Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Smoker's saliva a 'cocktail of chemicals'
Yahoo ^ | 06/02/04 | Reuters

Posted on 06/02/2004 4:43:14 AM PDT by Colosis

LONDON (Reuters) - Smoking destroys protective molecules in saliva and transforms it into a dangerous cocktail of chemicals that increases the risk of mouth cancer, scientists say.

"Cigarette smoke is not only damaging on its own, it can turn the body against itself," said Dr Rafi Nagler, of the Technion-Israel Institute of Technology in Haifa, Israel.

Saliva contains antioxidants, molecules that normally protect the body against cancer, but Nagler and his colleagues have discovered that cigarette smoke destroys the molecules and turns saliva into a dangerous compound.

"Our study shows that once exposed to cigarette smoke, our normally healthy saliva not only loses its beneficial qualities but it turns traitor and actually aids in destroying the cells of the mouth and oral cavity," he added.

In research reported in the British Journal of Cancer on Wednesday, Nagler and his team studied the impact of cigarette smoke on cancerous cells in the laboratory.

Half of the cells were exposed to saliva exposed to cigarette smoke and the other half just to the smoke. Cells exposed to the saliva mixture had more damage and it increased along with the time of exposure.

"Most people will find it very shocking that the mixture of saliva and smoke is actually more lethal to cells in the mouth than cigarette smoke alone," Nagler added in a statement.

Smoking and drinking are the leading causes of head and neck or oral cancers, which includes cancer of the lip, mouth, tongue, gums, larynx and pharynx. Nearly 400,000 new cases of the illness are diagnosed worldwide each year with the majority in developing countries. The five-year survival rates are less than 50 percent.

Nagler and his colleagues believe the research could open up new avenues to develop better treatments to prevent oral cancer.

"This insight into how mouth cancer can develop offers more reasons for smokers to try and quit," said Jean King, of Cancer Research UK, which publishes the journal. "People know the link with lung cancer and this research adds compelling evidence about the damage smoking can do to the mouth."


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: health; pufflist; smokers; smoking; smokingbans
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360361-380381-400 ... 901-905 next last
To: Judith Anne

---"Do you have Alzheimer's? I've heard nicotine is being used as a successful treatment for the early stages...
"-----

Smoking Speeds Dementia, Alzheimer's Disease

Smokers Decline Up to Five Times Faster Than Nonsmokers

By Jeanie Lerche Davis
WebMD Medical News Reviewed By Brunilda Nazario, MD
on Monday, March 22, 2004


March 22, 2004 -- Smokers have faster mental decline in elderly years -- up to fivefold faster, a new study shows.


Only a few studies have looked at this link between smoking and mental function in elderly people who don't have dementia or Alzheimer's disease. In recent studies, researchers have found a significantly increased risk of both dementia and Alzheimer's disease among smokers.


Smoking likely puts into effect a vicious cycle of artery damage, clotting, and increased risk of stroke causing mental decline, writes researcher A. Ott, MD, a medical microbiologist with Erasmus University Medical Centre in the Netherlands.


Ott's study appears in this week's issue of the journal Neurology.


The study involves 9,200 men and women over age 65, who were interviewed in their homes about their health and lifestyle, and who took tests measuring their mental function -- these tests are standard measurement used to detect mental impairment in the elderly. They re-took the tests two years later.


361 posted on 06/02/2004 2:27:41 PM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 355 | View Replies]

To: Just another Joe
Judge not lest ye be judged

I didn't judge. I was asked what my criteria was for life choices.

362 posted on 06/02/2004 2:28:56 PM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 342 | View Replies]

To: CSM
It isn't about health, it is about controlling others to your preferances. Fascism, pure and simple.

Saying that smoking is bad for your health is now fascism?

363 posted on 06/02/2004 2:29:35 PM PDT by sakic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 297 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA
Here ya go, Oh Afflicted One:

Good grief, man. Compared with being shot, smoking is a candy-assed risk. Why don't you hoof it down to the local VFW and start your campaign there to get veterans to quit smoking. I'll sure they'll welcome you with open arms. While you're on the way there, think about the sacrifices these and other men made so that you and I would have the right to lead our lives as we see fit.

128 posted on 06/02/2004 10:37:02 AM PDT by Liberal Classic

343 posted on 06/02/2004 2:16:39 PM PDT by cinFLA [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 333 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

364 posted on 06/02/2004 2:29:44 PM PDT by Judith Anne (HOW ARE WE EVER GOING TO CLEAN UP ALL THIS MESS?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 357 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA
Why do you wish that veterans be limited as a sub-class of citizens that have no right to speak except on veterans issues?

I never made this statement, I simply asked a question (which you did not answer) and it is intellectually dishonest to turn that question into a statement of my position.

The point is simple, the fact that this subject touches or affects vets does not move authority on the subject to vets. They are simply a part of the discussion, no more, no less than anyone else who has a stake in this country.

365 posted on 06/02/2004 2:30:02 PM PDT by CyberCowboy777 (Veritas vos liberabit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 339 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne
Doofus! I lifted that from a post you made, quoting another poster.

That's the problem when you lift from posts with going back to the original.

366 posted on 06/02/2004 2:30:03 PM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 358 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion

Since you are not my spiritual authority, I reject anything you have to say on the subject of my spiritual welfare.


367 posted on 06/02/2004 2:31:10 PM PDT by Judith Anne (HOW ARE WE EVER GOING TO CLEAN UP ALL THIS MESS?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 360 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA
Your welcome.

to entire post, not part.

That cannot be a universal statement of position though. Veterans, by virtue of being veterans, do not get the last word of issues that involve or do not involve veterans.

Kerry does not get special position in the debate of ideas simply because he is a vet. Period.

368 posted on 06/02/2004 2:32:22 PM PDT by CyberCowboy777 (Veritas vos liberabit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 357 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA

It's a problem for YOU, maybe. Work on that Alzheimer's, will ya? and see my post just above.

Incidently, anyone who wants to can google Alzheimer's Nicotine research, and learn about some promising studies.


369 posted on 06/02/2004 2:32:53 PM PDT by Judith Anne (HOW ARE WE EVER GOING TO CLEAN UP ALL THIS MESS?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 366 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne

Right. He implied that I had compared smoking with getting shot at. That was his way of twisting my post which made no comparison to smoking and getting shot at. Go back a few posts and see that he was responding to my statement that free cigarettes to soldiers led to many of the smoking related veteran problems.


370 posted on 06/02/2004 2:32:57 PM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 364 | View Replies]

To: laredo44
How is that any of your business?

My opinions are on my private property therefore they are my business.

371 posted on 06/02/2004 2:33:16 PM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 356 | View Replies]

To: sakic
Saying that smoking is bad for your health is now fascism?

Surely you're being deliberately dense.

372 posted on 06/02/2004 2:34:21 PM PDT by laredo44 (Liberty is not the problem..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 363 | View Replies]

To: CyberCowboy777
Doofus! I lifted that from a post you made, quoting another poster.

Those italicized words in your post are not mine but I have posted similar.

373 posted on 06/02/2004 2:34:37 PM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 368 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA

I didn't think he twisted your post. I think you're the one twisting posts, here.

And I happen to agree with that one.


374 posted on 06/02/2004 2:35:03 PM PDT by Judith Anne (HOW ARE WE EVER GOING TO CLEAN UP ALL THIS MESS?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 370 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne

Suit yourself. They were simple questions. If they somehow offend you, maybe its the spirit knocking.


375 posted on 06/02/2004 2:35:17 PM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 367 | View Replies]

To: laredo44
I have said quite clearly here that smoking should be legal. The only bone of contention is between myself and the folks that call it junk science that smoking is bad for you.

And you call me dense.

376 posted on 06/02/2004 2:36:16 PM PDT by sakic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 372 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne

Smoking Does Not Protect the Brain Against Dementia or Alzheimer's Disease
For more about the effects of smoking on health, please visit our Forum on Smoking. And for further information about dementia and Alzheimer's disease, please see our Forums on Dementia and Alzheimer's Disease.

-- Editor, MedicineNet.com





Smoking does not protect against dementia or Alzheimer's disease, according to a study in the British Medical Journal (BMJ), contradicting the implications of some earlier research.

Sir Richard Doll and colleagues from the Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, Radcliffe Infirmary at Oxford reported on observations of over 34,000 male British doctors whose smoking habits have been reviewed every six to 12 years since 1951 to determine the impact on their health. The research team also reviewed the published data on the associations between smoking and Alzheimer's disease.

Over 24,000 of the doctors had died by the end of 1998. Dementia was mentioned on the death certificates of 483. Among 473 whose smoking habits were recorded at least 10 years before their death, when they would not have been influenced by the start of the disease, the prevalence of both Alzheimer's disease and of other types of dementia was similar in both smokers and non-smokers.

If anything, persistent smoking may increase rather than decrease the age specific onset rate of dementia, conclude the authors.

The prior suggestions that smoking might be protective, say the authors, came from studies that were flawed because they were too small, or had relied on information about smoking habits from people other than the sufferers themselves.

In an accompanying editorial Carol Brayne from the Institute of Public Health at Cambridge writes that a protective effect for nicotine is biologically plausible. This is because of the boosting effect of the drug on neurotransmitter systems in the brain, which are damaged in Alzheimer's's disease. But she adds that these effects would be likely to be short-lived.

In the long term, smoking increases the risk of vascular dementia, because it increases the risk of vascular disease in general. "The public health message is clear: at the population level there is no protective effect of smoking in dementia."


377 posted on 06/02/2004 2:36:42 PM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 369 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA

I did not say they were yours.

I was posting the part of MY POST you left out.

You have too many discussions going on and are not keeping up, it is not fair to keep posting to you with three or four others. I'll leave you alone.


378 posted on 06/02/2004 2:36:55 PM PDT by CyberCowboy777 (Veritas vos liberabit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 373 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA

Posted on Fri, May. 28, 2004


List of smoking diseases grows

Surgeon general reports new maladies found to be related to tobacco habits

By Nancy Zuckerbrod

Associated Press


WASHINGTON - The list of diseases linked to smoking grew longer Thursday.

Add acute myeloid leukemia, cancers of the cervix, kidney, pancreas and stomach, abdominal aortic aneurysms, cataracts, periodontitis and pneumonia.

``We've known for decades that smoking is bad for your health, but this report shows that it's even worse,'' said Surgeon General Richard Carmona, announcing his first official assessment of the effects of tobacco.

The report said evidence is not conclusive enough to say smoking causes colorectal cancer, liver cancer, prostate cancer or erectile dysfunction. Some research has associated those diseases with smoking; Carmona said more proof is needed.

The evidence suggests smoking may not cause breast cancer in women but that some women, depending on genetics, may increase their risk of getting it by smoking, the report said.

Diseases previously linked to smoking include cancer of the bladder, esophagus, larynx, lung and mouth. Also tied to smoking was chronic lung disease, chronic heart and cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis, peptic ulcers and reproductive problems.

About 440,000 Americans die of smoking-related diseases each year. The report said more than 12 million people have died from smoking-related diseases in the 40 years since the first surgeon general's report on smoking and health was released in 1964.

That report linked smoking to lung and larynx cancer and chronic bronchitis. Subsequent reports, such as the one released Thursday, have expanded the list of diseases linked to smoking.

Carmona's report said treating smoking-related diseases costs the nation $75 billion annually. The loss of productivity from smoking is estimated to be $82 billion annually.

On average, the surgeon general said, smokers die 13 to 14 years before nonsmokers.

The number of adults who smoke has dropped from about 42 percent in 1965 to about 22 percent in 2002, the last year for which such data is available, according to the surgeon general.

The government has set a goal of 12 percent by 2010, but is having trouble getting the rate to come down as quickly as sought. The smoking rate is declining by less than one-half of a percentage point annually.


379 posted on 06/02/2004 2:37:24 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 361 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA; Judith Anne
Go back a few posts and see that he was responding to my statement that free cigarettes to soldiers led to many of the smoking related veteran problems.

This is a common tactic of cinFLA's.

Post enough comments on a thread to turn it into a virtual vomitorium and then exhort other posters to wade through the ocean of incoherence and try to find which particular rant is being referred to.

Listing other posters' posting times is also a favorite of his, when full-blown psychosis takes over.

380 posted on 06/02/2004 2:37:32 PM PDT by Madame Dufarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 370 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360361-380381-400 ... 901-905 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson