Ask yourself if someone like Maxine Waters should have any access to privileged information under any circumstances.
Ahh, change the rules when the 'pubs are in power - wouldn't want those "evil liberals" in our government to have access to "priveledged information" now.
Bush realizes that some action must occur and occur NOW to correct many wrongs, and to (like Regan did in the early 1980's) to bring back American Pride, Civility, and Honor. It is a tough job. But it can be done.
But accomplishing this task requires a realistic apprasial of who your allies are and who are you enemies. he has, I am sure, Correctly identified whom he can trust and whom he cannot. I don't think that he want's retribution for past crimes (as many democrats fear), but rather to totally clean up the system.
Look at how he is doing it.
Is there any public proclamations of this? No. It is all being done strategically and tactically. He had constructed a plan and is now working the plan. Don't be so fearful fellow freepers...
To: Oldeconomybuyer
While any attempt by a government official to hide evidence from the public is not good, please keep in mind that when Congress subpoenas these documents they do not have to release them to the public themselves.
Ask yourself if someone like Maxine Waters should have any access to privileged information under any circumstances.
# 16 by Alberta's Child
************************
The short answer is yes, Alberta's Child.
Maxine Waters is a public official, put in power by the voters in her district.
She has a real need for access to information in order to do her job.
If she abuses that sacred trust, impeach and procecute her.
Should Maxine Waters have access to air?