Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AuntB; nunya bidness; GrandmaC; Washington_minuteman; tex-oma; buffyt; Grampa Dave...

2 posted on 10/13/2001 12:52:48 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: JohnHuang2
It cited exemptions (b)(1) and (b)(3), which cover material that must be kept secret in the interest of national defense . . .

Just think. Had they admitted that an air liner had been shot down people would have been afraid to fly. The economy might have tanked. People would have been AFRAID . . .

Yep! Cover-up was best . . .

4 posted on 10/13/2001 1:02:28 AM PDT by Phil V.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
And Clinton and Hillary (arranged) (covered up) (pick one) the TWA 800 shootdown to win the 1996 election. And Dole didn't expose their treachery because he's a slave to the tri-lateral commission. And Kallstrom admitted he was lying by shouting it to a Washington Post reporter across the room. And Reed Irvine, like Judicial Watch, is broke now that there is no Clinton in the white house, but there will be in 2004 because Hillary is an elephant-ankle, diabolical, devil-worshipping, Taliban supporting bitch. And at least 3,000 sailors and government workers are covering up the shootdown because they (couldn't make at least $10 million for exposing it) (Clinton will kill them like [{he} {she} {both of them} {both of them and Chelsea} {all three of them plus Sox the cat} {pick one}] killed Vince Foster) (pick one). And Bush is covering up the truth of TWA 800 up because... Blah Blah Blah.
--Raoul
5 posted on 10/13/2001 1:08:19 AM PDT by RDangerfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
There is a LOT more that FedGov has than the satellite pics that refute the Clinton-coverup of TWA-800. But, I doubt that any of us will ever see it. The clowns we support with our tax dollars are NOT friends of truth. They will lie until their dying day to protect their own hide and their own paycheck.
6 posted on 10/13/2001 1:09:21 AM PDT by Ron C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
... because our spy satellites are targeted at other countries, and not NY????? I would find it extremly strange if we spied with high-resolution satellites on ourselves, especially since we could simply use an airplane to get much better pictures.
12 posted on 10/13/2001 1:37:46 AM PDT by Economist_MA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
works for me! thanks for the magic PING, John!
19 posted on 10/13/2001 2:27:23 AM PDT by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
The CIA claims that it rocketed upward after its entire front end was broken off and that the eyewitnesses mistook it for a missile. That claim and the video that presented it have been the subject of a lot of ridicule by people who are knowledgeable about aeronautics. It was not at all convincing.
Bump.
36 posted on 10/13/2001 7:11:19 PM PDT by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson