Skip to comments.
Satellites tell the truth: Reed Irvine exposes CIA cover-up of downed aircraft
WorldNetDaily.com ^
| Saturday, October 13, 2001
| Reed Irvine
Posted on 10/13/2001 12:52:16 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
To: AuntB; nunya bidness; GrandmaC; Washington_minuteman; tex-oma; buffyt; Grampa Dave...
To: JohnHuang2
Bingo
To: JohnHuang2
It cited exemptions (b)(1) and (b)(3), which cover material that must be kept secret in the interest of national defense . . . Just think. Had they admitted that an air liner had been shot down people would have been afraid to fly. The economy might have tanked. People would have been AFRAID . . .
Yep! Cover-up was best . . .
4
posted on
10/13/2001 1:02:28 AM PDT
by
Phil V.
To: JohnHuang2
And Clinton and Hillary (arranged) (covered up) (pick one) the TWA 800 shootdown to win the 1996 election. And Dole didn't expose their treachery because he's a slave to the tri-lateral commission. And Kallstrom admitted he was lying by shouting it to a Washington Post reporter across the room. And Reed Irvine, like Judicial Watch, is broke now that there is no Clinton in the white house, but there will be in 2004 because Hillary is an elephant-ankle, diabolical, devil-worshipping, Taliban supporting bitch. And at least 3,000 sailors and government workers are covering up the shootdown because they (couldn't make at least $10 million for exposing it) (Clinton will kill them like [{he} {she} {both of them} {both of them and Chelsea} {all three of them plus Sox the cat} {pick one}] killed Vince Foster) (pick one). And Bush is covering up the truth of TWA 800 up because... Blah Blah Blah.
--Raoul
To: JohnHuang2
There is a LOT more that FedGov has than the satellite pics that refute the Clinton-coverup of TWA-800. But, I doubt that any of us will ever see it. The clowns we support with our tax dollars are NOT friends of truth. They will lie until their dying day to protect their own hide and their own paycheck.
6
posted on
10/13/2001 1:09:21 AM PDT
by
Ron C.
To: Phil V.; JohnHuang2
Gee, just think if they would have been on the ball and got on the stick, maybe some lives would have been saves...6,000 or so...
7
posted on
10/13/2001 1:14:35 AM PDT
by
Syncro
To: JohnHuang2
the CIA claimed that information was exempt from the Freedom of Information Act. It cited exemptions (b)(1) and (b)(3), which cover material that must be kept secret in the interest of national defense or foreign policy and for the protection of intelligence sources and methods.And now we know not only what that foriegn policy was (ignoring the presence of terrorists on our own soil), we know the results of it. Will anyone in our government be held accountable? I'm not holding my breath.
To: JohnHuang2
"If the CIA has satellite imagery of what transpired and the pictures show that there were no missiles anywhere near the airliner when it blew up, they could have used those pictures to make their case."
Uh huh, yeah, right. Even if this were true, why would the CIA give away an intel source over a downed airliner. We all want the goverment to keep its intel secrets unless it is our pet concern? I think not.
To: Lion's Cub
btt for daylight
To: Syncro
Ya. But they would have frightened children and gurlz.
11
posted on
10/13/2001 1:33:07 AM PDT
by
Phil V.
To: JohnHuang2
... because our spy satellites are targeted at other countries, and not NY????? I would find it extremly strange if we spied with high-resolution satellites on ourselves, especially since we could simply use an airplane to get much better pictures.
To: Ron C.
They will lie until their dying day to protect their own hide and their own paycheck. No, they will protect information that if declassified would disclose intelligence sources, methods, and capabilities. Just because we have it, does not entitle you to see it.
13
posted on
10/13/2001 1:37:56 AM PDT
by
LouD
To: TheLooseThread
Even if this were true, why would the CIA give away an intel source over a downed airliner. You missed the author's point -- This is exactly what the CIA did in the case of the Russian airliner last week.
To: Yellow Rose of Texas; Alamo-Girl
ahhh
15
posted on
10/13/2001 1:59:55 AM PDT
by
amom
To: JohnHuang2
This has been up for over an hour and nobody from the DOD or JD has been here yet? This is a new record. I guess _Jim is off duty.
To: DoughtyOne
hehehehe
To: TheLooseThread
Did mind giving up sources and capabilities over the Black Sea. (Or was it another?) At any rate, it's interesting how open our government is when it's other nation's citizens who died. If it's just our citizens they could care less.
To: JohnHuang2
works for me! thanks for the magic PING, John!
19
posted on
10/13/2001 2:27:23 AM PDT
by
xsmommy
To: JohnHuang2
20
posted on
10/13/2001 2:44:36 AM PDT
by
backhoe
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson