Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

General Motors' Adoption of Smoke-Free Policy in All Ingham County Plants/MI
The Center for Social Gerontology ^ | 5 July 2002 | Jim Bergman

Posted on 07/08/2002 7:33:23 AM PDT by SheLion

General Motors' Adoption of Smoke-Free Policy in All Ingham County Plants Hailed by Smoke-Free Environments Law Project of The Center for Social Gerontology.

The Center for Social Gerontology (TCSG), based in Ann Arbor, Michigan, and its Smoke-Free Environments Law Project hailed the actions of the General Motors Corporation in adopting a total ban on smoking in all its Ingham County, Michigan plants and facilities, effective August 5, 2002.

Jim Bergman, TCSG Co-Director and head of the Smoke-Free Environments Law Project said: "General Motors management is to be highly praised for announcing the adoption of a totally smoke-free policy in all their Ingham County auto plants. Having worked very closely with the Ingham County Commissioners and Health Department on the adoption of a county-wide smoke-free worksite regulation, which was enacted on February 12, 2002, we at the Smoke-Free Environments Law Project are aware that General Motors could have sought permission to create designated smoking areas in their plants. Instead, they have opted to 'adopt a wall-to-wall no smoking policy' which applies to 'all employees, contractors and visitors,' effective August 5, 2002.

This is a tremendous victory for workers - old and young - whose health was threatened by secondhand smoke in General Motors facilities, a number of whom sought help from our Smoke-Free Environments Law Project in recent years. We also commend the Ingham County Health Department for their work with General Motors on this policy."

"The adoption by General Motors of a total ban on smoking in its Ingham County facilities is huge - for GM workers and in its implications for all businesses. This action by General Motors shows that corporations of any size can adapt to smoke-free policies and that union members - most of whom are not smokers - will accept such policies for their own health and the health of their co-workers. We hope and expect that other corporations will follow the lead of GM in adopting smoke-free policies," stated Bergman.

To access a copy of the General Motors smoke-free policy online, go to http://www.tcsg.org/sfelp/images/GM.jpg To access a copy of the Ingham County smoke-free regulation, go to http://www.ingham.org/BC/adoptedsmokingregulation.PDF

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Center for Social Gerontology (TCSG), was founded in 1972 as a nonprofit, research, training and social policy organization, based in Ann Arbor, Michigan. The Smoke-Free Environments Law Project (SFELP) is a statewide project of TCSG which provides information, consultation and advice for businesses, local units of government, and individuals in Michigan on policies and practices to protect employees and the general public from the harmful effects of secondhand smoke and to address the legal requirements and liability issues related to secondhand smoke.

For comprehensive information on this topic, go to the web site of the Smoke-Free Environments Law Project at http://www.tcsg.org/sfelp/home.htm.


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Announcements; Culture/Society; Government; US: Michigan
KEYWORDS: antismokers; butts; cigarettes; individualliberty; michaeldobbs; niconazis; prohibitionists; pufflist; smokingbans; tobacco
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-158 next last
To: kevin
As a second thought, look what aids and hiv is doing to our health care system..ya got the balls to back banning homosexual behaviour from the USA?

I'd rather ban the use of taxpayer money to support the healthcare of others.

41 posted on 07/08/2002 9:38:06 AM PDT by A Ruckus of Dogs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
I belive this is to comply with the Ingham County Commish which banned smoking in workplaces and public building. I was there when it happened.

Blame the Commish, GM had no say in the matter.

42 posted on 07/08/2002 9:43:56 AM PDT by Dan from Michigan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
There are going to be some upset workers. I would be a little leary of the quality control on an vehicle produced there for a while. Disgruntled employees tend to have a little less pride in their work.

A perfect example of this is the '96 Impala SS. The workers in that Texas plant knew that was going to be the last year and they probably would be out of a job soon. As a result it is rare to find an Impala from that year with all of the body panels square and lined up. It's a shame because that was the year that they finally got the design right.

43 posted on 07/08/2002 9:46:16 AM PDT by L_Von_Mises
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
Blame the Commish, GM had no say in the matter.

Yes, Dan. But what about the Union? Union's aren't strong anymore? I know the smokers are in the minority, but surely the Union should have stepped in to help them. If you have a gripe against the company, you go to the UNION.

Well, the union sure didn't do any good here, I am afraid.

44 posted on 07/08/2002 9:49:41 AM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: A Ruckus of Dogs
Companies have a right to determine what goes on on their property, whether it be smoking or non-smoking. If you don't believe that, then you are no different from those liberals who want to control the posessions and property of others.

Perhaps, it is you that is the liberal. It was Hitler that first adopted no-smoking policies. Hitler(a socialist) would be so proud of your support for at least one of his policies. For your information, a public corporation is not a private individual.

45 posted on 07/08/2002 9:51:21 AM PDT by waterstraat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: waterstraat
Who was it that said a thread is at the end of rational discussion when Hitler or Nazis are mentioned?
46 posted on 07/08/2002 9:56:41 AM PDT by A Ruckus of Dogs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: A Ruckus of Dogs
"Who was it that said a thread is at the end of rational discussion when Hitler or Nazis are mentioned?

A basic Freeper-ism that has been proven once again.

47 posted on 07/08/2002 10:03:29 AM PDT by ez2muz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: L_Von_Mises
There are going to be some upset workers. I would be a little leary of the quality control on an vehicle produced there for a while. Disgruntled employees tend to have a little less pride in their work.

It's already happened at SAPPI Paper Mill. They went Smoke Free on their LOT 1 July. The following is an email I received from an employee, who shall remain nameless. Read this. It's going to happen all over, you watch:

There are two fellows who are close to 60 in age and have no intention to quit smoking. They work at the wet end of the machine where the rest rooms are small and the doors can be locked. Normally, there are no women working at the wet end and all the security people who do rounds are men, so one or both of these guys were sneaking their smokes in the ladies' room!

Well, there was a woman , working in the wet end lab and she used that ladies' room (she had a choice of 2 others) right after one of the guys had a puff. Blank reported the smoke to security and an "incident report" was filed. Blank quit smoking last year, so maybe she's one of those ex-smokers who are miserable and wants to share the misery.

I probably won't know until Monday what's going to happen.

Just to bring you up to date, the smoking ban at our mill too effect @ 0600 on 1 JUL.

Since then, a few people have cheated. Two older guys, age close to 60, were using the Ladies' Room close to the control room where they work. They should have been okay, however, a tester named Blank used the rest room shortly after someone had smoked. She called Security. All 3 people are PACE union members. Blank quit smoking last year!

I haven't heard Blank’s excuse yet for blowing the whistle. I'm sure it'll be pretty lame.

It's funny how some of these people pick on the other fellow until their own turn comes.

1.. Blank is a volunteer fireman in Skowhegan. One time, he got his picture in the paper when a load of manure overturned in the middle of town and had to hose it off with water from a fire hydrant. This guy will go into a burning house and hose away cow dung, but whines like a baby if he smells a cigarette.

Plus this guy is a first class skunk. One Lady is one of my smoking buddies. She was out on vacation when the smoking area was moved away from the winder where she and blank worked. Blank-the-Skunk deliberately saved a "smoking area" sign and, when Lady came back to work, pasted it up in the area that used to be a smoking area. Lady didn't know any better and lit up ... Blank-the-Skunk ran right to the foreman to turn her in. Lady did get off okay. Just the same, this was a Union Brother playing a dirty trick to hurt a Union Sister.

2... One of Blanks mates is BUB-the-Baby. He whines about everything ... the foreman can't stand him (and neither could all his ex-wives!). Poor BUB hates the smell of smoke ... outside the mill, he is a dairy farmer. I guess he loves the smell of cow shit.

3.. And BLANKER. He was a Marine during Vietnam but did all his duty in the USA. He was all for gay rights in the military back when that was an issue. His answer was "It didn't bother me.". He had a gay in his unit but I guess BLANKER was too ugly to turn the guy on ... I don't know! Blanker quit smoking and is another ex-smoker who's gone crazy. Part of that is that his mother-in-law has emphysema and he has someone to care for when, with the kids gone, he thought he was home-free. I think Blanker is one of those "Me, Myself & I" type of guys.

A while back, the Company played a trick on the Union. It used to be that the ranks on the paper machine were like the military, E-9 down to E-1. The Company wanted the E-9 to become a manager and let the Union vote on it. By a 2-1 vote, the Union rejected letting their members manage. Then the Company abolished the E-9 job and busted everyone back a pay grade.

Blanker lost $3/hour when he got busted. He cried like a baby after that because he is now about 10 years away from getting that $3 back. But he's a hardnose if one of his Union members has a smoke. In fact, if either Blank or Blankee (who smoke in the Girls' Room) get fired, BUB moves up in the line-of-progression. He can make money by snitching on a Union brother! We have just enough skunks in the yard to help Sappi succeed.

My smoking buddies are the nicest people you could ever meet. They aren't nasty people. I can't say this for a lot of the "anti's". They're loaded with venom!

It ain't pretty!

48 posted on 07/08/2002 10:03:52 AM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
Well, I didn't see any union reps at the County Commish meeting. Lots of Amer. Lung Assoc people, etc, public health fascists, and the like were there though. We were outnumbered, and I only smoke an occasional cigar.
49 posted on 07/08/2002 10:07:43 AM PDT by Dan from Michigan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
"This is a trend starting with big corporations. SAPPI Paper Mills went completely smoke free 1 July. An employee will be terminated if they are caught smoking, even in their private vehicle on the lot."

All those in favor of policies like this can kiss my rebel backside. One of these days, the liberal thugs in our society will get their number called. I just hope it does not happen too late.

50 posted on 07/08/2002 10:41:53 AM PDT by ohioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A Ruckus of Dogs
Up yours! Nazi asshole.
51 posted on 07/08/2002 10:43:08 AM PDT by ohioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: A Ruckus of Dogs
I think it is unfair to begin persecuting your workers who are smokers after so many years. Can you imagine working at GM for 20 years and having them all of the sudden change the rules?

It is within their rights to change the rules. You are most certainly correct. It is also within my rights to not purchase a product from a company that jumps on the bandwagon with a feel good, knee jerk health program that is going to piss off a lot of its workers.

I certainly don't want the government forcing a company to allow or disallow smoking.
52 posted on 07/08/2002 10:46:08 AM PDT by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: WhyisaTexasgirlinPA
Alaska Airlines has an employee policy of no smoking. It is in their application.

A close relative of mine is dying from second hand smoke (lung cancer). Maybe these rules are to prevent more of the same to others. It is to protect, not deprive. Maybe if some folks weren't so selfish and thought of others...

53 posted on 07/08/2002 10:57:36 AM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
I watched a Documentary on Hitler last night, and they say things go full circle. Believe me, it's going full circle!

And who did the documentary? A liberal media source? Did they get you to buy thier propaganda?

54 posted on 07/08/2002 10:59:32 AM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: A Ruckus of Dogs
There is more than one reason, and it varies by organization.
55 posted on 07/08/2002 11:00:37 AM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ohioman
All those in favor of policies like this can kiss my rebel backside. One of these days, the liberal thugs in our society will get their number called. I just hope it does not happen too late.

You and me both.

I know that only 1 out of 4 people smoke, but tobacco has been around for hundreds of years. And the inaccurate, deceitful and dishonest lies about second hand smoke from the anti's is just becoming unbearable.

I believe in smoking sections and non-smoking sections. That is fair to everyone. But to completely go smoke free, especially if it is mandated by the government, this is WRONG.

And like Just Another Joe said: why did GM have the option to provide a smoking section or not, and the restaurants and bars do not. Something isn't passing the smell test.

56 posted on 07/08/2002 11:10:08 AM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: mysterio
I think it is unfair to begin persecuting your workers who are smokers after so many years. Can you imagine working at GM for 20 years and having them all of the sudden change the rules?

Your certainly right! It's cruel and inhumane punishment. People need their jobs, and this is really going to add to a lot of ill tempered and embittered employees.

You know, a lot of these people have only a few years left to go before they can collect their pensions. They just can't up and quit. "They" have them by the you know what.

57 posted on 07/08/2002 11:17:51 AM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican
And who did the documentary? A liberal media source? Did they get you to buy thier propaganda?

Excuse me?

Your telling me that Hitler's way of life and control was a GOOD THING? What are you saying here.

58 posted on 07/08/2002 11:20:12 AM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
What's going on here is a big push to make people accept edicts and pronouncements from on high, by our unelected betters.

It's part and parcel with things like seatbelt laws, helmet laws, commands and demands from the nutrition "experts", regional planning by consensus, in other words, softening us up for Agenda 21.

59 posted on 07/08/2002 12:18:21 PM PDT by metesky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican
I'm willing to bet you can't show me a death certificate that states unequivocally: CAUSE OF DEATH: SECOND HAND SMOKE.

Anecdotal BS never rings my chimes. Try it on the more credulous.
60 posted on 07/08/2002 12:23:44 PM PDT by metesky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-158 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson