Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tancredo doubts he can block amnesty-extension bill
Denver Post ^ | March 8, 2002 | Bill McAllister

Posted on 03/08/2002 1:24:33 PM PST by sarcasm

Friday, March 08, 2002 - WASHINGTON - Rep. Tom Tancredo takes credit for thwarting the Bush administration's last effort to offer partial amnesty to thousands of illegal residents, but Thursday the outspoken immigration foe said he may have been outmaneuvered by the White House.

President Bush has struck a deal with the House leadership to place legislation that offers an extension of amnesty on its consent calendar before Bush heads to Mexico for a state visit next week, the Colorado Republican said.

That action should ensure quick House passage of legislation that Bush has repeatedly sought from Congress. It would allow an undocumented person to receive legal standing, such as a valid green card, by filing a declaration with the Immigration and Naturalization Service.

It presumably also would require the person to have been in the United States by a certain date and have filed a declaration with the INS from an appropriate sponsor, such as a relative or employer, and pay a $1,000 penalty.

"The terms are still up in the air," said Dan Stein, executive director of the Federation for American Immigration, a group that has been allied with Tancredo. "We've heard to the effect that the president wants something to bring down to Mexico."

The initial Bush proposal, designed exclusively for Mexicans, once was high on the president's legislative wish list, but it was delayed after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11. However, as the president noted Wednesday in a speech to the Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, he now is pushing for the extension of the amnesty program known by the section of immigration law that covers it, Section 245I.

The president hailed it as a way to reunite family, separated by the border. "If you believe in family values, if you understand the worth of family and the importance of family, let's get 245I out of the United States Congress and give me a chance to sign it," Bush told the chamber members.

Tancredo, the head of a congressional caucus on immigration issues and proponent of halting virtually all immigration, said he had blocked a previous attempt by Bush to push an extension of the amnesty program through the House. But this time, he said House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert, R-Ill., had agreed to place the issue on the suspension, or consent, calendar, making it difficult to defeat the proposal.

The Senate might be more favorable to the bill than the House, expanding the numbers of individuals who can apply, Tancredo said.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: freetrade; hughhewitt; immigrantlist; nwo; terrorwar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 541-560561-580581-600 ... 2,941-2,945 next last
To: Vallandigham
"We're up to 5 defenders of the Bush immigration program, and 77 who are irate. The fumin' 77 of the fightin' right are:"

Good Method! It also gets obvious who it is that do the personal attacks when you I.D. the main kissups :-)

561 posted on 03/09/2002 1:38:01 PM PST by rdavis84
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 556 | View Replies]

To: 4ourprogeny
and even the trash in the streets are all a preview of the coming attractions of 21st-century America.

Exactly. In the 1970s, Houston's bus stops were clean. There was not any litter or garbage lying on the ground.

Well, thanks to unchecked immigration, the clientele on Houston buses is different and the bus stops are now a complete pig sty.

562 posted on 03/09/2002 1:38:27 PM PST by HennepinPrisoner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 532 | View Replies]

To: Vallandigham
The ratio of 77 irate posters to 5 defenders of illegal aliens (boo hoo) is about right for the whole country in general. Last time I saw the polls 80+ of the population are against amnesties and want the border closed. People all over country reading this thread agree with us, and Bush and co. can count on paying a political price for this sellout. Like I said in a previous post, I want to support him, but not as long as he's more worried about illegal aliens than the people he's elected to serve. That's Americans. Remember us Mr Bush?
563 posted on 03/09/2002 1:41:40 PM PST by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 556 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest
Just because we've supported the President on everything else on his agenda doesn't mean we have to support him where he's wrong. And he's definitely wrong in pushing for an amnesty for illegals. As for the politics of it --- he loses more votes from the base than he'd gain from newly naturalized Latinos, most of them who'd never vote for him any way. And if those who ARE citizens aren't its cause they don't like the GOP's pandering to illegals any more than the rest of Americans do. A little news flash for the President and his political guru Karl Rove: they backed Dick Riordan here in California and Riordan ran on a platform of more government services for illegal aliens. He lost by a thumping double digit margin. Its about time the White House wake up!
564 posted on 03/09/2002 1:49:10 PM PST by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 563 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Only more enforcement of our immigration laws will.

Unfortunately, Congress and the White House do not want the INS to enforce the Immigration Laws. I have been sitting here for the last six months and Congress and the White House has not passed one new law that would help INS enforce the INA (Immigration & Nationality Act), nor have they pressured the INS Management to let the Enforcement Branch do it job under the current law.

I see no light at the end of this very dark tunnel. Nothing will be done to protect this countries borders.

565 posted on 03/09/2002 1:49:40 PM PST by Marine Inspector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 559 | View Replies]

Comment #566 Removed by Moderator

To: rdavis84
"...when you I.D. the main kissups :-)..." Engaging in a little rino/cino profiling? How intolerant! There should be a law! :>)
567 posted on 03/09/2002 1:51:24 PM PST by monkeywrench
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 561 | View Replies]

To: HennepinPrisoner
Exactly. In the 1970s, Houston's bus stops were clean. There was not any litter or garbage lying on the ground.

Well, thanks to unchecked immigration, the clientele on Houston buses is different and the bus stops are now a complete pig sty

Now this thread has gone from the sublime to the ridiculous.

First of all have you ever lived in Houston. Since your screen name suggests you live in Minnieapolis, MN. I highly doubt it.

I actually visited your part of the country. I spent my first year of college at the Univeristy of Wisconsin-Madison, which was filled with Minnesooootans who got "reciprocity"(i.e they got Minnesota tuition rates for attending college in Madison, party city.).

My roommate was from Minnetonka and we went up there for the UW-Minn. football game at the "Hubert Humphrey Dome(Hump Dome) and I met a lady who was complaining about the Hmong(Laotian boat people) who settled in Minnesota.

Have the Hmong ruined Minneapolis?

568 posted on 03/09/2002 1:51:50 PM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 562 | View Replies]

Comment #569 Removed by Moderator

To: Dawgsquat
"I'll have to keep looking for a party I can live with"

The American Independent party is conservative and takes a strong stance against illegal immigration.

570 posted on 03/09/2002 1:57:15 PM PST by Be active
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
But everything he does from here on out will be clouded by what he's doing with the illegal immigration issue. Even if his intentions are well meaning, he's losing a great deal of respect. People don't want this, the reasons are obvious. How can you expect every American citizen to respect laws they make in Washington when they reward lawbreakers everytime they turn around? They are making a mockery of the rule of law. Nothing Bush says will be taken seriously, even when he's right.
571 posted on 03/09/2002 1:57:44 PM PST by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 564 | View Replies]

To: Dane
First of all have you ever lived in Houston. Since your screen name suggests you live in Minnieapolis, MN. I highly doubt it.

Yes, I have.

I met a lady who was complaining about the Hmong(Laotian boat people) who settled in Minnesota. Have the Hmong ruined Minneapolis?

Not that I can tell. We have two Senators that have done a good job of that all on their own.

But the Hmong are legal immigrants and not queue jumpers.

572 posted on 03/09/2002 1:58:20 PM PST by HennepinPrisoner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 568 | View Replies]

To: Vallandigham;dougherty;goldstategop
Updated count. 5 defenders of the Bush immigration policy. 79 who are fed up. Among the 79 you can count in: dougherty & goldstategop

Welcome dougherty and goldstategop!

And, in the spirit of political correctness:

Bievenidos dougherty and goldstategop!:o))

573 posted on 03/09/2002 2:00:58 PM PST by HennepinPrisoner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 569 | View Replies]

Comment #574 Removed by Moderator

To: Be active
Thanks. I'll check them out.
575 posted on 03/09/2002 2:01:43 PM PST by Dawgsquat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 570 | View Replies]

To: Marine Inspector
I see no light at the end of this very dark tunnel. Nothing will be done to protect this countries borders.

Sad to say but I think you are correct. I am totally disillusioned by what is going on. A major vote is going to occur in the Congress on Tuesday and not one mention of it is in any of the papers. Most people are completely in the dark about what is happening to this country. I always voted for Republicans because I thought Democrats were destroying this country. Now I am convinced that Republicans have been equally destructive so I will vote for no one next time out.

576 posted on 03/09/2002 2:03:07 PM PST by blueriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 565 | View Replies]

Comment #577 Removed by Moderator

To: Vallandigham
Count me in as one more that's fed up with this whole charade. Bush will certainly lose to Hillary or Edwards if he pursues this bull$hit program.
578 posted on 03/09/2002 2:09:08 PM PST by jsraggmann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 569 | View Replies]

To: Vallandigham
Bttt! Make that list, check it twice...
579 posted on 03/09/2002 2:09:49 PM PST by monkeywrench
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 556 | View Replies]

To: Big Meanie
Dan Stein, executive director of the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR).

FAIR is a well known immigrant hate group. however, what I was showing you is that the states can only get involved in immigration to the extent the feds allow them because the consitition gives that duty to the feds. What I cited you was the federal statute that allows that to happen.

580 posted on 03/09/2002 2:15:58 PM PST by VA Advogado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 550 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 541-560561-580581-600 ... 2,941-2,945 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson