To: Know your rights
The democrats are working on a system to tax you for the air you breathe.
A democrat beileves that it is their purpose in life to rob and steal from those that work by taxing them to death and giving some of the money [99% finds it way to the democrat's pocket]to individals who refuse to work in order to buy their votes.
Do the people who pay the taxes care?
Apparently not. They keep electing and re-electing them.
2 posted on
06/10/2004 5:58:29 AM PDT by
sport
(bttt)
To: Know your rights
Among the ideas under consideration is extending the state sales tax to so-called junk food and to beverages such as fruit drinks and bottled iced tea that are not currently taxed. The idea could bring in as much as $100 million for the state.
Just more effing greed to pay for their effing hubris: "Hi, I'm a liberal Democrat. Doing good works is as important a thing as sharing. So I'm going to share with you by doing good works and forcing you, at the penalty of fines or jail, to pay for them."
3 posted on
06/10/2004 6:02:15 AM PDT by
aruanan
To: Know your rights
"contentious issue of revenue increases needed to balance the budget."
Here's a novel idea why don't they cut their spending habits?
Tax on tea (Boston tea party ring a bell?) and computer software. Do they already have a sales' tax?
At first I thought this was going to be one of those we don't want you to eat bad food so we are adding a tax to it for your own benefit kind of stories.
To: Know your rights
And just who is going to decide what is "junk food" and what is a healthy snack? Pizza?...depends on what the ingredients are made of. Yogurt?...some of them have so much sweetener that it's less healthy than Reese's Peanut Butter cups (for the non-allergic, that is). The new Atkins foods?...some are so high in fat you'll have to roll people who eat too much of them around in wheelbarrels.
Governments are going to need a whole new division....for the food police, determining what is healthy and what should be taxed. To paraphrase Dan Quayle, when the government decides what is "junk food", everything is going to be taxed as junk food.
I have a better idea. Why doesn't the government (at all levels) just stop exploiting smokers, let people take whatever nutritional supplements they want, pay for their own prescriptions (just watch the prices go down), and get out of our faces and let us decide how our money is spent. Then they won't need all of this extra tax money.
Grrrrr....... I haven't had a good rant for awhile. <^..^>
5 posted on
06/10/2004 6:10:57 AM PDT by
grania
("Won't get fooled again")
To: Know your rights
Despite reports of progress, there is still a long way to go until a budget agreement is reached. Negotiators still haven't gotten into spending details, including how much of an increase should go for education or Medicaid spending. There isn't even agreement on whether to start with the current budget and add money to programs or to start with Blagojevich's budget plan and make cuts. Blagojevich's budget called for nearly $900 million in spending increases.Wow, maybe I can start budgeting like this!
"Hmmmm... I don't have enough money to cover my bills. I had better start spending more!"
Mark
7 posted on
06/10/2004 6:18:55 AM PDT by
MarkL
(The meek shall inherit the earth... But usually in plots 6' x 3' x 6' deep...)
To: Know your rights
Connecticuts sales tax applies to everything except certian necessary foods. Candy, sodas, etc are not considered necessary foods and are taxed accordingly. Odd that this bill is called a junk food tax.
To: Know your rights
Blagojevich's budget called for nearly $900 million in spending increases.A billion here, a billion there, pretty soon you're talking real money. /sarcasm
9 posted on
06/10/2004 6:20:26 AM PDT by
Just another Joe
(Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
To: Know your rights
For all the folks who want to see a national sales tax, I hope you have no complaints about this tax.
To: Know your rights
"Among the ideas under consideration is extending the state sales tax to so-called junk food and to beverages such as fruit drinks and bottled iced tea that are not currently taxed. "
It was said many times..."block the government control of tobacco, or they will soon go after something YOU LIKE."
It's time for a new "Boston Tea Party".
14 posted on
06/10/2004 6:26:58 AM PDT by
FrankR
(You are enslaved only to the extent of the charity you receive...)
To: Know your rights
"A two-hour meeting in Blagojevich's office Wednesday produced progress, leaders said, including on the contentious issue of revenue increases needed to balance the budget."
I'm laughing my arse off right now, I wonder what the gnatzie pro-tobacco tax increase "convenient conservatives" will say now that their ox is being gored. Goring will eventually hit everyone's consumption choices.
15 posted on
06/10/2004 6:32:41 AM PDT by
CSM
(Liberals may see Saddam's mass graves in Iraq as half-full, but I prefer to see them as half-empty.)
To: Know your rights
Why is it that these people can always come up with schemes to take money from people but can't come up with schemes to cut their spending?
Maybe they should try spending as much time trying to lower taxes than trying to raise them.
![](http://www.unetix.net/fox.jpg)
16 posted on
06/10/2004 6:33:43 AM PDT by
unixfox
(Close the borders, problems solved!)
To: Know your rights; Just another Joe; Great Dane; Madame Dufarge; Gabz; MeeknMing; steve50; ...
OH NO! Not CANDY!!!!!!!!!!!
~snicker
19 posted on
06/10/2004 6:50:21 AM PDT by
SheLion
(Don Imus is voting for FnKerry!)
To: Know your rights
You see, the taxers are using the old divide and split method.
First they tax cigarettes up the ying yang and the 75% or so of the population that doesn't smoke cheered, just as so many did when they banned smoking in bars.
Next up, candy and junk food. I don't eat either but I damn well will NOT support higher taxes on anything.
24 posted on
06/10/2004 7:18:19 AM PDT by
1Old Pro
To: Know your rights
67 posted on
06/11/2004 12:02:16 PM PDT by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson