Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
To: traviskicks
2 posted on
12/26/2007 9:45:25 PM PST by
West Coast Conservative
(Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists.)
To: Revelation 911
3 posted on
12/26/2007 9:45:58 PM PST by
traviskicks
(http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
To: traviskicks
Got'cher asbestos underwear on? [Reaches for the popcorn...]
4 posted on
12/26/2007 9:47:34 PM PST by
dayglored
(Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
To: traviskicks
Reagan was a limited gov't conservative, not an anarchist libertarian. Big difference.
So the answer to the question in the title is an emphatic 'no'.
5 posted on
12/26/2007 9:49:45 PM PST by
Mr. Mojo
To: traviskicks
6 posted on
12/26/2007 9:50:40 PM PST by
Old Sarge
(This tagline in memory of FReeper 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub)
To: traviskicks
7 posted on
12/26/2007 9:51:56 PM PST by
Duchess47
("One day I will leave this world and dream myself to Reality" Crazy Horse)
To: All
Just say "No" to the Ron Paul Cult
8 posted on
12/26/2007 9:53:27 PM PST by
april15Bendovr
(Free Republic & Ron Paul Cult = oxymoron)
To: traviskicks
"I paid for this!"9 posted on
12/26/2007 9:55:00 PM PST by
jdm
To: traviskicks
Hey Travis, how about this:
"If you analyze it, I believe the very heart and soul of conservatism is libertarianism. The basis of conservatism is a desire for less government interference or less centralized authority or more individual freedom - and this is a pretty general description also of what libertarianism is. I think that libertarianism and conservatism are traveling the same path."
— Ronald Reagan
At the least, it'll start a conversation; so far they're all just sayin' "No"...
10 posted on
12/26/2007 9:57:59 PM PST by
dayglored
(Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
To: traviskicks
Oh please. Not this again.
11 posted on
12/26/2007 10:00:40 PM PST by
rlmorel
(Liberals: If the Truth would help them, they would use it.)
To: traviskicks
Reagan would declare Ron Paul illegal and begin bombing in 5 minutes.
Reagan was far from non-interventionist. Ask the Sandanistas. Ask the former Soviets. Ask Ron Paul if he would have installed Pershing 2’s and ground-based cruise missiles in Europe to challenge the Soviets. No, that would have been none of our business. We would have made the Soviets mad at us. It would have been our fault.
Ron Paul will never be the commander in chief of my United States.
12 posted on
12/26/2007 10:08:30 PM PST by
doug from upland
(Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
To: traviskicks
If Reagan were alive today, he’d be screaming: “Let me outta here!”
14 posted on
12/26/2007 10:19:24 PM PST by
Rudder
To: traviskicks
“Would Reagan Vote for Ron Paul?”
He got the chance to in 1988 - anyone know how he voted?
15 posted on
12/26/2007 10:25:38 PM PST by
decal
(This tagline is subject to change without noti........)
To: traviskicks
17 posted on
12/26/2007 10:26:39 PM PST by
Duke Nukum
(He burns at the center of time and he sees the turn of the Universe.)
To: traviskicks
19 posted on
12/26/2007 10:58:36 PM PST by
Mark
(REMEMBER: Mean spirited, angry remarks against my postings won't feed even one hungry child.)
To: traviskicks
Nope, Reagan would not vote for Ron Paul.
20 posted on
12/26/2007 11:06:07 PM PST by
Brandie
(Vote for a Conservative! Islam is a Death Cult, is that simple enough to understand!)
To: traviskicks
It is my personal belief that if Reagan were alive and living in Iowa today, and he had to choose among the Republican presidential candidates, that he would likely choose the man the GOP establishment and national media have written off -- Congressman Ron Paul. Nonsense. Paul is basically running against the Republican Party, and Reagan would have had no part of that.
23 posted on
12/27/2007 4:26:00 AM PST by
kevkrom
(All those in favor of Thompson, don't raise your hand.)
To: traviskicks
28 posted on
12/27/2007 6:58:32 AM PST by
traviskicks
(http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
To: traviskicks
29 posted on
12/27/2007 6:59:03 AM PST by
Tarpon
(Ignorance, the most expensive commodity produced by mankind.)
To: traviskicks
It is my personal belief that if Reagan were alive and living in Iowa today, and he had to choose among the Republican presidential candidates, that he would likely choose the man the GOP establishment and national media have written off -- Congressman Ron Paul. The idea that Reagan would vote for a guy who enables the Troofer community is perhaps even more insulting than anything the Left has ever written about him. Towery should be ashamed.
30 posted on
12/27/2007 7:31:04 AM PST by
Mr. Silverback
(Support Scouting: Raising boys to be strong men and politically incorrect at the same time.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson