Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

*Fading photos* Photopoint comes up blank, frustrating digital camera users
msNBC ^ | 01.05.01 | Lisa Somebody that tells us squat!

Posted on 01/05/2002 9:47:05 PM PST by Registered

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: agitator ; Chapita
The Future

Stay Safe !

21 posted on 01/05/2002 11:30:06 PM PST by Squantos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Comment #22 Removed by Moderator

To: Squantos
Light of Other Days, Bob Shaw, 1972. The premise of the story was "slow glass". Light took 20 years to pass through it. Maybe it's about to be invented.
23 posted on 01/05/2002 11:56:08 PM PST by Uncle Sausage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Sausage
??? really now .....I'll have to give that a read. Thanks !

Stay Safe !

24 posted on 01/05/2002 11:58:03 PM PST by Squantos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Registered


PhotoPoint Still MIA, Epson's PhotoCenter Knocked Out
 
by Michael Bartlett

PhotoPoint.com, a popular but troubled picture-sharing Web site, has been offline for a week. Parent company Pantellic Software's Web site also is down, and this week, Pantellic took Epson's PhotoCenter site down with it.

PhotoPoint went out of business in July and was acquired by Pantellic - a company that builds online photo services for businesses and was the original creator of PhotoPoint. Pantellic purchased PhotoPoint from Sherwood Partners, a crisis management firm that was liquidating PhotoPoint's assets.

Neither company could be reached for comment on this story.

Keith Kratzberg, the director of photo imaging at Epson, said his company launched its PhotoCenter in April, with PhotoPoint as its third-party vendor "powering" the site. Because of PhotoPoint's troubles, Epson switched to Pantellic in July, he said.

Even before Pantellic went dark last Friday, Epson was preparing for the eventuality that it would have to take its photo-sharing site in-house, he said. On Wednesday, Epson decided to turn off the site in order to preserve the photos customers already had stored.

"With a site like this, you hate to go dark for any period," said Kratzberg. "We were prepared to go in-house, but it happened more suddenly than expected. But when we could see that Pantellic could no longer support our site, it was more important to keep our members' photo albums intact, rather than try to maximize the time we were up."

The people who paid money to put their images online are upset with PhotoPoint for disappearing without a trace. Many of these former customers vented their ire on the F--kedcompany site this week.

An individual posting under the handle, "wddbear," wrote, "I have over 950 photos stored there, and they better find a way for me to get them. I paid for a full year and some of those pictures cannot be replaced. I smell a lawsuit coming."

Another customer, "gladIpaid," wrote, "Glad I just paid for more space. Goodbye $60.00. No notice, no replies to customer concerns, no information for paying customers, no parent site - not even a splashpage telling us we're f--ked."

In a later post, "gladIpaid" added, "Well, although I do have copies of all my photos, when I think about the hours that went into photoshopping them and all the caption information I lost, it makes me mad."

Wendell Evans, a freelance journalist based in Philadelphia, Pa., and a former PhotoPoint customer, told Newsbytes the loss of caption information is the most galling part of the situation to him.

Evans said he had about 350 photos, letters and newspaper clips on the PhotoPoint system. He is preparing a book on his family's migration across the United States dating back several generations. Through his research, he has discovered 500 living relatives, and gathered numerous pictures and documents.

"PhotoPoint was a gathering point, a way to involve all those people," said Evans. "Now, all of those images have vanished into the ether for all I know. It is not so much a loss of money, but it is a loss of convenience and time."

Evans said he will have to re-upload 350 items, and recreate the descriptions.

"The biggest problem is the captions. They only existed on the PhotoPoint Web site," he said. "I have the information, but I will have to go back through my notes and reunite each photo with the notes. That is a huge loss of time. I am not back to square one, but I am back to square four."

One F--kedcompany poster who identified him or herself as "Tannis" and said he or she was a former PhotoPoint employee, defended the company. Tannis wrote, "businesses succeed, businesses fail, businesses face challenges that most customers never have the opportunity to grasp the concept of just exactly what went wrong."

"I am confident that if at all possible, PhotoPoint will be back online, and if not, they will make every attempt possible to ensure their users get the opportunity to (retrieve) their photos," Tannis added.

Even if that turns out to be true, Evans said he still is upset about the way the company handled things.

"It is incredible. I am really annoyed they disappeared without an e-mail or anything," he said. "They could have told us, 'hey, the business didn't work.' It is the deception that bothers me. They don't even return phone calls. They belong in the cybersleaze hall of fame."

Photopoint.com used to be at http://www.photopoint.com .

Pantellic Software used to be at http://www.pantellic.com .


25 posted on 01/06/2002 12:53:38 AM PST by stlnative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: agitator
I see! Thanks!
26 posted on 01/06/2002 1:15:52 AM PST by Chapita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Comment #27 Removed by Moderator

After getting hosed by Geocities, then Tripod and finally Yahoo over my pics, I broke down and got my own domain for a one time fee $35.00. I pay $15.00 a month for 25 megs of space. I store my pics on my hard drive as backup and if, for some reason my server company goes belly up, I just FTP my pics to a new server company. All my pic links remain since my domain name hasn't changed.

I'm sure there are cheaper server hosts than my $15.00 service per month. You just have to do some research to find them. I paid a bit more to have the reliability of backups and tech support.

28 posted on 01/06/2002 2:30:12 AM PST by spectr17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Registered
Another dot.com bankruptsy scam I suppose.
29 posted on 01/06/2002 4:52:33 AM PST by chainsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Registered
I have been trying to find out what happened to Photopoint!

All pictures I had linked on FR were stored there.

They took my money and ran. I will check out Shutterfly.

30 posted on 01/06/2002 6:10:35 AM PST by Budge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Registered
One panicked user told him every photo he’d taken of his toddler was stored on Photopoint.

And, like a toddler, he had exhibited no foresight in making backup copies on his own HD or media.
31 posted on 01/06/2002 6:21:15 AM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brigette
The company could at least have used the money that its subscribers were *still* paying it to keep their servers up long enough to say goodbye. My guess is that they dragged their bandwidth bills out long enough that their provider cut them off, or that their landlord locked them out.
32 posted on 01/06/2002 6:34:59 AM PST by kezekiel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Registered
Frankly, I'm surprised this story isn't all over the place. 1.2 million users just sitting around picking their noses?

Frankly, I'm surprised that anyone would be stupid enough to not have a copies of important photos stored locally.

I can see using resources like Photopoint as an online "showcase", but anyone was using it as their only source of storage is an idiot.

33 posted on 01/06/2002 6:37:10 AM PST by AAABEST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chapita
Storing your images on a floppy is not a good idea, they tend to go bad over time. So far CD's are a good bet, but the technology is changing so fast that cd's will probably be outdated in a very short time, leaving you with CD's that you won't have a way to read.
34 posted on 01/06/2002 6:45:00 AM PST by HapHaszard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Sausage
"I store my images on my hard disk and a Zip disk as well. Hope to get them on a CDRW someday"

My new puter came with a burner and it's great for storing photos.

An 800mb cd will hold around 400 photos.

My Nikon digital camera easily and quickly loads photos straight to cd.

As far as durability, I have 10 year old music cd's that still work.

35 posted on 01/06/2002 6:46:03 AM PST by Vigilantcitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: AAABEST
I can't agree with you more!
36 posted on 01/06/2002 7:07:25 AM PST by Registered
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: agitator
Good point. Wasn't the Libary of Congress supposed to do something about this?

By the way FREEPERS just what is the BEST photo hosting site?

Now that I have XP and it seems to be willing to do just about everything for me with photos (love that new pic of W's portrait I have hanging on my wall!) I may join the ranks of REAL band width users around here.

37 posted on 01/06/2002 8:37:34 AM PST by mercy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Snow Bunny;Uncle George
Is your site gone too dear? I am so sorry, it was great.
38 posted on 01/06/2002 8:47:33 AM PST by Uncle George
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Registered
I heard that Al Gore invented Photopoint.com.
39 posted on 01/06/2002 8:58:27 AM PST by Boss_Jim_Gettys
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Registered
. One panicked user told him every photo he’d taken of his toddler was stored on Photopoint.

What kind of idiot puts the only copies of his digital photos on a server over which he has no control?

I had a ton of pictures at photopoint but kept copies of all of them burned on CD's. Luckily for me I have access to several web servers and plenty of drive space as alternative web storing sites. But hey $20 a year, you gets what you pay for in life.

40 posted on 01/06/2002 9:48:17 AM PST by Cacique
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson