Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child; Oldeconomybuyer; JD86

************************

To: Oldeconomybuyer
While any attempt by a government official to hide evidence from the public is not good, please keep in mind that when Congress subpoenas these documents they do not have to release them to the public themselves.

Ask yourself if someone like Maxine Waters should have any access to privileged information under any circumstances.
# 16 by Alberta's Child

************************

The short answer is yes, Alberta's Child.

Maxine Waters is a public official, put in power by the voters in her district.
She has a real need for access to information in order to do her job.
If she abuses that sacred trust, impeach and procecute her.

119 posted on 12/13/2001 7:54:12 AM PST by exodus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: exodus
I understand your point, but I find it thoroughly unacceptable that someone who is as dumb as a bag of rocks has access to information that I do not have, especially when she has been elected to her position by a bunch of OJ jurors.
126 posted on 12/13/2001 8:05:38 AM PST by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson