Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate GOP gives up on energy vote
CBS.MarketWatch.com ^ | 12/03/2001 | William L. Watts

Posted on 12/03/2001 3:09:13 PM PST by GeneD

WASHINGTON (CBS.MW) - Senate Republicans on Monday decided to fight another day for energy legislation that would open a portion of Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to oil and gas exploration.

The full Senate voted 94-1 not to cut off debate on a Republican amendment to a railroad pensions bill. The GOP amendment contained much of a House-passed energy package and a six-month moratorium on human cloning.

Republicans would've needed 60 votes to end debate -- a tall order in the upper chamber, where Democrats hold a slight 50-49 advantage by virtue of Vermont Sen. James Jeffords' decision to bolt the GOP and become a Democratic-aligned independent earlier this year.

Republicans contend they have enough support in the Senate to prevail on the drilling issue in an up-or-down vote. In the end, almost all Republicans opted to join Democrats in voting down a motion to end debate, indicating they would instead look to bring the measure to the floor at a later date. Sen. George Allen, R-Va., was the only member to vote in favor of the motion.

The Senate later voted 81-15 to end debate on the railroad pensions bill. Last week, Senate Minority Leader Trent Lott, R-Miss., expressing frustration at Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle's refusal to bring energy legislation to the floor, proposed the amendment to Democratic legislation on railroad pensions. The energy portion of the amendment includes many elements of a bill that passed the House earlier this year, including the controversial ANWR provision.

ANWR drilling has split some Democrats thanks to an intense lobbying effort by some unions, which are traditional Democratic supporters. The Teamsters union has led the charge, arguing that drilling would create hundreds of thousands of jobs.

Environmental groups are vehemently opposed to drilling, contending it would destroy a pristine wilderness. Supporters say extraction could proceed with minimal disruption.

Daschle said the time wasn't right for a vote and has said he would bring a Democratic energy bill to the floor early next year. In addition to the railroad bill, the Senate must deal with defense appropriations, farm legislation, and other issues, including negotiations with the House toward an economic stimulus package.

Monday's developments make it unlikely that Republicans will be able to force an energy vote before Congress finishes business for the year.

Lott acknowledged earlier Monday that it would be difficult to come up with the 60 votes needed to clear the procedural hurdle.

Lott tied the energy proposal to a measure sponsored by Sen. Sam Brownback, R-Kans. that would ban human cloning.

Daschle on Sunday told NBC's "Meet the Press" that he's opposed to human cloning, but added that he wants to explore the issues surrounding the technology.

"Obviously, we're opposed to human cloning, but this opportunity to advance research in the effort to bring about cures for some of the most critical diseases in this country also deserves support, and we've got to find that balance," he said.

Advanced Cell Technology Inc. a closely held Massachusetts firm, announced last month that it had successfully produced a cloned human embryo. The company has said it wants to use the technology to produce embryos that it would use to harvest medically useful stem cells, not for creating cloned children.

William L. Watts is a reporter for CBS.MarketWatch.com.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
To: Eric in the Ozarks
The Saudi's send their thanks.

So does Saddam.

21 posted on 12/03/2001 3:40:54 PM PST by LoneGOPinCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: The Cajun
What does it take to DUMP Chester Lott from his "Republican Leadership" position in the Senate?

This dope is THE spineless loser of all spineless losers.

22 posted on 12/03/2001 3:49:05 PM PST by Agent Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
Due to welfare reform, the democraps here have no political funding. The free handouts aren't as easy to get ahold of like they used to be.
They need that foreign money!!!
If we drill our own oil, the democraps would have zilch to pay for their re-elections.
They don't want to bite the hand that feeds them.
23 posted on 12/03/2001 3:55:18 PM PST by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat
Nice spin.
24 posted on 12/03/2001 3:56:00 PM PST by Eagle Eye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
Actually...if it were actually this bill that was up on the floor, it would have passed because the Republicans have the 50 vote majority needed to pass it. But since they were trying to attach this to an unrelated bill and end debate now, they needed 60 votes, which it appears they couldn't get. Now we're beholden to Daschle to actually put the energy bill on the floor. Yippee. Still...the Republicans should have had the vote anyway to reveal all the people crappy enough to vote against this.
25 posted on 12/03/2001 4:10:17 PM PST by DallasJ7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasJ7
I would agree, however the only answer to this nasty senate problem we are having is to elect more votes to the senate. We must retake that body.
26 posted on 12/03/2001 4:24:22 PM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: NC Conservative
Throw in a pair of cajones and you might get half way to a conservative RINO.
Remember: "Lotts For Sale"
27 posted on 12/03/2001 4:24:47 PM PST by RadicalRik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
Let me get this straight...we're in a war in the Middle East and the Senate is considering a railroad pensions bill before national energy legislation--and the GOP cannot win the argument that Dashole is putting partisan concerns over national security?! Lott and company are beyond hope.
28 posted on 12/03/2001 4:26:54 PM PST by spf29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
by virtue of Vermont Sen. James Jeffords' decision to bolt the GOP and become a Democratic-aligned independent earlier this year

Jeffords is a traitor, just like his buddy Abdul hippie Hamid.

29 posted on 12/03/2001 4:31:09 PM PST by Rome2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
Think how popular Republicans would be if they once, just once, put up a fight for something the country wants and desperately needs!
30 posted on 12/03/2001 4:31:17 PM PST by teletech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneD

Senate GOP gives up

Thank God that President Bush doesn't lead the war the way Lott "leads" the Senate GOP.

Dan

31 posted on 12/03/2001 4:36:52 PM PST by BibChr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat
"...this is actually better than usual for the Senate GOP."

They did fine. And the Senate GOP will do much better a year from now - when they pick up 4, maybe 5 seats. I believe that this coming Nov., the Democrats have 17 Senator seats up for grabs/it'll be our turn to kick some butt - and regain control of the Senate!!

32 posted on 12/03/2001 4:39:54 PM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ChaseR
Hold on a sec. The repubs have many more seats coming up to re-election than the Dems. We're not at all expected to pick up four seats. Besides, it barely matters with Lott in charge. Bring in Nickles already.
33 posted on 12/03/2001 4:58:53 PM PST by PianoMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
DIS GUST ING!!!
34 posted on 12/03/2001 5:19:06 PM PST by OldFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasJ7
Yeah, much as I'd love to ladel some more garbage on Lott, the Senate rules made it a moot subject: Lott could have had the backbone of a bull elephant (nice metaphor, eh?) and it would've made no difference at all. Without the 60 votes (11 Rats) there's absolutely nothing on heaven or earth that could be done about it -- they'd have lost the vote 5 minutes later anyway.

The blame on this one really belongs to Daschle and no one else.

35 posted on 12/03/2001 5:27:08 PM PST by Scott from the Left Coast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: spf29
GOP cannot win the argument that Dashole is putting partisan concerns over national security

Oh, they can probably win the arguement all day long. It wouldn't matter a whit. If you don't have 60 votes you don't have 60 votes, and you can win every arguement for 1,000 years and still lose the vote. And unlike squirrely Republicans, the Rats always stick together enough to win the vote -- they will let the country go to hell long, long before they'll let their party lose a vote.

36 posted on 12/03/2001 5:30:54 PM PST by Scott from the Left Coast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
Hey, Trent Lott: Liberace called. He wants his WIMPINESS back.
37 posted on 12/03/2001 5:41:12 PM PST by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChaseR
"They did fine. And the Senate GOP will do much better a year from now - when they pick up 4, maybe 5 seats. I believe that this coming Nov., the Democrats have 17 Senator seats up for grabs/it'll be our turn to kick some butt - and regain control of the Senate!!"

Sad to say this is not correct. In 2002 there are 20 Republicans and only 14 Democrats up for re-election in the Senate. While I see a hand full we might beat I see some we could lose.

38 posted on 12/03/2001 5:48:30 PM PST by HoustonCurmudgeon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: NC Conservative
Way too late for that. Frankly the lack of a sign of life in the Republican Party is disturbing. The only difference between Lott, Jeffords and most of the other so-called Republicans is the name they attach to them selves. They vote with the Senate Democrats more often than with the House Republicans.
39 posted on 12/03/2001 5:48:56 PM PST by B. A. Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: B. A. Conservative
THIS MAKES ME SICK!! lott needs to go. i feel sorry for bush - the masses our supporting him but the republican power brokers duck and cover
40 posted on 12/03/2001 5:58:18 PM PST by americanusa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson