Right. He implied that I had compared smoking with getting shot at. That was his way of twisting my post which made no comparison to smoking and getting shot at. Go back a few posts and see that he was responding to my statement that free cigarettes to soldiers led to many of the smoking related veteran problems.
I didn't think he twisted your post. I think you're the one twisting posts, here.
And I happen to agree with that one.
This is a common tactic of cinFLA's.
Post enough comments on a thread to turn it into a virtual vomitorium and then exhort other posters to wade through the ocean of incoherence and try to find which particular rant is being referred to.
Listing other posters' posting times is also a favorite of his, when full-blown psychosis takes over.
Compared to being shot, smoking IS a candy-a**ed risk. ;-D
No one made that comparison. (This is YOUR remark, cinFLA)
354 posted on 06/02/2004 2:22:54 PM PDT by cinFLA [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 346 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]
You're really out of it. Admit it. You lost. You can't argue. You have a poor memory. You are outclassed.