Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hollywood's Responsibility for Smoking Deaths
The New York Times ^ | 8/9/02 | Joe Eszterhas

Posted on 08/09/2002 11:39:02 AM PDT by GeneD

CLEVELAND — I've written 14 movies. My characters smoke in many of them, and they look cool and glamorous doing it. Smoking was an integral part of many of my screenplays because I was a militant smoker. It was part of a bad-boy image I'd cultivated for a long time — smoking, drinking, partying, rock 'n' roll.

Smoking, I once believed, was every person's right. Efforts to stop it were politically correct, a Big Brother assault on personal freedoms. Secondhand smoke was a nonexistent problem invented by professional do-gooders. I put all these views into my scripts.

In one of my movies, "Basic Instinct," smoking is part of a sexual subtext. Sharon Stone's character smokes; Michael Douglas's is trying to quit. She seduces him with literal and figurative smoke that she blows into his face. In the movie's most famous and controversial scene, she even has a cigarette in her hand.

I'm sure the tobacco companies loved "Basic Instinct." One of them even launched a brand of "Basic" cigarettes not long after the movie became a worldwide hit, perhaps inspired by my cigarette-friendly work. My movie made a lot of money; so did their new cigarette.

Remembering all this, I find it hard to forgive myself. I have been an accomplice to the murders of untold numbers of human beings. I am admitting this only because I have made a deal with God. Spare me, I said, and I will try to stop others from committing the same crimes I did.

Eighteen months ago I was diagnosed with throat cancer, the result of a lifetime of smoking. I am alive but maimed. Much of my larynx is gone. I have some difficulty speaking; others have some difficulty understanding me. I no longer have the excruciating difficulty swallowing or breathing that I experienced in the first months after my surgery.

I haven't smoked or drank for 18 months now, though I still take it day-to-day and pray for help. I believe in prayer and exercise. I have walked five miles a day for a year, without missing even one day. Quitting smoking and drinking has taught me the hardest lesson I've ever learned about my own weakness; it has also given me the greatest affection and empathy for those still addicted.

I have spent some time in the past year and a half in cancer wards. I have seen people gasp for air as a suctioning device cleaned their tracheas. I have heard myself wheezing horribly, unable to catch my breath, as a nurse begged me to breathe. I have seen an 18-year-old with throat cancer who had never smoked a single cigarette in his life. (His mother was a chain smoker.) I have tried not to cry as my wife fitted the trachea tube that I had coughed out back into my throat. (Thankfully, I no longer need it.)

I don't think smoking is every person's right anymore. I think smoking should be as illegal as heroin. I'm no longer such a bad boy. I go to church on Sunday. I'm desperate to see my four boys grow up. I want to do everything I can to undo the damage I have done with my own big-screen words and images.

So I say to my colleagues in Hollywood: what we are doing by showing larger-than-life movie stars smoking onscreen is glamorizing smoking. What we are doing by glamorizing smoking is unconscionable.

Hollywood films have long championed civil rights and gay rights and commonly call for an end to racism and intolerance. Hollywood films espouse a belief in goodness and redemption. Yet we are the advertising agency and sales force for an industry that kills nearly 10,000 people daily.

A cigarette in the hands of a Hollywood star onscreen is a gun aimed at a 12- or 14-year-old. (I was 12 when I started to smoke, a geeky immigrant kid who wanted so very much to be cool.) The gun will go off when that kid is an adult. We in Hollywood know the gun will go off, yet we hide behind a smoke screen of phrases like "creative freedom" and "artistic expression." Those lofty words are lies designed, at best, to obscure laziness. I know. I have told those lies. The truth is that there are 1,000 better and more original ways to reveal a character's personality.

Screenwriters know, too, that some movie stars are more likely to play a part if they can smoke — because they are so addicted to smoking that they have difficulty stopping even during the shooting of a scene. The screenwriter writing smoking scenes for the smoking star is part of a vicious and deadly circle.

My hands are bloody; so are Hollywood's. My cancer has caused me to attempt to cleanse mine. I don't wish my fate upon anyone in Hollywood, but I beg that Hollywood stop imposing it upon millions of others.

Joe Eszterhas is a screenwriter and the author of "American Rhapsody."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cancer; cigarettes; hollywood; motionpictures; pufflist; smoking
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
You know Joe, I could say something about your moral obtuseness -- after all, anyone saying that Hollywood is responsible for more than smoking you'd label a NAZ -- a conservative, but we'll let it pass. Your famous and controversial scene is another thing. You seem a brave man, Joe: could you describe that scene for us -- in detail?

P. S. I think you're boasting about Basic cigarettes. Anyone know when they were introduced?

1 posted on 08/09/2002 11:39:02 AM PDT by GeneD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GeneD
Liberal soul-searching always has this quality of being highly selective. Joe would never blame himself for contributing to higher rates of Aids and other STD's by glamorizing promiscuity and perversion in his movies, but CIGARETTE SMOKING! Ah, that's the great evil.
2 posted on 08/09/2002 11:45:25 AM PDT by Argus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
Sort of like Jane Fonda finding Jesus NOW!
3 posted on 08/09/2002 11:51:39 AM PDT by funkywbr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
I wonder if Joe will get on board with the tobacco companies states litigation. You know, maybe put monies in escrow to pay for the smoking related law suites? Just a thought Joe. It would help those whom your hurt. Bwaaaaaa...fat chance of that happening.
4 posted on 08/09/2002 11:52:11 AM PDT by Rockiesrider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Argus
Yes, a rather selective sense of guilt. But its the liberal way, the easy way out. Blame smoking, and forget about all the other seaminess and various and sundry harmful addictions and lifestyle choices Hollyweird has glamorized over the years. And, of course, ignore and/or downplay any thought of individual choice or responsibility in any of it. I mean, geez, in my relatively short time (50 years) on this Earth, nobody has ever tried to force me to smoke. I chose not to, just as those who smoke likely made that choice themselves. Its no big deal. Like the Lady said, just say no...
5 posted on 08/09/2002 11:53:25 AM PDT by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
"My, My! Look at me! Aren't I important!"

If he said anything else, let me know because I missed it.

6 posted on 08/09/2002 11:55:24 AM PDT by Psycho_Bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: *puff_list
Index Bump
8 posted on 08/09/2002 12:09:04 PM PDT by Free the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
I had a helluva time getting off cigs. Amazing what seeing a guy with his jaw missing smoking through a stoma will do to you. Hope he makes it a while.

Amazing how many of us don't need God until we're looking the big D right in the face. Hope he's truly found Jesus.

9 posted on 08/09/2002 12:16:05 PM PDT by Richard Kimball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
I don't get it. Does the media influence the behavior of the young or not? Do people smoke because the movies make it look glamorous? Rob Reiner recently said so, too -- so I guess it's true.

But what about the sex and violence? Do the movies convince young people to indulge in these risky behaviors? Should we get Hollywood to clean up it's act when it comes to sex and violence?

Silence from Joe.

10 posted on 08/09/2002 12:28:32 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
Wait, wait, wait....there might be something to this.

I'm certain that Ole Horseface herself, Julia Roberts, smoked in a few of her movies - which caused me to smoke. Therefore, one of the bleeding heart activist judges in California (preferably the 9th Circuit) should give me a lot of money. So much money that she'll have to marry 4 other guys to pay me....yeah, that's the ticket!
11 posted on 08/09/2002 12:31:37 PM PDT by RabidBartender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
Does the media influence the behavior of the young or not?

That's a good point. And isn't the standard Hollywood scumbag response is to tell everybody to just turn off their TVs if they see something they don't like? But not when it comes to portraying smoking? What's going on here?

12 posted on 08/09/2002 12:36:21 PM PDT by vikingchick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
And the blame game goes on and on, I am responsible for my smoking..... no one else.
13 posted on 08/09/2002 12:44:20 PM PDT by Great Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Argus
Joe would never blame himself for contributing to higher rates of Aids and other STD's by glamorizing promiscuity and perversion in his movies, It would be most refreshing if someone did, it won't be in my lifetime.
14 posted on 08/09/2002 12:46:24 PM PDT by Great Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
Let's see if we can summon the rationality to make distinctions: some of what he says is right, some is not. (surprise!)

When he says Hollywood has blood on its (sic) hands, he is right. Movies do glamorize smoking, smoking is a nasty and lethal habit, kids do try to be the "cool" people they see on the screen.

Artists are morally responsible for the foreseeable influences of their art.

But when he extends that moral argument to make a legal one, that smoking ought to be proscribed like heroin, he is suffering from the inability to make distinctions which typifies liberal culture, and in an ironic way, most on this thread.

15 posted on 08/09/2002 12:46:58 PM PDT by Taliesan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
I don't think smoking is every person's right anymore. I think smoking should be as illegal as heroin.

Just exactly what the world needs, Joe: another excuse for masked LEOs to kick in peoples' doors in the middle of the night.

But as long as it makes you feel better, Joe. That's the important thing.

16 posted on 08/09/2002 12:49:36 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
If this reasoning holds, then they are responsible for the majority of armed robberies, adulteries, murders, gangs, Mafia, and most sin, because they glorify all of it.

Hey...not too bad.

17 posted on 08/09/2002 1:35:22 PM PDT by ImaGraftedBranch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
Hollywood is also responsible for gun deaths and the wrongheaded use of firearms in general.It is not the tobacco industry or the gun industry that should be sued BUT HOLLYWOOD.
18 posted on 08/09/2002 2:25:22 PM PDT by INSENSITIVE GUY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: INSENSITIVE GUY
How insensitive can you be?
19 posted on 08/09/2002 2:30:18 PM PDT by Khepera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Argus
You hit the nail on the head. Nobody forces anybody else to smoke! I smoked since I was 14 years old as did a lot of people. Most everyone I know has quit because we WANTED to quit. It was a choice to start and it was a choice to quit.

I don't like nudity and filth in the movies and therefore, it is MY CHOICE to not go and pay those ridiculously high prices to see these "stars" nude. Who cares? Anyway, it is MY choice.

As for the cigarette smoking...don't go where people smoke! It's like they all jump on the bandwagon when people want to see porn taken off a show. What do they say? they say "don't turn it on" or "turn off your TV" or "don't go to the movie"... well, its the same thing. Freedom of choce to smoke or not to smoke.
If there is a restaurant or bar that allows smoking then it is choice to go or stay away. It's simple. They just like to make it difficult when it suits their purpose.
20 posted on 08/09/2002 3:25:57 PM PDT by cubreporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson