Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China is furious as Bush halts UN 'abortion' funds
Telegraph UK | 3 Feb 2002 | Damien McElroy

Posted on 02/03/2002 11:52:50 AM PST by The Old Hoosier

A DECISION by President Bush to suspend £24 million of United States funding to a United Nations body accused of assisting forced abortions in China is threatening to cloud his visit to Beijing this month.

By withholding the money from the UN Fund for Population Activities (UNFPA), Mr Bush has made clear his opposition to China's extreme population control methods. Beijing is hoping to extend the controls, which restrict the majority of couples to one child, for another generation.

Beijing is furious with Mr Bush, who has been swayed by reports implicating the UNFPA in abuses of the one-child policy. China's foreign ministry told The Telegraph that the US had not made the "correct choice".

"The allegations by some American congressmen on the UNFPA's support for China's forced abortion and sterilisation operations is totally groundless," said a spokesman. "Some Americans, acting regardless of the facts, have lobbied for the US to cancel its donation to the UNFPA. This is with ulterior intentions, and is unfavourable for international co-operation in population control."

Allegations about UNFPA collusion with Chinese officials responsible for forcing women to terminate unauthorised pregnancies came late last year from the Population Research Institute (PRI), an American right-to-life research group.

Scott Weinberg, the PRI director of government affairs, conceded, however, that the administration would suffer a backlash from the powerful pro-China lobby if Mr Bush criticised the one-child policy while visiting the country.

"If Bush makes the UNFPA issue into a question of China's one-child policy and into an attempt to reform Communist China, then we lose, because the China lobby is too powerful here," he said. "Bush would never bring up UNFPA publicly, and highly unlikely privately, during such a trip." Conservative members of the US Congress note that the President did not mention the issue on a trip to Shanghai in October. His decision on January 12 to halt UNFPA funding has angered China, however, and is set to inject a sour note into this month's visit, starting on February 21.

The trip has been portrayed by Beijing as marking the 30th anniversary of Richard Nixon's groundbreaking visit to China in 1972.

The PRI has campaigned to persuade Congress that the UN agency is ineligible for US financing because it supports abortion services abroad. US law prohibits grants of federal funds to any organisation involved in providing abortions overseas, and Mr Bush, in one of his first official acts, made clear that he - unlike President Clinton - would respect the restriction.

A PRI researcher, Josephine Guy, recently visited China incognito and claims to have witnessed a forced abortion in a county designated as a model family planning regime by the UNFPA.

Ms Guy gained access to Sihui county's family planning bureau to photograph the local UNFPA desk. At a local hospital later, she interviewed a 19-year-old woman minutes before family planning officials took her behind a curtain to perform a termination. "Would she like to keep her baby?" Ms Guy asked the teenager's friends as she was led away. "Oh, yes," came the reply, "but the law forbids it."

Steve Mosher, the head of the PRI, said the photographs and testimony obtained by Ms Guy proved that the UN body was violating its pledges not to assist abortion programmes. "The UNFPA has repeatedly been caught promoting abortion and sterilisation under circumstances where informed consent is lacking, and even outright coercion is involved," he said.

A report issued by his group included pictures of houses that had been demolished by Chinese family planning officials in retaliation for the occupants' refusal to abide by the one-child policy.

Sarah Craven, of the UNFPA Washington office, said the agency had negotiated with the Chinese for two years to ensure that its county programmes were not tainted by the zealotry or malpractice common in the implementation of the one-child policy.

"Our main goal is to show the Chinese that they can meet demographic goals without resorting to human-rights violations or coercion," she said.

In the drive to stabilise China's population at 1.6 billion by 2050, there have been millions of victims. Besides ordering abortions and sterilisations, family planning officials often grow wealthy from fines levied on people with no chance of legal redress.


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last
Now, this doesn't say what I think it says, does it? Has Bush made a final decision on this, or is it just that he "halted" the money and we're still waiting to see how it turns out?
1 posted on 02/03/2002 11:52:50 AM PST by The Old Hoosier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier
Sorry.

If Red China wants to murder babies, let them pay for it themselves, not us.

2 posted on 02/03/2002 11:58:16 AM PST by Gritty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier
The PRI has campaigned to persuade Congress that the UN agency is ineligible for US financing because it supports abortion services abroad. US law prohibits grants of federal funds to any organisation involved in providing abortions overseas, and Mr Bush, in one of his first official acts, made clear that he - unlike President Clinton - would respect the restriction.

I'm happy with this decision either way. It respects our LAW and it respects human life. And I RESPECT our President for doing the right thing! GOD BLESS PRESIDENT BUSH!!!!!!

3 posted on 02/03/2002 11:59:04 AM PST by Republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier
Nah... no way.

Any moment now our bush bashers masquerading as pro life proponents, will be here to explain why this means nothing, just like the classification of fetii as persons so the mothers can get health care in lieu of opting to "end it all".

Somehow they will find a way to call this "baby killing" using recirculating reconstrution of the reality the rest of us call truth.

Fact is, President Bush is the most proactive "pro life" president we have ever had, and short of outlawing accepted forms of birth control, he will move in the direction of life like this, incrementally as the heart of the nation changes.

It matters not, to those who hate the man, NO WORKS are good enough to merit a word of praise, and painting him as an evil man who wants abortion to continue, will be the rule not the exception.

They should be arriving any moment now.

4 posted on 02/03/2002 12:01:00 PM PST by Robert_Paulson2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier
China's foreign ministry told The Telegraph that the US had not made the "correct choice".

A most interesting choice of words.

5 posted on 02/03/2002 12:04:13 PM PST by Prince Caspian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gritty
Why are we putting in so much for their problem? If it means so much to them, they can redirect the money they spend for nuclear missles they plan to aim our way
6 posted on 02/03/2002 12:10:22 PM PST by Eowyn-of-Rohan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier
We're going to accede to their demands, and stop meddling in their internal affairs. Uh-huh.
7 posted on 02/03/2002 12:14:14 PM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier
Two weeks ago they were sqawking about the so called 'bugs' planted in the plane, now this claptrap. Same old same old.....Maybe all that stuff worked with X42 but surely President Bush will not be amused or apologetic.
8 posted on 02/03/2002 12:15:34 PM PST by OldFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prince Caspian
China's foreign ministry told The Telegraph that the US had not made the "correct choice".

Well then, we have a disparity here between what the Chinese consider to be correct, and what most of us here consider to be correct. I would disagree with the Chinese. The US has made the correct choice.

9 posted on 02/03/2002 12:21:29 PM PST by Mark17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Gritty
Gee! How much does it cost to murder a baby?
10 posted on 02/03/2002 12:50:28 PM PST by dvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gritty
If Red China wants to murder babies, let them pay for it themselves, not us.

Yeah, they have the funds to finance a 16 million member armed forces, but they can't manage a measly $ 40 million to finance a few cockamany(sp?) programs to augment their depraved family planning policies. I suppose after you tell pregnant women they will be forced to have abortions, they then need some sort of counseling. As if that breaks the bank.

11 posted on 02/03/2002 1:05:47 PM PST by yeswecan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Republic
"unlike President Clinton"

Music to my ears!

12 posted on 02/03/2002 1:12:18 PM PST by NewCenturions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier
Now, this doesn't say what I think it says, does it? Has Bush made a final decision on this, or is it just that he "halted" the money and we're still waiting to see how it turns out?

Either way, I just emailed the President, thanking him. Thanks for posting this report.
Alas

13 posted on 02/03/2002 1:14:47 PM PST by Alas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert_Paulson2
I love President Bush.
14 posted on 02/03/2002 1:17:21 PM PST by SharonLorraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier
GOOD GOING G.W.!Finally,somebody in this rollover for China government shows some guts.There's not one damn thing we've done for China that will benefit us.
15 posted on 02/03/2002 1:29:24 PM PST by INSENSITIVE GUY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier
Um, excuse me, but this is infuriating. How many Chinese people pay income taxes to fund US programs? The dems keep saying we need to tax more so we can afford this war; I say if we cut off the rest of the world we'll have more than enough money to take care of all US interests. This isn't our problem.
16 posted on 02/03/2002 1:34:27 PM PST by dubyas_vision
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: dubyas_vision
What an excellent question!!!!!!!
18 posted on 02/03/2002 1:43:01 PM PST by Mfkmmof4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Gritty
Our FDA is currently allowing Red China to manufacture RU486 for American women and the Third World poor. They can use these profits of killing off American babies in the womb to kill more of their own babies.

While China Bans [RU486]Abortion Pill. See story at this link.
http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewPrint.asp?Page=\Culture\archive\200110\CUL20011022b.html

The United States of America should not spend one dime on United Nations' population control schemes.

I thought the pro-aborts were in favor of keeping government out of their bedrooms?

19 posted on 02/03/2002 1:45:54 PM PST by victim soul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Robert_Paulson2
He's moving the ball downfield on this one. A Bravo Zulu for the man. ("Bravo Zulu" is Navy lingo for "Well Done!")
20 posted on 02/03/2002 1:46:20 PM PST by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson