Are liberal Democrats the new black helicopter loonies?

Captal de Buch | 12-10-01 | Captal de Buch

[Captal de Buch]

Are the liberal Democrats becoming the black helicopter loonies of the new millennium?

 

Remember the black helicopter loonies of the 90’s? Linda Thompson, Mark from Michigan and the other crazies, remember how all their stupid ranting seem to stick to conservatives like Velcro? Those bozos created all sorts of credibility problems for anyone who spoke up about issues in the Clinton administration. Any time a conservative criticized the Clinton administration he or she would be dismissed as just another Clinton hating black helicopter loony. This dismissible conservative credibility in the eyes of the American public seemed to embolden Clinton to do what he damn well pleased without fear of retribution from the public, even to the point of lying to Congress and the American people.

 

Is the shoe on the other foot now?

 

Charles Schumer, Maxine Waters and others from the left appear have taken up the mantel of un-credible loonies whose words and actions are destroying any credibility the Democrats have when it comes to criticizing the Republicans and the Bush administration. Their ranting doesn’t seem to change Bush’s popularity ratings, in fact they make it look like the Democratic Party agenda is simply a sour grapes plot to get Bush.

 

Do the Republicans realize this? If they do realize this can they take advantage of the situation or will the innate Republican fear of doing something stupid turn into another round of not doing anything at all?

[VA Advogado]

Imagine that ? LOL The supposed " Constitutional scholar " hasn't an iota of an idea WHAT is in the Constitution, that he LOVES to claim he knows.

I am not directing this comment to Demidog personally, but I do find that most of the libertarians, and keyboard constitutionalists on here haven't a clue what the document says. Its really rather embarassing.

[DAGO]

Aint that the truth! Kinda like professional wrestling! One minuite this one is on top,the next the other.But ya know what,its closer then one thinks.Like in professional wrestling,the out come is already determined!!!Yes it is a CONSPIRACY!!!!Only its not a "Vast Right Wing" conspiracy,Its a Vast "Global Elitest" one.Communism is said to be for the pesants,but in fact it is the ULTRA RICH who funded the revolution.Where do you think the Soviets got the "ARM & Hammer" looking thing from?HHHHMMMMMMM.

COMRADE DAGOSAVITCH
COMMUNIST AGENT
OCCUPIED USSA!!!
ZEIG HEIL^5

[Demidog]

I can assure you that your position, if promoted, is both a repudiation to our founders statements and dangerous to yourself.

[VA Advogado]

Nor should federal laws make states prohibit it, but the states should ban it on their own.

And they have. I am sure even California bans child porn. The problem is when you cross state lines with it. Thats when we need the feds to step in and arrest.

[Demidog]

You are a liar and a coward.

[realpatriot71]

Looks like I made your list. :-)

Is this supposed to hurt my feelings?

[Demidog]

Taking something from one state to another is not "interstate commerce." I hate to break the news to you on that one but there you go.

[motzman]

You were thouroughly trounced by everyone on the thread. The song was for $hits and giggles. Go learn something.

[VA Advogado]

You were thouroughly trounced by everyone on the thread. The song was for $hits and giggles. Go learn something.

Whats that saying: Even as one you're still a majority if you're right.

[Doctor Doom]

This disgusts me.

Right. This from the resident cat fancier.

[Senator Pardek]

If I were a lifelong resident of countries besides the U.S., and having been not captured in the U.S., and not having signed on to the Geneva Convention- I would tend to agree.

[VA Advogado]

Taking something from one state to another is not "interstate commerce." I hate to break the news to you on that one but there you go.

It is when its sold.

[motzman]

You just dumped a dope song on the thread. Go back to your doobie.

How can I? Those types of flowers are illegal.

Such a wit.

[Doctor Doom]

Most of the libertarian bent don't always follow our thinking even on this.

Incorrect, cat man. Libertarians support all laws which criminalize the violation of individual rights.

[VA Advogado]

Taking something from one state to another is not "interstate commerce." I hate to break the news to you on that one but there you go.

INTERSTATE COMMERCE - Commerce between any place in a State and any place outside of that State, or within any possession of the United States (not including the Canal Zone) or the District of Columbia, and commerce between places within the same State but through any place outside of that State. 18 U.S.C.

[Demidog]

Don't agree. I really don't care if you agree or not. Either you have rights independent of what the govenrment says, or they are granted to you by Geneva or whatever country you happen to live in.

If you don't have inalienable rights, then our founders were liars. Why not just speak out and say so?

[VA Advogado]

Libertarians support all laws which criminalize the violation of individual rights.

Even laws against abortion?

[Demidog]

Thanks for the definition but it in no way disagrees with my statement. I knew the definition already.

[motzman]

Yeah, that's right, it was only me trouncing you on that thread. Just liittle ole me, all by myself.

Living in denial is dangerous....