Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate OKs $31.5B Anti-Terror Bill
Associated Press ^ | 7 June 2002 | Alan Fram

Posted on 06/06/2002 9:57:24 PM PDT by PhiKapMom

Senate OKs $31.5B Anti-Terror Bill

By ALAN FRAM
.c The Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) - The Senate gave overwhelming approval early Friday to a counterterrorism bill costing more than $31.5 billion, ignoring a White House veto threat and setting up a politically tinged showdown over the price tag for domestic security.

After four days of debate, senators approved the legislation by 71-22, despite objections by the Bush administration and many Republicans that it was too expensive. The post-midnight vote followed a testy final flurry in which a few dozen amendments were accepted but scores of others were dropped over the angry protests of several senators.

Passage came hours after President Bush announced his proposal to merge federal anti-terror efforts into a Cabinet-level Department of Homeland Security and declared that America was waging ``a titanic struggle against terror.''

With that backdrop, Senate Republican leaders decided against dragging debate into next week on a package laden with funds for U.S. troops, airport safety and other popular initiatives. Instead, they will count on upcoming House-Senate negotiations on a final version to pare it or produce a bill that Bush would veto - just as this year's campaigns for congressional control are ramping up.

``Clearly the bill has gotten out of control,'' said Senate Minority Leader Trent Lott, R-Miss, but ``to just drag this out into next week would not be a positive thing.''

Bush proposed a $27.1 billion anti-terror package in March, and the House approved a $29 billion bill in May. The spending is for the remaining months of the federal budget year that ends Sept. 30.

Democrats chided GOP critics of the bill, which mostly contains funds for the military, FBI, efforts to thwart cyber- and bioterrorism, and other responses to the Sept. 11 attacks.

``Tell your people back home they don't need this protection,'' said Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Robert Byrd, D-W.Va. ``Tell them, don't tell us.''

Sens. Phil Gramm, R-Texas, and John McCain, R-Ariz., unsuccessfully offered a series of amendments to underline their point that piggybacked onto the bill were pet projects and other items that were not dire emergencies. They also argued that the Appropriations panel included projects that were scheduled for next year to ease a budget crunch expected then.

Even so, the Senate time and again refused to strip items from the legislation, underlining the Appropriations Committee's power and Congress' long tradition of attaching parochial items to must-pass bills.

By 65-31, the Senate refused to remove language providing $2.5 million for mapping Hawaiian coral reefs. Supporters of the funds said the provision steered money approved last year to an effort to protect endangered ocean life, but Gramm and McCain said the provision showed how some lawmakers were using the bill.

The Senate also rebuffed by 66-30 an effort to remove $2 million to help the Smithsonian Institution plan a storage facility for its animal specimens preserved in 730,000 gallons of flammable alcohol.

Working through a stack of amendments, senators voted 75-19 to forbid U.S. cooperation with the international war crimes tribunal, a permanent court that starts operations next month and has been opposed by the president. The House has approved a nearly identical ban.

The Senate boosted the bill's cost a bit by voting 79-14 for a proposal by Sens. Bill Frist, R-Tenn., and Jesse Helms, R-N.C., to double to $200 million the bill's funds for fighting AIDS overseas. A Democratic effort to boost the total to $500 million was rejected 49-46.

Gramm also blocked inclusion of a bipartisan deal reached among some top senators that would have set a cap on next year's spending and set procedures for enforcing that limit. The figure - which excludes benefits such as Social Security - was $768 billion, $9 billion more than Bush proposed and $29 billion higher than is to be spent this year.

Many lawmakers want such an agreement because bipartisan fights have blocked passage of a congressional budget this year that would limit spending. But Gramm and other conservatives want to hold out for a lower figure.

The anti-terror bill contains $5.5 billion to help New York's recovery from the World Trade Center destruction, $200 million for Israel and $50 million for humanitarian aid to Palestinians and $100 million to fight AIDS in poor nations.

But highlighting how the measure would also help local interests, it has $2.5 million for research in Greenport, N.Y., on foot and mouth disease; $73 million for relief from floods in Virginia, West Virginia, Illinois, Michigan and Kentucky; and language directing the Agriculture Department not to carry out Bush's budget proposal to cut federal honey bee research.

06/07/02 00:35 EDT


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government
KEYWORDS: homelandsecurity; porkprojects
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
Posted for your information! Words escape me as to what I think about pork on a Homeland Security bill or at least words fit to print!
1 posted on 06/06/2002 9:57:24 PM PDT by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
But don't you know that terrorists are building hideouts in coral reefs? They must be mapped.
2 posted on 06/06/2002 9:59:45 PM PDT by July 4th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
"Posted for your information! Words escape me as to what I think about pork on a Homeland Security bill or at least words fit to print!"

You hit the target! Pork! My question is, where are we getting all this money from? Man someones generation is going to pay a huge price...

3 posted on 06/06/2002 10:04:47 PM PDT by PoppingSmoke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
$200 million for Israel and $50 million for humanitarian aid to Palestinians

Isn't that what bookies do? Set the line?

4 posted on 06/06/2002 10:05:02 PM PDT by PRND21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: July 4th
"But don't you know that terrorists are building hideouts in coral reefs?"

Now we know what that "scuba-diving terrorist" alert was all about.

5 posted on 06/06/2002 10:10:15 PM PDT by Fabozz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Fabozz
If GWB can get Saddammnn to declare West Verginny off limits, will the Senate knock off, lets say, $6 or $7 billion from this porker?
6 posted on 06/06/2002 10:26:37 PM PDT by bybybill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
`'Clearly the bill has gotten out of control,'' said Senate Minority Leader Trent Lott, R-Miss, but ``to just drag this out into next week would not be a positive thing.''

That about sums up Lott's tenure as Republican Senate leader, doesn't it?
7 posted on 06/06/2002 11:39:02 PM PDT by over3Owithabrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom; PoppingSmoke
Lots of pork flyin' around Capitol Hill...

And Congress just keeps on porkin' us!


8 posted on 06/06/2002 11:49:38 PM PDT by ppaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: over3Owithabrain
It sure does sum up Lott! Won't stand up and fight for anything!
9 posted on 06/06/2002 11:51:59 PM PDT by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
bump
10 posted on 06/07/2002 12:17:36 AM PDT by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Click here to sign petition asking Sen. Leheay to step down.....

FReegards,

David C. Osborne

11 posted on 06/07/2002 4:21:32 AM PDT by davidosborne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
VETO VETO VETO
12 posted on 06/07/2002 5:14:55 AM PDT by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rintense
VETO VETO VETO

As far as I know, Bush has already said he would veto it in its current form. Then the Senate made it worse. He'll flush it.

13 posted on 06/07/2002 6:14:28 AM PDT by Steve0113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Steve0113
Mr. President! Tear down this... I mean... veto this bill!
14 posted on 06/07/2002 6:34:34 AM PDT by Ingtar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
It's not just the pork, one of the 'add-ons' is the required release of so-called family planning dollars to UNFPA. (Read: the exportation of abortions abroad using our tax dollars to kill of little dark-skinned children that Leftist children hate.)
15 posted on 06/07/2002 6:36:45 AM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
Leftist children hate = that Leftists hate
16 posted on 06/07/2002 6:37:35 AM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Steve0113
Yep! I certainly hope he does it!
17 posted on 06/07/2002 6:42:43 AM PDT by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: rintense
What does fighting AIDS in poor countries have to do with anti-terrorism?? This is pathetic.

Hope he vetos but I doubt he does. He issued the threat but since he hasn't issued a veto yet, the Senate is calling his bluff. We shall see. Has to go to conference first, I believe. The House bill is 29 billion, the Senate 31.5 billion. Bet they split the difference and settle on 30 billion and W will sign it.

18 posted on 06/07/2002 7:20:52 AM PDT by Wphile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Wphile
Well if that is true, then I will go on record and say that I am sadly disappointed. But I do think he will veto it.
19 posted on 06/07/2002 7:27:07 AM PDT by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: rintense
I hope you are right Rin but I'm basing my assessment on past practice. He could easily veto it and generate support for the veto by pointing out the obviously egregious pork barrel spending. If he vetos, I'll buy you a drink and I look forward to buying it!

BTW, I'm not trying to be cynical just realistic.

20 posted on 06/07/2002 7:30:03 AM PDT by Wphile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson