Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton in No Rush to Probe Past Intelligence Failures
newsmax ^ | 10.12.01 | newsmax

Posted on 10/12/2001 7:30:25 AM PDT by callisto

Ex-president Bill Clinton, who's been under fire lately for not going after Osama bin Laden agressively enough during his own administration, said Friday that the U.S. should stay focused on the war on terrorism and not get distracted by investigations into past U.S. intelligence failures.

"There will come a time we can look back and say, 'Well, who should have done what, when.' And it ought to be done," Clinton told ABC's "Good Morning America."

"But now is not the time," he insisted.

Clinton's words appeared to be aimed at Connecticut Sen. Joseph Lieberman, who called for a board of inquiry on Thursday into the attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon, saying the U.S. needed to find out why it was so vulnerable.

Since the Sept. 11 attacks, Clinton has seemed obsessed with dodging responsibility for any U.S. intelligence lapses, and has even stopped passers-by on the street to describe his own efforts to get bin Laden.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: backhoe
Since Slick has so much experience dealing with the terrorists, and since he's said that his only goal is to help America, maybe Bush should consider appointing Clinton ambassador to Afghanistan........
21 posted on 10/12/2001 8:31:42 AM PDT by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: callisto
"Clinton in No Rush to Probe Past Intelligence Failures"

And in a related story, "Osama Bin-Laden in No Rush to Probe Past Acts of Terrorism."

22 posted on 10/12/2001 8:34:54 AM PDT by Freemyland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BeAChooser
Problem with the Ron Brown matter is that it looks as if the U.S. military and the CIA were complicit.

However, Muslim terror cells in Bosnia would also appear to have been involved. So it may not be possible to leave the matter uninvestigated.

23 posted on 10/12/2001 8:37:26 AM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
After the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, which killed six and injured 1,000, President Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.

After the 1995 bombing in Saudi Arabia, which killed five U.S. military personnel, Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.

After the 1996 Khobar Towers bombing in Saudi Arabia, which killed 19 and injured 200 U.S. military personnel, Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.

After the 1998 bombing of U.S. embassies in Africa, which killed 224 and injured 5,000, Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.

After the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole, which killed 17 and injured 3 U.S. sailors, Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.

Maybe if Clinton had kept his promise, an estimated 7,000 people would be alive today.

More -

An interesting question: This question was raised on a Philly radio call-in show. Without casting stones, it is a legitimate question. There are two men, both extremely wealthy. One develops relatively cheap software and gives hundreds of millions of dollars to charity. The other sponsors terrorism.

That being the case, why is it that the US government has spent more money chasing down Bill Gates over the past ten years than Osama bin Laden?

It is a strange turn of events. Hillary gets $8 Million for her forthcoming memoirs. Bill gets about $12 Million for his memoirs. This from two people who have spent the past 8 years being unable to recall anything about past events!

Incredible!!

24 posted on 10/12/2001 8:43:18 AM PDT by RetiredArmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
Clinton ambassador to Afghanistan........

I'd like to see X-42 strap on a parachute & a sidearm and volunteer to lead the first stick of Special Forces into the area....

25 posted on 10/12/2001 8:44:34 AM PDT by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: backhoe
CANCEL THAT PARACHUTE!
26 posted on 10/12/2001 8:51:17 AM PDT by meenie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: backhoe, meenie
LOL..but the idea has a certain resonance, dontcha think?..Clinton couldn't turn Bush down..he'd be stuck out there in the middle of nowhere....no broads..other than Taliban honeys...no nothing......the idea kind of grows on you..
27 posted on 10/12/2001 9:01:16 AM PDT by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: callisto
"There will come a time we can look back and say, 'Well, who should have done what, when.' And it ought to be done," Clinton told ABC's "Good Morning America."

"But now is not the time," he insisted.

Sound familiar? Remember these? "The Attorney General (House, Senate...pick one) is looking into that and I can't comment about an ongoing investigation."

He can't hide behind Janet Reno's enormous dress anymore so he'll use a national tragedy.

If not now, when? If not Bill Clinton, who?

28 posted on 10/12/2001 9:18:18 AM PDT by hattend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: callisto
Let's see, Sexual pervert, rapist, liar, thief, and he sold American security down the river. This guy is a puke. Too bad he isn't a wife beater too.
29 posted on 10/12/2001 9:22:24 AM PDT by Joe Boucher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: callisto
What Clinton did during his two terms of office, will be felt by the American people for the next hundred years. If there ever should be a person hunted down for treason and trying to bring down America, it should be Clinton.
30 posted on 10/12/2001 9:28:15 AM PDT by IW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: callisto
Connecticut Sen. Joseph Lieberman, who called for a board of inquiry

Liberman's presidential hopes are showing. He must know any blame that falls on the Clinton admin. will also fall on Gore, effectivly eliminating Gore as a future candidate for president. It will also seriously damage Hillary's chances. Leaving the door open for Liberman.

Right now Bush would seem unbeatable in 2004, but you never know how it will look in 4 years.

Of course, Liberman could also be setting himself up for the first war-time, bipartisan ticket: Bush / Liberman. It sounds strange, but stranger things have happened.

31 posted on 10/12/2001 9:33:21 AM PDT by Brookhaven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marysecretary
Lets hope Barbara Olson's boo does them some real collateral damage.

It does, big time and is well worth reading. I received my copy 2 days ago. I ordered it a month ago from NewsMax.

32 posted on 10/12/2001 10:33:10 AM PDT by wingnuts'nbolts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
Problem with the Ron Brown matter is that it looks as if the U.S. military and the CIA were complicit.

Only a few people at the top of the military (JCS) and perhaps a local commander or two need be involved. Everyone else just did what people in the military are trained to do ... follow orders, regardless. Furthermore, the fact that military colonels with outstanding records put their careers at risk to bring the possibility of murder to light should matter for something. Instead, those men (and women's) careers were utterly DESTROYED and it would appear not even the Bush administration cares.

33 posted on 10/12/2001 1:15:01 PM PDT by BeAChooser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: BeAChooser
I agree with you that the Ron Brown matter should be investigated, and that the whistleblowers are admirable people. I was just trying to suggest why the matter may well not be investigated.
34 posted on 10/12/2001 1:34:38 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Brookhaven
I was asking on Capitol Grilling a couple of weeks ago who the Dems could turn to after Sept. 11. The British Tories turned to Churchill after the coming of WWII discredited the appeasers, and I asked who would be the Dems' Churchill. I had just heard Lieberman speaking at a hearing on terrorism that had been repeated on C-SPAN, and I suggested he might well be the man.

This news from yesterday makes that suggestion seem even more plausible. We certainly do need an inquiry of some sort into the things that went wrong that could allow Sept. 11.

35 posted on 10/12/2001 1:41:46 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
Conclusion of Intelligence Failure Inquiry: While The Bent One was "fiddling" (with various interns' boobs), Rome burned. (and Consiglieri Butchie hid the fire extinguishers.....)
36 posted on 10/12/2001 1:49:02 PM PDT by RooRoobird14
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Joe Boucher
"Let's see, Sexual pervert, rapist, liar, thief, and he sold American security down the river. This guy is a puke. Too bad he isn't a wife beater too.

This SOB has no redeeming qualities whatsoever. :)

37 posted on 10/12/2001 2:14:44 PM PDT by IoCaster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: IoCaster
Oh my merciful God! Thanks so much for all of your comments. I do believe that this excuse for a human could be awarded "The most hated _________ (?) in the U.S., if not the Entire World." (You fill in the blank. I can't think of any more words to use.) He is a friend of anything and anyone Anti-American. My hope is not so much that he will go away as he might, one day, be brought to justice. He and his minions.
38 posted on 10/14/2001 4:51:14 PM PDT by democratsstealvotes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson