Posted on 12/13/2001 6:02:13 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
Edited on 04/13/2004 2:39:12 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
06:57 PST WASHINGTON (AP) -- President Bush has invoked executive privilege for the first time to keep Congress from seeing documents of prosecutors' decision-making in cases ranging from decades-old Boston murders to the Clinton-era fund-raising probe, The Associated Press has learned.
(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...
Ahh, change the rules when the 'pubs are in power - wouldn't want those "evil liberals" in our government to have access to "priveledged information" now.
I'd love to know the answer to that myself.
Thanks for the post, OEB! Here's a related article - is this the SAME issue, OEB???? Notice that Ashcroft was to have answered this subpoena by 5 pm on Sept 11th, the day of the WTC hijackings!:
Breaking: US Congress Subpoena Orders Ashcroft To Release Clinton Evidence on Sept. 11, 2001
(((PING))))))
Tell me if you want OFF or ON my ping list - don't be shy. . .
Aware the White House was considering such a new policy, members of Congress have raised concerns that it will hinder lawmakers from giving proper oversight to federal prosecutions, noting scandals in the past would never have been exposed if Congress had been kept from sensitive documents.
If members of Congress don't like it, that tell's you something. If having access to these documents allowed exposure of scandals by Congress, why do scandals have to be exposed by everyone else but Congress? And why when Congress has full access to these scandals, do they go stick their head in the sand ??????
I have a feeling the words "giving proper oversight" means deciding what they want to keep buried to cover their own asses!
And GW chooses the third option - Not at all!
Frankly, I think the Pres. is kicking himself by doing this.
Covering up the FBI's and Reno's mistakes is not the proper way to go,
and will have serious repercussions in the future, like when the world finds out who did FL800.
Bush realizes that some action must occur and occur NOW to correct many wrongs, and to (like Regan did in the early 1980's) to bring back American Pride, Civility, and Honor. It is a tough job. But it can be done.
But accomplishing this task requires a realistic apprasial of who your allies are and who are you enemies. he has, I am sure, Correctly identified whom he can trust and whom he cannot. I don't think that he want's retribution for past crimes (as many democrats fear), but rather to totally clean up the system.
Look at how he is doing it.
Is there any public proclamations of this? No. It is all being done strategically and tactically. He had constructed a plan and is now working the plan. Don't be so fearful fellow freepers...
Regards,
Hehe.. He's a darn good poker player too. Ain't he?
Yup, for him, daddy and even clinton.
Thank you! This seems more in keeping with this administration's policies and character than the supposition that President Bush is purposefully covering up Clinton's crimes. It would be terrible for people like Waxman or Conyers to have access to that information. They would do their best to assure that Clinton would never go to trial. I agree with you that this will stop the liberal media from spinning the case out of control.
Crime/Corruption Front Page News
Source: Washington Weekly
Published: 8/1/99 Author: Marvin Lee
Posted on 08/01/1999 12:16:11 PDT by Thanatos
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.