Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Heather Has 3 Parents
National Review Online ^ | March 12, 2003 | Stanley Kurtz

Posted on 03/12/2003 8:19:36 PM PST by Fractal Trader

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 03/12/2003 8:19:36 PM PST by Fractal Trader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Fractal Trader
Canada is becoming a cesspool.
2 posted on 03/12/2003 8:22:41 PM PST by tomahawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fractal Trader
No, no, no, no, no, a thousand times no. Just because she sleeps with the biological mother, that doesnt give her the right to be a legal parent. I GUARANTEE this will be turned down, even in Canada. You heard it here first.
3 posted on 03/12/2003 8:32:53 PM PST by Lunatic Fringe (When news breaks, we fix it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fractal Trader
Once we cross the border into legalized multiple parenthood, we have virtually arrived at the abolition of marriage and the family.

No -- we should look at the positive side of this. Once we cross the border into legalized multiple marriages, then Social Security is finished because "survivor benefits" will last in perpetuity. Every elderly person in the nation will "get married" to their grandchildren, and the Social Security checks will keep rolling in.

4 posted on 03/12/2003 8:37:36 PM PST by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fractal Trader
It takes a village.

-PJ

5 posted on 03/12/2003 8:38:14 PM PST by Political Junkie Too
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fractal Trader
Also, look for cult marriages a la Koresh. Bunches of people being "married" and having bunches of kids that they all sorta kinda take care of.

But it will all end in silliness, because the normal folks will finally get up the political will to pass a marriage law (or Constitutional amendment).

Only problem is their pristine amendment will read something like "A valid marriage contract can only be made between a single man and a single woman."

The problem with this is that there will soon come a day when a man marries a woman and one of them gets a sex change operation. Once that marriage is accepted under the marriage law someone will ask:

If those two "men" are married, why can't we two men get married?

We need a marriage law and it needs to be VERY explicit: A marriage contract is valid only when a biological male marries a biological female. The contract ceases to be valid if either or both of the parties get sex change operations.

For good measure there should be some language added suggesting that we did not separate from England and fight a Civil War so a bunch of freaks could get lower medical insurance rates.

6 posted on 03/12/2003 8:38:39 PM PST by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scripter; Remedy; EdReform
ping
7 posted on 03/12/2003 8:39:06 PM PST by I_Love_My_Husband
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fractal Trader
A real marriage, and after that, a sound family, is a personal witness of lifelong commitment, against many, many forces in society (not all of which originate from the left) which strive to tear it down. Let the state do what it may and call whatever it wishes by whatever name it chooses -- true family endures, and thrives, in the face of such adversity.
8 posted on 03/12/2003 9:05:17 PM PST by only1percent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
You know, you're right. There must be all sorts of possibilites. Business partners, for example, could just "marry" each other and reap lots of benefits. And they need not limit the "marriage" to two people. One advantage is that none of the "spouses" could be forced to testify against any of the others.
9 posted on 03/12/2003 9:25:39 PM PST by Savage Beast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: I_Love_My_Husband; *Homosexual Agenda; GrandMoM; backhoe; pram; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; ...
Thanks for the ping.

Homosexual Agenda Index
Homosexual Agenda Keyword Search
All FreeRepublic Bump Lists

10 posted on 03/12/2003 9:28:14 PM PST by scripter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Fractal Trader

11 posted on 03/12/2003 9:30:19 PM PST by Hillarys Gate Cult ("Read Hillary's hips. I never had sex with that woman.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fractal Trader
Can a kid have too many parents?
12 posted on 03/12/2003 9:46:32 PM PST by gcruse (When choosing between two evils, pick the one you haven't tried yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear
A marriage contract is valid only when a biological male marries a biological female.....the way GOD intended it to be!
13 posted on 03/12/2003 9:52:19 PM PST by GrandMoM ("Vengeance is Mine , I will repay," says the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Fractal Trader
Exodus International

International Healing Foundation

CLICK HERE

14 posted on 03/12/2003 10:36:20 PM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fractal Trader
Hmm, two lesbians for a wife...this idea has some potential.
15 posted on 03/12/2003 10:38:26 PM PST by Porterville (Screw the grammar, full posting ahead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
Not if you're in Hillary's Village.
16 posted on 03/13/2003 7:04:15 AM PST by Remedy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Fractal Trader
Hey, if two men or two women can be parents, why not 3? Or 7? Or 405? Or 280,000,000?

Afta all, eet takes a willage to raize das child. (/sinister german accent)
17 posted on 03/13/2003 10:53:50 AM PST by Antoninus (In hoc signo, vinces †)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
Praying for Canada...


18 posted on 03/13/2003 10:57:30 AM PST by Antoninus (In hoc signo, vinces †)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
It takes a village.

It's really sad to think that three villages are being deprived of idiots because of these people.

19 posted on 03/13/2003 10:57:50 AM PST by asformeandformyhouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus
A good quickie definition of Fascism is a state where everyone is part of one "big fat happy family". Where the leader is the "daddy" and "knows what"s best" for all of his little babies.

Maybe the average American is ready for such a state, but Freepers would end up becoming the angry rebellious teenagers!

20 posted on 03/13/2003 2:09:12 PM PST by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson