Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Smokers Steamed Over NYC Smoking Ban
AP | Thursday, August 15, 2002 | By ERIN McCLAM

Posted on 08/15/2002 12:23:14 PM PDT by JohnHuang2

.c The Associated Press

NEW YORK (AP) - The smoke hangs thick at Pete's Tavern, swirling through the 138-year-old pub as the lunch-hour conversation turns to the mayor's plan to ban smoking in thousands of bars and restaurants across the city.

``They did it in California, but everybody out there is a health nut,'' said Phil Kraker, an accountant and a Pete's regular. ``They're out jogging at four in the morning. Those people are crazy. This is New York.''

Depending on which smoker you ask, the proposal - which must still clear the City Council - is either a personal affront or an attack on the appeal of New York itself.

Bar patrons say they should have the option of savoring a cigarette with their cocktails, especially in a city that prides itself on its independence, not to mention its nightlife.

``New York is the capital of the world,'' said Audrey Silk, founder of the smoker-rights group NYC CLASH. ``The charm of New York is our differences. Now you want to create this bland, faceless city?''

Mayor Michael Bloomberg stirred up the controversy a week ago in calling for the ban. The former smoker said bars and restaurants have to protect their employees from harmful smoke, just as they do from toxins like asbestos.

New York already outlaws smoking in restaurants with more than 35 seats, but there is no restriction against smoking in bars or the bar area of any restaurant.

A ban would cover about 13,000 establishments and would be the most visible tobacco restriction since California issued a similar rule four years ago. About 400 communities nationwide have adopted smoking bans in restaurants, according to the American Nonsmokers' Rights Foundation.

Anti-smoking groups have sided with Bloomberg, but proprietors of bars and restaurants worry his plan will chase business away with the smoke.

Gerard Meagher, who manages the Old Town Bar near Union Square, tells customers cell phones are not welcome because they disturb the friendly pub atmosphere. But he said a smoking ban would be a mistake.

``The do-gooders are winning out,'' Meagher said. ``This is people who never had a fun time trying to take all the fun out of life.''

The debate is as much about culture as health, smokers say.

``People just like a smoke with their drink,'' said Buster Smith, the white-haired manager at Pete's. ``Now they're going to have to go outside. What do they do in the rain and snow?''

They might seek refuge in private clubs, or ``smokeasies'' as one puffer described them to The New York Times. Private clubs would be exempt from the proposed ban.

Ingl Kehrens, a visitor from Amsterdam who was puffing a cigarette at Connelly's bar, questioned the logic of a ban. ``How come you sell cigarettes but you don't let people smoke them?'' he asked.

Bloomberg is trying to discourage tobacco sales, too. Earlier this year, the city hiked its cigarette tax by more than $1, sending the price of a pack to $7.50 in some places. The city says the increase cut cigarette sales nearly in half.

Legislation aimed at improving the quality of life in the nation's largest city has been a steady staple since 1994, when Rudolph Giuliani became mayor. He waged war against sex shops, panhandlers, squeegee men and even jaywalkers. But even Giuliani didn't take on smoking.

Under Bloomberg's plan, smokers who break the law may be fined $10 to $100 or be jailed up to 30 days.

City health inspectors would be responsible for enforcing a ban. There are no specific penalties for proprietors or employees.

The New York State Restaurant Association said it was reserving judgment on the plan until surveying its members.

After California's ban took effect, many proprietors complained of lost business. But supporters of the measure pointed out that tax figures have not reflected a significant drop in business, and polls showed a majority of patrons backed the ban. Johnny Stavern, a patron at Dave's Tavern near Times Square, applauded Bloomberg's proposal. ``In restaurants especially, you're there to eat and the smoke gets on everything - your clothes, your bags, everything.''

The mayor contends the ban will save employees and customers at bars and restaurants from secondhand smoke. He said an eight-hour shift for a bartender or waitress can be like smoking half a pack of cigarettes.

Smith, who has paced the floors of Pete's greeting customers for more than three decades, doesn't buy it.

``I just had an examination,'' he said, ``and my lungs are clear as a bell.''

On the Net:

Mayor's office: http://www.nyc.gov/html/om/home.html

NYC CLASH: http://www.nycclash.com


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: pufflist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
Thursday, August 15, 2002

Quote of the Day by Jhoffa

1 posted on 08/15/2002 12:23:14 PM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Bloomberg is trying to discourage tobacco sales, too. Earlier this year, the city hiked its cigarette tax by more than $1, sending the price of a pack to $7.50 in some places. The city says the increase cut cigarette sales nearly in half.

Does Bloomberg really believe that he has discouraged tobacco sales? He's just discouraged legal tobacco sales within city limits...

These NYC Republicans are a different breed.

2 posted on 08/15/2002 12:33:14 PM PDT by Isle of sanity in CA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
I have to say as a one time resident of NY, this ban will be very unpopular. People in NY smoke much more than anywhere else I have lived, and they like it.
3 posted on 08/15/2002 12:35:11 PM PDT by The Vast Right Wing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *puff_list
Index Bump
4 posted on 08/15/2002 12:48:41 PM PDT by Free the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Isle of sanity in CA
"These NYC Republicans are a different breed."

Bloomberg is a liberal. He switched parties for the sole purpose of running for mayor.

5 posted on 08/15/2002 1:57:13 PM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: The Vast Right Wing
I would think there are two actions that could be taken and either one would be effective:

1. All smokers light up anywhere at anytime - how can they jail all of them?

2. Let your wallet do the talking - stop eating out, or going to bars, tourists stop going to NYC. Bet it would only take 2-4 weeks of lost income before the businesses would be screaming for Bloomies head.

6 posted on 08/15/2002 2:03:40 PM PDT by Elkiejg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Bonaparte
Right.

EVen the pubbies here are really dems.

DEm vs Dem

Can old blumberg overtake Mccain as Rhino of the year?
7 posted on 08/15/2002 2:53:07 PM PDT by fooman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2; Just another Joe; Gabz; Great Dane; Max McGarrity; Tumbleweed_Connection; red-dawg; ...
``The do-gooders are winning out,'' Meagher said. ``This is people who never had a fun time trying to take all the fun out of life.''

The Do-Gooders could care less if they harm someone's business or not. They go in, they conquer and move on to the next town or city. I have seen this happen all across the U.S., and they aren't finished yet.

The trouble starts when our Lawmakers side with them.

8 posted on 08/15/2002 3:16:11 PM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
New York City would be a huge feather in the caps of those that are interested in taking away property rights using smoking as an avenue to further erode freedom and strengthen socialism in this country.

Hitler didn't try to change Germany all at once either. And most importantly; the Germans didn't believe that Hitler was doing a "bad" thing at the time; at least not for some time. Many Germans were still in denial until they saw the devastation with their own eyes. Many took their own lives shortly after seeing what they wouldn’t believe.

The similarities between WWII, the Third Reich, and today’s America are uncanny.

This 'do-gooder' mentality is nothing more than a morass on the lives of normal people. (That is if anyone can really be considered normal) At the very least, nannies are now and have always been a pilonidal cyst on the backsides of good people.

Ok, really, I'm done with the butt metaphors, at least for now. However, I’m still amazed at the gullibility of so many people. Does anyone still believe that the anti-smokers have anyone’s interest in mind other than their own wallet’s and controlling people different than themselves?

Intolerance is one thing but blind obedience to such an obvious control freak mentality can only be likened to cultism.
9 posted on 08/15/2002 8:19:45 PM PDT by Boomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
Dear Lord, protect us from the do-gooders. Amen.
10 posted on 08/15/2002 9:44:45 PM PDT by AF68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Elkiejg
2. Let your wallet do the talking - stop eating out, or going to bars,

That is excactly what we and other smokers have done for a year now, and we let the politicians know.

When I got a call from the Mayors PR man, he quietly said something about revisiting.

11 posted on 08/16/2002 7:09:50 AM PDT by Great Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2; Just another Joe; Gabz; Great Dane; Max McGarrity; Tumbleweed_Connection; red-dawg; ...
NYC Office of Tourism:

Toll free. 1-800-225-5697.

12 posted on 08/16/2002 7:23:19 AM PDT by Gabz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
If they go thru with this insanity it will be interesting to see how the "private clubs" that spring up to handle the smoking crowd fair. I wonder what legal actions will be used to put them out of business, equal rights for employees..health code violations, they'll have to find something. The public businesses won't accept the loss of trade and the masters won't want the bad publicity their success would bring.
13 posted on 08/16/2002 7:36:48 AM PDT by steve50
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Bonaparte
Bloomberg is a liberal. He switched parties for the sole purpose of running for mayor.

So, how did this idiot get the Republican nomination? This is what I don't understand.

Has it reached the stage where Republicans will now nominate anyone, regardless of whether they are really Republicans, so long as they don't designate themselves as Democrats?

Why is this such a worry? Because the Deomcrats gave up their principles long ago. They've become the lowest common denominator. The Democrat credo is as follows:-

"We don't believe in: work, freedom, liberty, individuality, Constitutionality.

We don't remember why our fathers and grandfathers fought in wars.

We believe in welfare, societal guilt, marginalising and ostracising "unbelievers". We believe in weakness, softness.

We eschew personal responsibility, individual and corporate ingenuity - unless it involves getting "Something For Nothing" (Registered Trademark, All Rights Reserved).

In short, we are the party of communal obligation and personal dislocation. We are for the Land of the Fettered, the People of the State.

We want your sons and your daughters and if you don't give 'em to us voluntarily, we'll be around to pick them up!!

If Republicans follow the Democrats and continue to put forward candidates like that despicable Bloomberg, we will be saying, "Goodbye, America, it was fun...for a while."

14 posted on 08/16/2002 8:31:17 AM PDT by I'm_With_Orwell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Bonaparte
re: Bloomberg switched parties...))))

I hoped he'd lose. He'll be an albatross around the neck of the GOP eventually--let a Democrat look bad after Rudy, instead of a RINO Repub.

15 posted on 08/16/2002 8:33:33 AM PDT by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Bloomberg is an idiot. I hope this crap fails.
16 posted on 08/16/2002 8:37:09 AM PDT by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve50
steve, between you and me, don't you think that the tax increase on cigarettes may have back fired in Bloombergs face, so now he wants to pay back the smokers for not feeding his coffers?

I think the states are going to catch on and clamp down on public smoking. Because they are pouting over blowing up the tax increase and turning their cash cow away.

What do you think?

17 posted on 08/16/2002 11:29:01 AM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: I'm_With_Orwell
"So, how did this idiot get the Republican nomination? This is what I don't understand."

The same way Ike, for example, elbowed Bob Taft out of the nomination in '52, just before embarking on an 8-year retreat from communism. And Taft wasn't even that conservative by then. FDR's crowning achievement was to destroy Americans' faith in their ability to weather hardship and bootstrap themselves back into prosperity. After the war, few Republicans dared to attack the New Deal and so, 20 years later, LBJ was able to expand the nanny state far beyond Roosevelt's wildest hallucinations. A few years ago, Milt Friedman pointed out that we are now 50% socialist. I'd call that an optimistic assessment.

18 posted on 08/16/2002 12:01:53 PM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
"``New York is the capital of the world,'' "

My aren't we important! Reason number 84 why upstate NY would like to break away from NYC and form a new state. Back to the topic at hand, I don't smoke but it is not my place to tell someone else they cannot. The only exception is in my home.

19 posted on 08/16/2002 12:14:51 PM PDT by Wurlitzer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
I think they're on a propaganda campaign to justify even more legislation and further tax increases. The increase in revenue isn't going to be as large as projected, so watch for the efforts on internet/reservation sales to start when they get the sheep fired up enough.

I wonder how long before childrens services are taking kids from parents who smoke around them
20 posted on 08/17/2002 5:32:10 AM PDT by steve50
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson