Skip to comments.
[Ron] Paul: A seller of ideas
Chicago Tribune ^
| 11/13/07
| Lisa Anderson
Posted on 11/13/2007 7:11:27 AM PST by traviskicks
They call him Dr. No -- no big government, no big spending, no flouting the Constitution. And no interest in slick political image.
U.S. Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) sticks to serious principles and says what he thinks. Someone is listening he raised millions in one day on the Internet.
No more Department of Education. No more Federal Reserve Bank. No more Medicare or Medicaid. No more membership in the United Nations or NATO. No more federal drug laws. And, no more U.S. troops in Iraq -- or anywhere else on foreign soil.
The Internal Revenue Service would be history in the first week that Ron Paul sits behind the desk in the Oval Office. And the dismantling of the above-mentioned entities and relationships -- plus a long list of others -- soon would commence.
Think that sounds eccentric, strange, even crazy? Many of the libertarian-minded, 10-term congressman's rivals for the GOP presidential nomination think so and have said so.
But, to a growing, Internet-based pool of supporters, the silver-haired obstetrician turned politician is the sanest man at the Republican debates and perhaps in all of Congress. Paul attracts an unusual political potpourri of people of all ages and viewpoints, including a sprinkling of conspiracy theorists and other extremists whose views Paul's campaign disavows. While most supporters ardently oppose the Iraq war, what they all share is a deep disenchantment and distrust of the federal government in its present form and a fervent belief in Paul's plans to change it.
(Excerpt) Read more at chicagotribune.com ...
TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: adminkeywordabuse; admintitleabuse; braindeadzombiecult; meaninglesstripe; nothing; paulestinians; paultards; ronpaul; sellerofbravosierra; spamspamspamspam; surrendermonkey
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 221-238 next last
To: traviskicks
Ron Paul is the only republican candidate who wants to surrender to al Qaeda. The same al Qaeda that attacked us on OUR soil killing 3000 of our innocent civilians. Now that is SOME idea that ONLY a COWARD could come up with.
21
posted on
11/13/2007 7:51:02 AM PST
by
jrooney
(The democrats are the friend of our enemy and the enemy of our friends. Attack them, not GW!)
To: Mr. Jeeves
The more I think about it the more it seems to me that bin Laden is the new Emmanual Goldstein.
22
posted on
11/13/2007 7:52:00 AM PST
by
ksen
("For an omniscient and omnipotent God, there are no Plan B's" - Frumanchu)
To: Mr. Jeeves
Your post is pure emotion based hysteria pretending to be “thought”
Both the London and Madrid bombing took place after that time. Obvious Al Qeda was not destroyed in Afghanistan in 2001. It is being destroyed as we speak in Iraq, the Philippines, the Sudan and Afghanistan but it is not dead yet.
Your god, Der Paul, would resurrect Al Qeda by running away instead of finishing the job. That fact alone renders him completely unfit to be President.
You Neo Isolationists simply must grow up. Your habit of mindlessly clinging to prove failure of dogmas rather then bother to learn even a single fact about Iraq is simply inexcusable
23
posted on
11/13/2007 7:52:23 AM PST
by
MNJohnnie
("Hillary is polarizing, deceitful, and liberal. And those are are her good points!" Beaversmom)
To: jrooney
You mean those guys from Saudi Arabia?
How’re we doing stopping the spread of Wahhabism emanating from Saudi Arabia?
Oh, we’re too busy in Iraq?
How many Iraqis were involved in 9-11 again? I forget.
24
posted on
11/13/2007 7:53:52 AM PST
by
ksen
("For an omniscient and omnipotent God, there are no Plan B's" - Frumanchu)
To: ksen
From the article ksen, from the article...
The Internal Revenue Service would be history in the first week that Ron Paul sits behind the desk in the Oval Office. And the dismantling of the above-mentioned entities and relationships -- plus a long list of others -- soon would commence.
As for the rest, well since you could not read the article why should you be able to read anyones else post, much less mine.
Have a good one...
25
posted on
11/13/2007 7:53:57 AM PST
by
ejonesie22
(Real voters in real voting booths will elect FDT.)
To: ejonesie22
Excellent, you are against getting rid of the IRS as soon as possible?
I understand why you don’t want to address the rest of my post.
26
posted on
11/13/2007 7:55:33 AM PST
by
ksen
("For an omniscient and omnipotent God, there are no Plan B's" - Frumanchu)
To: Abcdefg
Wrong. Paul is the only candidate who advocates abolishment of Govt. There is a huge difference between the two.
Another example of how Paul is simply unfit for the job. His complete inability to actually present a politically viable agenda. There is no what or how being presented by Paul’s campaign just a bunch of meaningless slogans and sound bites.
Paul is just screaming nice sounding rhetoric and emotional inflamed demagoguery which may make the Paulbots hearts beat faster, it does not qualify Paul for the job of President.
27
posted on
11/13/2007 7:56:50 AM PST
by
MNJohnnie
("Hillary is polarizing, deceitful, and liberal. And those are are her good points!" Beaversmom)
To: traviskicks
The Internal Revenue Service would be history in the first week that Ron Paul sits behind the desk in the Oval Office. Specifically how? All revenue and taxation bills must originate in Congress, not the Executive. Are you saying that Paul will be some sort of dictator? Something this major would go beyond Unified Executive Theory, something Paul preaches against. I see his 'promise' to eliminate all taxes and the IRS as simply a way of pandering for votes from the suckers who think he could do this.
28
posted on
11/13/2007 7:57:18 AM PST
by
mnehring
(I am free not to support Ron Paul... Wow, I feel special...)
To: Badeye
..so has Red State and Hannity Forums. About the only place that let’s Paul articles stay is here.
29
posted on
11/13/2007 7:59:02 AM PST
by
mnehring
(I am free not to support Ron Paul... Wow, I feel special...)
To: ksen
Yeah, it is just a coincidence Saddam asked for volunteers from his AIR FORCE for attacks against US interests around the world, SIX MONTHS before the attacks of 9/11. If Paul had his way Saddam would still be in power to rape and murder the innocent. We would then have Iran and Iraq racing to get nukes.
30
posted on
11/13/2007 7:59:29 AM PST
by
jrooney
(The democrats are the friend of our enemy and the enemy of our friends. Attack them, not GW!)
To: mnehrling; MNJohnnie; ejonesie22; Jim Robinson
American foreign policy, a la Ron Paul:
31
posted on
11/13/2007 8:00:26 AM PST
by
KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
("Ron Paul and his flaming antiwar spam monkeys can Kiss my Ass!!" -- Jim Robinson, 09/30/07)
To: mnehrling
Yep, and isn’t that ironic, given whats posted about FR in on those sites?
32
posted on
11/13/2007 8:00:26 AM PST
by
Badeye
(That Karma thing keeps coming around, eh Sally? (chuckle))
To: mnehrling
Why that would actually require them to read the Constitution...
33
posted on
11/13/2007 8:00:52 AM PST
by
darkwing104
(Let's get dangerous)
To: basil
Id say that just the number of folks he is talking about firing would be enough to keep him from ever winning the election. There must be millions of people who work for all these agencies and bureaucracies who probably aren't interested in voting themselves out of jobs.
A good reason to prevent those folks and anyone else on the government dole from voting.
This isn't in support of Ron Paul, per se, but the government shouldn't be elected by those seeking direct gains from it.
34
posted on
11/13/2007 8:00:57 AM PST
by
Filo
(Darwin was right!)
To: ksen
Oh brother...
Not only can you NOT read something in front of you, you CAN read things that are not even there...
You are amazing!!!
35
posted on
11/13/2007 8:01:11 AM PST
by
ejonesie22
(Real voters in real voting booths will elect FDT.)
To: mnehrling
..so has Red State and Hannity Forums.... not to mention Little Green Footballs.
36
posted on
11/13/2007 8:01:44 AM PST
by
KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
("Ron Paul and his flaming antiwar spam monkeys can Kiss my Ass!!" -- Jim Robinson, 09/30/07)
To: mnehrling
Like I have said, Jim has a really cool sense of humor...
37
posted on
11/13/2007 8:02:42 AM PST
by
ejonesie22
(Real voters in real voting booths will elect FDT.)
To: ksen
From your own FR profile - "May God bless our troops with victory and bring them all home safely"
Paul could care less if our troops have victory. He wants to bring them home with a defeat against al Qaeda. Since you support Paul, I guess that makes you a hypocrite! No different than a liberal.
38
posted on
11/13/2007 8:03:52 AM PST
by
jrooney
(The democrats are the friend of our enemy and the enemy of our friends. Attack them, not GW!)
To: traviskicks
Ron Paul is going to get this all done in his first week? Congress will say “yay!” lets all get on board the Ron Paul express. Break out the rubber stamps! Go! Go! Go! Sign faster! We’ve got to get this back to Ron Paul so it can be signed into law.
We’ve got to get all of this bureaucracy out on the streets and moved into productive employment in the private sector! Damn the unions! What do WE care what they think!
Bush tried to privatize a portion of Social Security. Republicans slapped him down.
We had to almost go to our representatives offices and kick their ass so they would not pass the POS immigration bill this year.
39
posted on
11/13/2007 8:04:48 AM PST
by
listenhillary
(You get more of what you focus on)
To: Abcdefg
40
posted on
11/13/2007 8:05:36 AM PST
by
wastedyears
(One Marine vs. 550 consultants. Sounds like good odds to me.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 221-238 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson