Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LAS VEGAS! Casino profits could go up in (no) smoke
PressAtlanticCity.com ^ | 24 September 2002 | JOE WEINERT

Posted on 09/24/2002 4:22:36 PM PDT by SheLion

LAS VEGAS - Perhaps the biggest threat to growth in the U.S. casino industry comes not from antigambling interests, but from health-conscious public officials.

A group that sets the country's indoor air-quality standards is under "enormous" pressure to make casinos and other hospitality venues smoke-free, an expert warned attendees at the Global Gaming Expo on Thursday.

"With the collapse of the tobacco industry, (?) the hospitality industry is next to come under attack," said Elia Sterling, president of Theodor Sterling Associates, an indoor air-quality firm based in Vancouver, B.C.

If the American Society of Heating, Refrigeration and Air-Conditioning Engineers, or ASHRAE, were to adopt a zero-tolerance policy for smoke particles, casinos could lose billions in revenue, according to legislative analyst Wayne Mehl of the American Gaming Association.

Forty percent to 50 percent of casino gamblers are smokers, about double the percentage of the U.S. population as a whole, Mehl said. A 1993 gaming-industry study showed that
Nevada casinos alone would have lost $1 billion in revenue if casinos were forced to go smoke-free.

"It's not just the loss of customers, but also the loss of gambling time - 12 percent less time for smokers. They would spend that time going out for a smoke," Mehl said.

Of course the casino industry is concerned about the effects of second-hand smoke on its employees, Mehl said, but Thursday's panel discussion was all about the bottom line.

The industry will get a glimpse of the possible future beginning Nov. 27,
when the three Delaware racetracks become the first casino jurisdiction to go smoke-free as part of a broader state law.

"There's a lot of talk about how much (gaming-tax) revenue the state will lose, and not only that, but jobs, too," said Don Johnson, deputy director of the Delaware State Lottery, which controls the racetrack slot-machine operations.

Delaware officials have been in touch with counterparts in Australia, where every gaming establishment was required to provide a smoke-free gaming area by Sept. 1. Johnson said he was told that the Australian smoking ban caused a sharp decrease in casino revenue initially but that business is beginning to recover.

At issue for U.S. casinos is ASHRAE Standard 62-1999, which governs how casinos, restaurants, bars and lounges filter and dilute their air to control tobacco particles, tobacco odor and body odor.

"It's intended to accommodate smoking in buildings," Sterling said. "This ASHRAE standard is a practical standard and is working well in the field."

For example, he said, the lavish Bellagio casino hotel here "provides better air quality indoors than you'll find outdoors."

Special interests, however, are aggressively pushing for standards so tight they "would effectively ban smoking in the hospitality industry," Sterling said.

ASHRAE (which conveniently rhymes with ashtray) is a 108-year-old non-government trade group of indoor-air specialists whose standards governance has been taken over by public funding and public officials, Sterling said. Today, the group's standards committee is chaired by an official from the Environmental Protection Agency and has only two representatives from the hospitality industry, he said.

"They're in the process of adopting a zero-tolerance approach to tobacco smoke. One molecule of tobacco smoke is unacceptable," Sterling said. "The debate is clearly not about health as it is about social engineering to denormalize smoking."

Matthew Iandoli, a Washington-based lobbyist and lawyer, said the Hospitality Coalition on Indoor Air Quality is trying to pre-empt the proposed new rules by adopting its own guidelines for smoke and ventilation. The group's members include the Hotel Employees and Restaurant Employees International Union, which represents more than 14,000 Atlantic City casino workers, and the Nevada Resort Association, which represents the gaming industry here.

Iandoli warned that any action, or non-action, by the hospitality industry could expose it to substantial legal damages.

"Trial lawyers are trying to find that avenue, trying to find that chink in the armor where they can pursue those class-action lawsuits," he said. "If the ASHRAE standard goes forward, that will be the point at which the lawyers will try to show that the casino industry has harmed its employees."

From the casinos' point of view, Mehl said, the "ideal" solution to shielding employees and customers from smoke is a combination of effective ventilation and smoke-free areas.

To e-mail Joe Weinert at The Press:

JWeinert@pressofac.com


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Culture/Society; Government; US: Nevada
KEYWORDS: antismokers; butts; cigarettes; individualliberty; michaeldobbs; niconazis; prohibitionists; pufflist; smokingbans; taxes; tobacco
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 301-309 next last
To: Liberal Classic
Not a loss. DU can have him back.
241 posted on 09/25/2002 4:09:46 PM PDT by Nuke'm Glowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies]

To: ThomasJefferson
You have hit it on the head. But he'll want the government to take over those businesses that would close because the ownership refuses to invoke these absurd regulations. They are already talking about that in Commiefornia. The absurdity of his posts speaks volumes. I can't wait until they come for his SUV for the benefit of "society".
242 posted on 09/25/2002 4:11:32 PM PDT by Nuke'm Glowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA
What right do you have to operate your restaurant? Your restaurant is licensed to operate in accordance with regulations set by society.

This statement assumes that rights, in this case the right to operate a business, are granted by government. That is incorrect.

Rights do not flow from government. See the Declaration of Independence for a discussion of this concept.

243 posted on 09/25/2002 4:12:45 PM PDT by Protagoras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: Rye
Good.....their are few things I despise more than sitting at the blackjack table while some 50-something multipule divorcee hag with rotting teeth, $5 dollar perfume, death breath, and a voice that's two octaves lower than it should be blows Marlboro after Marlboro in my face.

Well, why do you hang out with them!

244 posted on 09/25/2002 4:14:01 PM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
Because his government welfare check doesn't leave him enough to go to the 20 or 100 dollar tables like the rest of us.
245 posted on 09/25/2002 4:15:13 PM PDT by Nuke'm Glowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies]

To: Ditter
Actually, She Lion, restaurants *want* you to eat & leave as quickly as possible.

Not where we live. Everyone is treated like family.

246 posted on 09/25/2002 4:15:13 PM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: Crowcreek
Why -- does he smell like an ash tray?

No he doesn't smell like an ashtray! He's very articulate about himself, thank you.

Why don't you find another thread to play in and leave decent people alone.

247 posted on 09/25/2002 4:18:56 PM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: Liberal Classic
There is no law against running a bar or restaurtant as an all non-smoking establishment.

My point exactly - because there are laws forbidding someone from openning an all smoking establishment.

248 posted on 09/25/2002 4:21:33 PM PDT by Gabz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA
then you also disagree with regulations on restaurants such as those that require separation between cooking/serving areas and restrooms, employee hygiene, refrigeration standards, etc. Of course, every operator should be able to reserve any food left over from previous diners if he so desired as long as no one gets sick or injured.

In the absence of force, in this case by government, people could choose to eat at such establishments or not. If people were interested in standardization of conditions, private rating/approval services would spring up to fill the demand. The UNDERWRITERS LAB, STANDARD AND POORS, GOODHOUSEKEEPING SEAL, DUFF AND PHELPS AND INSURANCE UNDERWRITERS businesses are examples.

The government has taken those resposibilities over, at gunpoint if necessary, in the example of resturants. They do a poor job, predictably. <p.I'm glad you offered my an opportunity to introduce those to you. Civil society works better than government society based on force.

249 posted on 09/25/2002 4:22:47 PM PDT by Protagoras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA; *all
Thank God!
250 posted on 09/25/2002 4:25:54 PM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: Nuke'm Glowing
Because his government welfare check doesn't leave him enough to go to the 20 or 100 dollar tables like the rest of us.


251 posted on 09/25/2002 4:28:56 PM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA
You are perfectly able to open an entirely smoking permitted establishment anywhere. Just make it a members-only.

That may be permissible where you live but that is not allowable in the state of Delaware. And that is under the current law, even before the insidious total ban goes into effect in November.

The only exceptions there are to the Delaware Ban are for organizations running charitable fund raisers.

252 posted on 09/25/2002 4:30:06 PM PDT by Gabz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA
This discussion is about the RIGHT of government to regulate. Do you believe that government has NO right to regulate?

As explained previously, governments have no rights. Governments have power. People have rights. Try to memorize that.

253 posted on 09/25/2002 4:30:59 PM PDT by Protagoras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: Gabz
So how many businesses will the state of Delaware be taking over in November? I know I would close mine and move it.
254 posted on 09/25/2002 4:32:52 PM PDT by Nuke'm Glowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA
Perhaps you should reread the constitution!

Good advice, for yourself. Please point me to the parts of the constitution which make your point about who has rights and who has powers. Thank you

PS, I have previously asked you to direct me to the place where you said "You can look it up". I am still waiting.

255 posted on 09/25/2002 4:34:24 PM PDT by Protagoras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: Crowcreek
Are you one of those hopeless cases who can't resist lighting up where it's illegal, like the high school athletic events?

Opposing assinine regulations on business owners does not mean I am not a law abiding person.

You gave no indication this person was smoking in a non permitted location. Your indication was just that someone lit up and you grabbed the cigarette and stomped it out. While your behavior was boorish and rude, if the smoker lit up in a non-permitted location it is slightly acceptable. However, if it was a smoking permitted area you were beyond rude and totally out of line.

If so, you'd be better off staying at home, close to the TV and the ash tray.

That was an extremely out of line comment. Your boorishness suggests you might be the one who should be staying home, close to the TV.

256 posted on 09/25/2002 4:38:52 PM PDT by Gabz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: Just another Joe
These bans are not for the health of the PATRONS, they're touted as for the health of the EMPLOYEES.

And it matters not a BIT even if ALL the employees are smokers.

257 posted on 09/25/2002 4:41:24 PM PDT by Gabz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA
You are perfectly able to open an entirely smoking permitted establishment anywhere. Just make it a members-only.

I'm sorry, but you are incorrect again. It only works in some places. Most of the thugs who pass such laws also mandate what constitutes a "members only" establishment. Which is an additional problem with these rights violating laws, they require additional government intrusion to make them work.

258 posted on 09/25/2002 4:43:05 PM PDT by Protagoras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
The people in Las Vegas are not stupid enough to stop smoking in casinos.
259 posted on 09/25/2002 4:43:18 PM PDT by waterstraat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bella_Bru
The only way you can have a smoking bar in Cali is if it is owner operated.

That is what makes the Delaware law even worse than California - that even is not permitted.

Fraternal organizations (Elks, Moose, etc) Volunteer Fire Companies and Veterans Groups are theonly ones permitted to permit smoking - and only if they are conducting a fundraiser.

Of course any function at any of these locations is always a fund raiser. The increas in membership of the Moose and Elks has been unbelieveable.

260 posted on 09/25/2002 4:46:31 PM PDT by Gabz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 301-309 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson