Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

**Bush invokes executive privilege to keep Justice Department documents secret**
AP ^ | 12-13-01 | John Solomon

Posted on 12/13/2001 6:02:13 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer

Edited on 04/13/2004 2:39:12 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

06:57 PST WASHINGTON (AP) -- President Bush has invoked executive privilege for the first time to keep Congress from seeing documents of prosecutors' decision-making in cases ranging from decades-old Boston murders to the Clinton-era fund-raising probe, The Associated Press has learned.


(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 381-389 next last
To: Alberta's Child
Ask yourself if someone like Maxine Waters should have any access to privileged information under any circumstances.

Ahh, change the rules when the 'pubs are in power - wouldn't want those "evil liberals" in our government to have access to "priveledged information" now.

21 posted on 12/13/2001 6:17:06 AM PST by FreeTally
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
exactly. My wonder is if this may be related to current and future investigations, to keep Waxman types from trying to get a heads up and a warning, kinda like that Florida grand juror this week.
22 posted on 12/13/2001 6:17:14 AM PST by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
DOJ Under Janet Ashcroft - Has Anything Changed?

.

23 posted on 12/13/2001 6:17:31 AM PST by Elle Bee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer; t-shirt; Snow Bunny; Republican Wildcat; Howlin; Fred Mertz; .30Carbine...
Why?...

I'd love to know the answer to that myself.

Thanks for the post, OEB! Here's a related article - is this the SAME issue, OEB???? Notice that Ashcroft was to have answered this subpoena by 5 pm on Sept 11th, the day of the WTC hijackings!:

Breaking: US Congress Subpoena Orders Ashcroft To Release Clinton Evidence on Sept. 11, 2001


(((PING))))))
Tell me if you want OFF or ON my ping list - don't be shy. . .

24 posted on 12/13/2001 6:18:24 AM PST by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Yes, why?
25 posted on 12/13/2001 6:19:23 AM PST by d4now
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Here is the reason I believe Bush is doing this for the right reason and not to misuse it.

Aware the White House was considering such a new policy, members of Congress have raised concerns that it will hinder lawmakers from giving proper oversight to federal prosecutions, noting scandals in the past would never have been exposed if Congress had been kept from sensitive documents.

If members of Congress don't like it, that tell's you something. If having access to these documents allowed exposure of scandals by Congress, why do scandals have to be exposed by everyone else but Congress? And why when Congress has full access to these scandals, do they go stick their head in the sand ??????

I have a feeling the words "giving proper oversight" means deciding what they want to keep buried to cover their own asses!

26 posted on 12/13/2001 6:19:55 AM PST by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve50
I think you hit on it. They have reached the point where they hang together or they hang seperately.

And GW chooses the third option - Not at all!

27 posted on 12/13/2001 6:20:29 AM PST by FreeTally
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
The reason: Dubbya wants to put a bug up Larry Klayman's a**.
Larry already had someone at the DOJ tell him that Dubbya would thwart his efforts.

Frankly, I think the Pres. is kicking himself by doing this.
Covering up the FBI's and Reno's mistakes is not the proper way to go,
and will have serious repercussions in the future, like when the world finds out who did FL800.

28 posted on 12/13/2001 6:22:01 AM PST by japaneseghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

So much criminal malfeasance has occurred over the last eight years, that coupled with the criminal activites prior to it, that accurate attacking of the crimes and problems are currently impossible. the Congress and the various agencies have been staffed with Democratic-fanatics that would do anything to further their cause.

Bush realizes that some action must occur and occur NOW to correct many wrongs, and to (like Regan did in the early 1980's) to bring back American Pride, Civility, and Honor. It is a tough job. But it can be done.

But accomplishing this task requires a realistic apprasial of who your allies are and who are you enemies. he has, I am sure, Correctly identified whom he can trust and whom he cannot. I don't think that he want's retribution for past crimes (as many democrats fear), but rather to totally clean up the system.

Look at how he is doing it.

Is there any public proclamations of this? No. It is all being done strategically and tactically. He had constructed a plan and is now working the plan. Don't be so fearful fellow freepers...

George W. is one of US. In more ways than you can imagine...


29 posted on 12/13/2001 6:23:08 AM PST by vannrox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Hmmm... I'm not sure what all would be meant by "prosecutorial decision-making documents", but it sounds like transcripts and minutes from meetings with legal counsel. So, then to be fair: does congress release information of this kind when THEY are getting confidential counsel? Methinks not.
30 posted on 12/13/2001 6:24:34 AM PST by Ramius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer; betty boop
Still contend the BoR only restricts congess?

Regards,

31 posted on 12/13/2001 6:25:19 AM PST by Triple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
George W. is one of US. In more ways than you can imagine...

Hehe.. He's a darn good poker player too. Ain't he?

32 posted on 12/13/2001 6:27:03 AM PST by isthisnickcool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: FreeTally
It's about covering his butt

Yup, for him, daddy and even clinton.

33 posted on 12/13/2001 6:27:37 AM PST by horsewhispersc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: FreeTally
I am soooo glad we have someone on Free Republic who has insider knowledge as to what and why the president does what he does.
34 posted on 12/13/2001 6:29:00 AM PST by elephantlips
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican
Never show your hand until the right time.

Thank you! This seems more in keeping with this administration's policies and character than the supposition that President Bush is purposefully covering up Clinton's crimes. It would be terrible for people like Waxman or Conyers to have access to that information. They would do their best to assure that Clinton would never go to trial. I agree with you that this will stop the liberal media from spinning the case out of control.

35 posted on 12/13/2001 6:29:36 AM PST by theophilusscribe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat
Two Possibilities There may be those in congress that may be the suspects or in bed with the suspects. Remember earlier leaks??? Just after 9-11. That leak may be excuse no person can overcome. PLUS on T V last week Clinton's first CIA director Woolsey stated flatly that we had access to Osama's cell phone calls THEN that was leaked and the PRESS went with it???? Not a big story then BUT what if no leak???????????????????????
36 posted on 12/13/2001 6:29:49 AM PST by meducksguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: All
(For the record:

"Loral, Inc. Shareholders file federal lawsuit against Loral Inc, Bill & Hillary Clinton,
Al Gore and John Haung for Conspiracy!"

Crime/Corruption Front Page News
Source: Washington Weekly
Published: 8/1/99 Author: Marvin Lee
Posted on 08/01/1999 12:16:11 PDT by Thanatos

37 posted on 12/13/2001 6:30:07 AM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

One may agree or disagree with Bush's decision, but there is a qualitative difference between invoking executive privilege in a case where the President has been accused of malfeasance, and invoking it in cases not involving the President personally. The attempt to equate this with the actions of Nixon or Clinton is a smear.
38 posted on 12/13/2001 6:30:09 AM PST by Reg Niwthgir
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Translation=Bush decides to keep the FBI files or his own potential use. (This means you too Trent Lott)
39 posted on 12/13/2001 6:30:53 AM PST by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican
"Justice is prevailing across the land!! Here it comes!"

More like the circle jerk across the land.
40 posted on 12/13/2001 6:31:19 AM PST by gjenkins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 381-389 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson