Skip to comments.
Man arrested at LAX with explosives
CNN
Posted on 02/18/2002 6:17:19 AM PST by newsperson999
Breaking on CNN, he had a "miltary type" explosive, LAX evacuated.
TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-117 next last
To: Nick Danger
LMAO...Can you imagine that guy in your picture actually running through an airport? I wonder how far he would make it before being tackled?
To: Chad Fairbanks
an Inert National Guardsman... Clever. ; )
62
posted on
02/18/2002 7:21:30 AM PST
by
nicmarlo
To: section9
Chris! ARG!
Don't you know that looking at pictures of Hillary can make a man sterile?
To: Lumberjack
Lumberjack, I was wondering the same thing. Thanks for asking. :) These people are not only evil, but incredibly stupid. I guess we have something to thank public schools for, eh? ;)
To: nicmarlo
a non-functioning explosive which resembles an M-80 firecracker So basically he was arrested for trying to board an aircraft carrying a toilet paper tube?
Oh, the humanity...
65
posted on
02/18/2002 7:26:49 AM PST
by
LouD
To: Chad Fairbanks
Inert explosives are designed to kill dead people. This can have a negative impact on a major Democrat voting bloc.
66
posted on
02/18/2002 7:30:20 AM PST
by
Consort
To: Nick Danger;texaggie79;tennessee_bob
![](http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/caption/582/image)
Another one for your collection.
To: section9
Ain't I a stinker? Great. Now I'm blind, too.
LOL!
To: RedBloodedAmerican
LOL! (#67).
You have more fun with Photoshop than any three people ought to be allowed to have!
To: Nick Danger
Love that T shirt. Could not wear one around here though...
To: nicmarlo
That doesn't look like an M-80 firecracker.
71
posted on
02/18/2002 8:07:54 AM PST
by
aruanan
To: newsperson999
WE NEED BOMB CONTROL, NOW!!! Oh wait, we've already got it...
Silly me.
To: aruanan
73
posted on
02/18/2002 8:22:21 AM PST
by
nicmarlo
To: Mixer
Perhaps this is a government test to make sure that the Federal screeners are doing their job right. ![](http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/caption/566/image)
Photo courtesy: Texaggie79
74
posted on
02/18/2002 8:39:58 AM PST
by
weegee
To: Lumberjack
Who in the name of Holy Moly would ever try to smuggle explosives through the one place in the entire country where they are actively looking for people smuggling explosives?!?Lets just be thankful that these people don't posess the common sense that God saw fit to bestow on a sack of grapefruit.
To: Blood of Tyrants
Or as dumb as voluntarily allowing a policeman to search your vechicle knowing you have contraband in it. But it happens all the time.Of course refusing to allow them to search the car is probable cause enough for them to impound it and THEN get a search warrent on such grounds.
To: nicmarlo
Guess he thought the law against explosives didn't apply to himself-- If it was inert, then it wasn't an explosive. Hopefully they won't hold the guy. I can see taking him into custody until the inertness was determined, but after that, what would be the charge?
77
posted on
02/18/2002 9:07:25 AM PST
by
El Gato
To: isthisnickcool
Don't you know that looking at pictures of Hillary can make a man sterile? Surely not. Impotent yes, but sterile?
78
posted on
02/18/2002 9:09:04 AM PST
by
El Gato
Comment #79 Removed by Moderator
To: newsperson999
I read it was a non functioning M80 firecracker. How does that get to be called a bomb? Maybe if it was C4?
80
posted on
02/18/2002 9:25:45 AM PST
by
A CA Guy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-117 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson