Skip to comments.
Bush's 'open door' slammed
Washington Times ^
| Friday, April 19, 2002
| By Jerry Seper
Posted on 04/18/2002 11:31:49 PM PDT by JohnHuang2
Edited on 07/12/2004 3:52:40 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
President Bush is the leading obstacle to controlling illegal immigration in this country and his "open door" border policy is a threat to national security, the Republican chairman of the Congressional Immigration Reform Caucus said yesterday.
Rep. Tom Tancredo told editors and reporters in a luncheon meeting at The Washington Times that Mr. Bush is out of step with the majority of Americans who want immigration reform and that his "altruistic views" on the subject were an open invitation to new terrorist attacks.
(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-171 next last
To: Tancredo Fan
Ping
To: JohnHuang2
Bush is crusading for an open door because he has an empty head.
3
posted on
04/18/2002 11:39:55 PM PDT
by
RLK
To: RLK
WASHINGTON, April 18 By a unanimous vote, the Senate passed a bill today to increase the security of the nation's borders, to improve enforcement of immigration laws and to restrict the admission of visitors from countries that support terrorism. The vote was 97 to 0.
The House has passed two bills with very similar provisions and is expected to accept the changes made by the Senate.
President Bush supports the legislation and has described border security as one of his top priorities.
Link
Tancredo - Grandstanding at it's worst.
4
posted on
04/18/2002 11:45:23 PM PDT
by
PRND21
To: JohnHuang2
To: JohnHuang2
"Border defense needs to be closely coordinated, and overseen by responsible officials with both the resources and the commitment to do their jobs."
Lets be real.. True border control would require at least 500,000 to maybe 1,000,000 border agents. The cost of doing this would be crazy so what do we do. We here control the borders, control the borders but nothing about the dollars it would take to really make it happen. You say use the military like O'Rielly keeps harping on but the numbers are the same so we'd need half a million more military troops with probably 150 Billion dollars added to the defense budget?
To: JohnHuang2
How dare you post the truth on this forum!!!
To: sabertooth
bump
8
posted on
04/18/2002 11:59:51 PM PDT
by
Pelham
To: america-rules
Sounds like the Michael Medved "Just give up, it can't be done" line.
9
posted on
04/19/2002 12:01:15 AM PDT
by
Pelham
To: JohnHuang2
Tell it like it is, Rep. Tancredo!
10
posted on
04/19/2002 1:34:07 AM PDT
by
brat
To: JohnHuang2
We need a "Closed Door" policy in the aftermath of 9-11. We will continue to make sure individuals inimical to the U.S don't slip in and create more havoc. We have too many injured and dead to continue business as usual when it comes to our national immigration policy and control over this country's borders.
To: america-rules;
Victoria Delsoul; Pelham; Travis McGee; Joe Hadenuf; sarcasm; harpseal...
Lets be real.. True border control would require at least 500,000 to maybe 1,000,000 border agents. The cost of doing this would be crazy so what do we do? We hear control the borders, control the borders but nothing about the dollars it would take to really make it happen.
Listen again...
They Will
Deport Themsleves
1. Make the Illegals and their Co-conspirators, their employers, pay for the necessary expenditures through Total Asset Forfeiture. Seize businesses that knowingly hire Illegals, and auction them off. Proceeds go to enforcement against Illegals in the American Interior.
2. You want manpower? After 9/11, many Americans were looking for ways to volunteer... How about creating a Border Patrol Reserve. A lot of patriotic, over-40 types woul be only too happy to serve
3. We need to make up our minds to win the War against Illegals before the shooting starts in earnest. The same snivelers saying we can't win against Illegals once said we couldn't win against Terror.
We're America, and we can win any war we want to win. Get used to it.
To: Sabertooth
Bravo Sabertooth, all you have listed is pure common sense.
To: JohnHuang2
Tancredo would be ten times a better President we any we have ever had.
To: JohnHuang2
Maybe we ought to send those contributions earmarked for the Bush campaign to Tancredo's office instead. That'd get Rove's attention.
15
posted on
04/19/2002 7:57:51 AM PDT
by
skeeter
To: PRND21
"the Senate passed a bill today to increase the security of the nation's borders, to improve enforcement of immigration laws and to restrict the admission of visitors from countries that support terrorism."
Fine words, but what do the bills actually do?
16
posted on
04/19/2002 8:01:08 AM PDT
by
Tauzero
To: america-rules
"You say use the military like O'Rielly keeps harping on but the numbers are the same so we'd need half a million more military troops with probably 150 Billion dollars added to the defense budget?"
Gee, that sure sounds like a lot.
As a cost-saving measure, we could use minefields.
17
posted on
04/19/2002 8:02:51 AM PDT
by
Tauzero
Comment #18 Removed by Moderator
To: Sabertooth
Guess what, Sabertooth. I completely agree with you.
19
posted on
04/19/2002 8:06:17 AM PDT
by
rintense
To: Marine Inspector;healey22;lutine;Right_Makes_Might;wku man;sonofliberty2;fishing fool...
"Closed borders, open borders. I used to think it was Karl Rove [the White House political strategist] and his outreach to Hispanics," Mr. Tancredo said. "But no, it's Mr. Bush. He's driving the issue himself. He believes in open borders."He made promises to Fox and wants to keep Fox in power," he said.
The globalist one-term wonder gets slapped down again. Good. Thanks for the ping :-D
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-171 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson