.

As the first official entry into what promises to be a crowded field, Texas Senator Ted Cruz got quite a ride from the media for his announcement this week. He and his wife appeared with Matt Lauer on the “Today” show, and he was the subject of numerous profiles attempting to divine what he is all about, his motivations, and whether he is presidential material.

The early line on Cruz is that while he’s undeniably smart, even brilliant, that he has charted such a narrow path for himself on the far right of his party that he could not reach out to the rest of America should he manage to win the nomination. At Liberty University in Lynchburg, VA, founded by Rev. Jerry Falwell, Cruz told a packed auditorium of students to “Imagine” a presidency where every word of Obamacare is repealed, and where the IRS is abolished – a fantasy presidency where everything on the tea party’s wish list comes true.

It will take a whole lot of imagining to believe that Cruz could make these things come true even if he were king, let alone president. Yet he might just hit upon a theme that could catch on, that could make him the leader of the angriest wing of the GOP, the folks who cheer him for forcing the government to shut down and want him to do it again. Never mind the cost to the country, and the workers who were displaced, the shutdown put Ted Cruz in the spotlight.

We’d all like to file our taxes by postcard, but most of us realize how impractical that would be, and that it couldn’t happen unless the tax code were completely overhauled. Still, it’s the kind of idea that Cruz specializes in — totally unachievable, but sounds good.

That’s why he’s made for the tea party. He can take its obsession with a balanced budget, add a touch of sophistication, and before you know it, he’s got a proposal and a presidential platform. There’s a word for that, it’s called demagoguery, and in today’s fast-paced media environment, it could catch on, at least for a while, until the race gets serious.

That’s the bad news, but the good news is that the scrutiny will get more intense once we get past the fun and games stage of the presidential contest. That’s when it will take more than outsized ambition and ego to reach the finals of this fierce competition.

The great jurist, Oliver Wendell Holmes, said Franklin Roosevelt, who steered the country through the Depression and World War II, had a second-rate intellect but a first-rate temperament.

By that yardstick, Cruz has a ways to go. He has the intellect, but he is among the least liked members of the Senate.

Among the rest of the Republican field, there are contenders whose smarts don’t immediately jump out, and there are problematic personalities. Former Texas Governor Rick Perry is the most congenial of the candidates, and not the smartest if we count his “oops” moment in the 2008 debates. Jeb Bush was always considered the smartest of the Bush brothers, but we don’t know that much yet about his temperament. That’s what the campaign trail is for, and so the months ahead will be enlightening for the voters and for the candidates too.


TOPICS: Texas; Campaign News; Issues; Parties
KEYWORDS: 2016election; bush; defundnpr; defundpbs; douglascohn; eleanorclift; election2016; mclaughlingroup; rickperry; taxes; tedcruz; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
To: entropy12; ClearCase_guy
Senator Cruz has zero legislation passed with his sponsorship so far. But primary process is long ways away. Senator Cruz has plenty of time to woo the senators and congress critters and get a consensus going to pass some important and meaningful legislation such as abolishing the IRS.

This has always been an empty criticism of Senator Cruz, and a false comparison to what Walker has supposedly done.

How about we objectively compare the two, OK?:

Scott Walker:

Republican Governor WITH a Republican Controlled Legislature, BOTH chambers mind you.

Ted Cruz:

A Tea-Party Senator who has sponsored many, many righteous conservative bills in a Senate that, until lately, was controlled by the Democrats. Add to that a GOP-Establishment Leadership that is not conservative by any means and hates his guts, to the point of warning off campaign contributors to his Super-PAC and disparaging him whenever they can.

In short, all Walker had to do was move his wrist and sign the bills as the Chief Executive of Wisconsin, the Legislature of Wisconsin did all the heavy work of creating the bill and getting it through the congress of Wisconsin. If Walker even didn't have one GOP-Controlled chamber of the Wis. Legislature he would not have had anything to sign.

If you are going to make comparisons, please try and compare apples to apples and not Apples to Oranges.
41 posted on 03/28/2015 7:20:36 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Drew68
Cruz doesn't have a chance in hell. He's a junior senator with no executive experience, opposition from his own party, eligibility issues and he's facing off against a pre-decided candidate with a powerful last name.

Never gonna happen.


Executive Experience?

So Scott Walker signed bills that the GOP Controlled legislature did all the heavy lifting on and somehow that makes him more qualified than Ted Cruz?

You do realize there have been just as many horrible Presidents that had your vaunted "Executive Experience" and managed to destroy much of our precious individual liberties right?

Furthermore, you do realize that to date, sixteen of our Presidents were either senators or had no "Executive Experience" before they became President of the United States, many who have not only made decent Presidents but Good Presidents as well. Three senators, Warren G. Harding, John F. Kennedy, and Barack Obama moved directly from the U.S. Senate to the White House.  

(Photo: Warren G. Harding. Senate Historical Office)

-----------------------------------------------------

James Monroe

Senator, 1790-1794

President, 1817-1825

-----------------------------------------------------

John Quincy Adams

Senator, 1803-1808

President, 1825-1829

-----------------------------------------------------

Andrew Jackson

Senator, 1797-1798; 1823-1825

President, 1829-1837

-----------------------------------------------------

Martin Van Buren

Senator, 1821-1828

President, 1837-1841

-----------------------------------------------------

William Henry Harrison

Senator, 1825-1828

President, 1841

-----------------------------------------------------

John Tyler

Senator, 1827-1836

President, 1841-1845

-----------------------------------------------------

Franklin Pierce

Senator, 1837-1842

President, 1853-1857

-----------------------------------------------------

James Buchanan

Senator, 1834-1845

President, 1857-1861

-----------------------------------------------------

Andrew Johnson

Senator, 1857-1862; 1875

President, 1865-1869

-----------------------------------------------------

Benjamin Harrison

Senator, 1881-1887

President, 1889-1893

-----------------------------------------------------

Warren G. Harding

Senator, 1915-1921

President, 1921-1923

-----------------------------------------------------

Harry S. Truman

Senator, 1935-1945

President, 1945-1953

-----------------------------------------------------

John F. Kennedy

Senator, 1953-1960

President, 1961-1963

-----------------------------------------------------

Lyndon B. Johnson

Senator, 1949-1961

President, 1963-1969

-----------------------------------------------------

Richard M. Nixon

Senator, 1950-1953

President, 1969-1974

-------

Finally, he has no eligibility issues except in the minds of some crankpots.

Your supporting premises for your conclusion are laughable and without merit.

42 posted on 03/28/2015 7:35:19 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
Your supporting premises for your conclusion are laughable and without merit.

Take a breath and read it again.

43 posted on 03/28/2015 7:37:58 PM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Drew68
Take a breath and read it again.

I read it again, still reads the same way.

Help a fella out here, will ya?!
44 posted on 03/28/2015 7:42:48 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: upchuck; Kale; Jarhead9297; COUNTrecount; notaliberal; DoughtyOne; RitaOK; MountainDad; ...
Ted Cruz Ping!

If you want on/off this ping list, please let me know.

Please beware, this is a high-volume ping list!


CRUZ or LOSE!


45 posted on 03/28/2015 7:43:43 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: txhurl
Denial moving to Bargaining/Acceptance.

Well played my friend, well played...

46 posted on 03/28/2015 7:44:24 PM PDT by taildragger (It's Cruz, Pence, or Walker. Anything else is a Yugo with Racing Stripes....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
Help a fella out here, will ya?!

It was sarcasm.

Ted Cruz doesn't have a chance in hell for all the reasons I listed. Sounds familiar, doesn't it? I recall thinking the same thing about a certain junior senator from Illinois back in '07.

He didn't have a chance either.

47 posted on 03/28/2015 7:54:02 PM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

Sorry about that, apparently my “Sarcasm” Radar is on the blitz tonight. Forgive me my FRiend!


48 posted on 03/28/2015 7:55:04 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
Sorry about that, apparently my “Sarcasm” Radar is on the blitz tonight. Forgive me my Friend!

It's all good. It's Saturday night!

49 posted on 03/28/2015 7:58:31 PM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
The early line on Cruz is that while he’s undeniably smart, even brilliant, that he has charted such a narrow path for himself on the far right of his party that he could not reach out to the rest of America should he manage to win the nomination.

Bull hockey!!

50 posted on 03/28/2015 8:07:45 PM PDT by luvie (All my heroes wear camos! Thank you David, Michael, Chris, Txradioguy, JJ, CMS, & ALL Vets, too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

I somehow missed the sarcasm tag as well.


51 posted on 03/28/2015 8:11:58 PM PDT by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet




CRUZ or lose.

52 posted on 03/28/2015 8:47:57 PM PDT by onyx (PLEASE SUPPORT FR. Donate Monthly or Join Club 300! God bless you all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

Lighter than air man flight, never going to happen, so they said in the late 19th century.


53 posted on 03/28/2015 8:51:31 PM PDT by American Constitutionalist (The Keystone Pipe like Project : build it already Congress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox

LOL


54 posted on 03/28/2015 9:55:34 PM PDT by freedom6178
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

I am all in favor of senator Cruz’s agenda. Every single one of them!

Some reasons Walker is ahead of Cruz in my preference list is because Walker was fought tooth and nail by unions with nationwide help in money & people, in a blue state (WI Voted for Obama twice?) and won 3 elections in a 4 year period. No other governor has survived 2 recall elections in one term in my memory. Other reason why I keep Walker ahead of Cruz is he has ACTUAL RECORD of cutting taxes and Balancing budgets. Proven executive experience counts! And frankly in my humble opinion, Walker is more likable than Cruz.

All that said, I will celebrate if senator Cruz wins nomination and wins in general. He certainly has the skills to accomplish that. Again, IMHO, I give governor Walker a greater chance of winning in general election than senator Cruz. In my observation, Walker will face much less virulent attacks by media than Cruz. I am sure you are aware, 90% of voters are not political junkies. They do not log onto FR or read political news. Most can’t even name who the Vice President is. So I am not willing to ignore effect media has on voters.


55 posted on 03/28/2015 10:38:52 PM PDT by entropy12 (Real function of economists is to make astrologers look respectable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: entropy12
Other reason why I keep Walker ahead of Cruz is he has ACTUAL RECORD of cutting taxes and Balancing budgets. Proven executive experience counts!

And as I have been posting concerning this premise, so what?

He has a record ONLY BECAUSE he has a Republican controlled Legislature THAT IS WORKING WITH HIM!

Cruz doesn't have any of his bills passed for the EXACT OPPOSITE REASONS!

Take away the GOP Controlled Wisconsin Legislature and Walker is in the exact same boat as Cruz!

There is no there there in that point of yours.

It is an empty and non-existent comparison.
56 posted on 03/28/2015 10:56:41 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: entropy12
Some reasons Walker is ahead of Cruz in my preference list is because Walker was fought tooth and nail by unions with nationwide help in money & people

Walker has not endured a tenth of the hell being thrown at Ted Cruz.
57 posted on 03/28/2015 10:57:34 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk

He’s got to say these criminal trespassers need to be deported....all of them.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________

Well, that ain’t happening. You will not be voting at all in this Presidential Election because nobody is going to say that all 11 million illegals need to be deported. If you find a candidate who will say that, let me know.


58 posted on 03/28/2015 11:17:01 PM PDT by Din Maker (Anyone considering Gov. Susana Martinez of NM for Prez in 2016?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie; Drew68

I don’t think anyone caught the sarcasm in that. I know I sure didn’t. When I read it, it thought: “What the hell?” and just blew it off as the rantings of a closet RINO.


59 posted on 03/28/2015 11:22:36 PM PDT by Din Maker (Anyone considering Gov. Susana Martinez of NM for Prez in 2016?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
We’d all like to file our taxes by postcard, but most of us realize how impractical that would be, and that it couldn’t happen unless the tax code were completely overhauled. Still, it’s the kind of idea that Cruz specializes in — totally unachievable, but sounds good.

The person who made this statement might also make the following statement after discovering a painful boil on his/her butt:
"I guess I could see the doctor and have it lanced and packed so it would stop hurting and also heal, but that just sounds good in my head because it is totally unachievable."

60 posted on 03/29/2015 4:17:21 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson