Ted Cruz’s CPAC Televangelism
by Olivia Nuzzi
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3262124/posts
I guess the shoe fit, didn't it?
The Constitution is largely about saying
Screw 'em.
The surest way to tell how CPAC is doing is to find out what the left is say about it .. and then, you can believe the total opposite.
Since they’re all saying the conference is not good .. that should tell you that it’s REALLY GOOD .. These lefties just don’t have a clue that when they downplay our events .. it really means that the event is really good .. GOT IT ..!!
Somebody is supposed to be the adults.
Unfortunately, now, while Dems act like spoiled children....the GOPe acts like the spineless parents who want their kids and their kid's friends to like them.
Susan Milligan is a well established lefty, so her advice should be carefully listened to and then utterly disregarded.
The bottom line is that the Democrats are terrified of retribution because of their horrible ideas and programs forced on the public. So they absolutely want no, zero criticism by the Republicans.
“The Republicans, to be successful, can’t just be against things. They have to be for something”
Au contraire, Susan. The problem IS that Republicans are too prone to be FOR something—they’re for advancing the Democrat agenda, just a little slower than the Dims.
They need to be AGAINST that.
Conservatives, by contrast, are FOR: smaller government, more freedom, lower taxes, personal responsibility, less crime, safer neighborhoods, less privacy invasion and spying on citizens by government, secure borders, enforcement of our immigration laws, more employment for American citizens, voting integrity, etc., etc.
The Dims (and quite a few Republicans) are AGAINST those things.
You just have to believe in what you and FOR and AGAINST and articulate it to have a winning conservative campaign, Susan.
Sorry I could force myself to read beyond: some sensible people in the party (South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham is one of them), as I knew I would disagree with whatever she had to say.
Having been threatened with bodily harm by a pair of union goons, who I am quite certain would have broken both of my arms if I had not obeyed their orders, I'd consider this far less of a stretch than this liberal shill considers it. I also wonder why being for individual freedom, the rule of law, constitutional government, lower taxes, and honesty in government isn't being for something.
“some sensible people in the party (South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham is one of them) uttered an important truth: The Republicans, to be successful, can’t just be against things. They have to be for something, have to present a positive and innovative vision for America.”
Lindsey Graham is regularly praised by the MSM while Walker, Cruz and everyone else is constantly attacked.
All the journalists sat in the way back tapping away on their laptops while Cruz was talking. I’d look back at them every once in a while, just to see if what they looked like. Pretty humorless crowd. I don’t know if they were actually paying attention while he was speaking.
Why not both?
Sounds like there were some direct hits.
Those lefty media charges of Walker comparisons of ISIS to union protestors were never made and are zimmerizations.
Zimmered,= present tense Zimmerized= past tense Zimmerations=plural= def An agenda driven political mendacious narrative used to demean and demonize that subject’s activity or statement.
The problem is this is being repeated and attacked by some “conservative” talkshow hosts with out replaying what Walker actually said.