This article and spin were inevitable and the main beneficiary is the Queen herself.
Posted on 12/18/2001 7:36:57 PM PST by andrew
Edited on 09/03/2002 4:49:48 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
Two years ago, Director of Central Intelligence George J. Tenet phoned the White House. The agency had a lead, he said, on Osama bin Laden.
Reports linked the al Qaeda leader to a temporary encampment in southern Afghanistan. Overhead photographs showed a well-equipped caravan of the sort used by hunters, a commanding figure at its center, and an entourage of escorts bearing arms.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
Next they'll tell us that Neville Chamberlain got "peace in our time" from Hitler, and WWII was just a bad dream.
It prints out to NINE pages. And this is just part one of TWO !
Three times after Aug. 20, 1998, when Clinton ordered the only missile strike of his presidency against bin Laden's organization, the CIA came close enough to pinpointing bin Laden that Clinton authorized final preparations to launch. In each case, doubts about the intelligence aborted the mission...
More than once, advisers recall, Clinton sounded out Gen. Henry H. Shelton, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, about the prospect of using Special Forces to surprise bin Laden's fighters on the ground. But Clinton declined to authorize the large-scale operation that Shelton said would be required, and he chose not to order a less ambitious option to which the general would have objected.
Amid all of the spin there are germs of truth...
I've been sitting on some info under the "loose lips" principle, but this article makes that no longer necessary. An Academy buddy of my cousin, himself a former Air Force pilot, is a Delta Force pilot. According to him, we had bin Laden "in our crosshairs" three times during the Clinton years, but couldn't get the kill order from higher up. His conclusion from the field was the reason for this failure was nothing more than a lack of the political will to get the job done.
Which leads, yet again, to the obvious question:
Would the attacks of 9/11 have happened, had President Clinton been up to the job with which he was entrusted?
Oh, wait a minute, they're mostly read in Washington DC, so mayble they can get away with it there. We all know what rubes they are in the beltway.
Absolutely not, amigo. Five years ago, Sudan was practically begging Clinton to extradite him to the U.S.
Thanks for the Sudanese link, pardner.
Of course, I don't believe a word of their little 9-page scenario. The problem I have with it is this: it's overkill to the max which only makes them look twice as guilty. The other problem I have with this is the media's complicity in the whole sharade.
You're welcome, my friend.
Another very important question, as mentioned above, who the heck leaked all of this? There is a good chace this will blow field agents cover!
Shelton comes off as a good man !
Shelton, a senior colleague said, "wanted nothing to do" with a tiny incursion known in the Special Forces community as "going Hollywood." And the political leadership, the colleague said, wanted nothing to do with something larger.
Clinton's MO for sure!
never let a dimmacrat run a war!
Taking out bin Laden would have used too much of the political capital in the Middle East that Clinton wasted while attempting to purchase peace as his legacy. If intel was produced that demanded action detrimental to his agenda, Clinton simply manipulated the system or changed the rules to produce the desired result.
As always, Clinton placed his own needs before those of the nation.
I've been sitting on some info under the "loose lips" principle, but this article makes that no longer necessary. An Academy buddy of my cousin, himself a former Air Force pilot, is a Delta Force pilot. According to him, we had bin Laden "in our crosshairs" three times during the Clinton years, but couldn't get the kill order from higher up. His conclusion from the field was the reason for this failure was nothing more than a lack of the political will to get the job done.
Which leads, yet again, to the obvious question:
Would the attacks of 9/11 have happened, had President Clinton been up to the job with which he was entrusted?
BIG, Swelling, Bleeding, Crying, Why is this man NOT IN PRISON Bump???
(((PING))))))
Please let me know if you want ON or OFF my ping list!. . .don't be shy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.