Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GeneD
Actually...if it were actually this bill that was up on the floor, it would have passed because the Republicans have the 50 vote majority needed to pass it. But since they were trying to attach this to an unrelated bill and end debate now, they needed 60 votes, which it appears they couldn't get. Now we're beholden to Daschle to actually put the energy bill on the floor. Yippee. Still...the Republicans should have had the vote anyway to reveal all the people crappy enough to vote against this.
25 posted on 12/03/2001 4:10:17 PM PST by DallasJ7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DallasJ7
I would agree, however the only answer to this nasty senate problem we are having is to elect more votes to the senate. We must retake that body.
26 posted on 12/03/2001 4:24:22 PM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: DallasJ7
Yeah, much as I'd love to ladel some more garbage on Lott, the Senate rules made it a moot subject: Lott could have had the backbone of a bull elephant (nice metaphor, eh?) and it would've made no difference at all. Without the 60 votes (11 Rats) there's absolutely nothing on heaven or earth that could be done about it -- they'd have lost the vote 5 minutes later anyway.

The blame on this one really belongs to Daschle and no one else.

35 posted on 12/03/2001 5:27:08 PM PST by Scott from the Left Coast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson