Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Why I Favor Our Superiors Legalizing Our Situation In The Church"
The Wanderer ^ | September 18, 2003 | Fr. Paul Aulagnier, SSPX

Posted on 09/11/2003 9:11:20 PM PDT by Theosis

Q. Since you are the first French priest ordained for the Priestly Society of St. Pius X, were you close to Archbishop Lefebvre? How did he inspire you?

A. Yes, I was close to Archbishop Lefebvre. I knew him well and I strongly appreciated him. He was so cordial, pleasant, a great prelate, but humble, simple, thoughtful for those who surrounded him. He had heart. It was difficult to not love him. He had a magnetic per-

Fr. Aulagnier meets with Cardinal Castrillon Hoyos and Bishop Rifan.

sonality. I knew him while during my seminary days at Santa Chiara, the French Seminary in Rome. We were in the midst of the Second Vatican Council in 1964. The seminarians followed, as much as they could, this ecclesiastical event.

The seminary professors often invited a particular conciliar father to spend the evening with us. They were of every tendency. It certainly brought some of us joy to hear Archbishop Lefebvre on the two or three occasions he was invited. Differing from the others, he spoke little about the council. Rather he spoke about the priesthood to which we desired Ordination. Like several of my fellow seminarians, I appreciated his presentation of the Catholic priesthood.

In the midst of the council, everything was changing. In a university seminary, minds react quickly, undergo influences, and seek to understand. We participated at the seminary in all the systematic changes of everything — of the common life, of the house rules, of theology, of scholastics. In the midst of this spiritual and intellectual agitation, we needed to be careful, to reflect, to inquire, and to read a lot in order to remain informed.

We painstakingly followed such journals as Nouvelles de Chrétienté, Itinéraires, and La Pensée Catholique to follow the conciliar debates. Without these journals, I do not know if I would be a priest today. Without Archbishop Lefebvre, I certainly would not be. The superiors of the French seminary would not have accepted me. My mind was not open to the proposed novelties.

Our little group of traditional seminarians quickly saw ourselves becoming the object of criticism. When many of us were refused tonsure in 1968, we turned to Archbishop Lefebvre. Having resigned as superior general of the Spiritans, Archbishop Lefebvre was now free to found a seminary in Fribourg, Switzerland. I remember when he approached Bishop Charriere of Fribourg about this project. The bishop accepted it and even encouraged him. The archbishop saw the finger of God.

I became part of the first class of nine seminarians. My diocesan bishop at the time authorized the transfer. Being the most experienced seminarian — I already had four years of seminary under my belt — gave me the opportunity to become close to Archbishop Lefebvre. During walks, he would gladly converse with us. He even confided in us spontaneously, spoke of his projects, of his priestly ideal, of his hesitations. He often shared his African memories, his memories of the council, his decision to publish his essay, "To Remain Catholic, Must We Become Protestant?"

This essay explains the whole of Archbishop Lefebvre. He hated the modern world’s revolutionary spirit that refused subjection, submission, subordination to a created order, to a divine order. Archbishop Lefebvre had been formed by the thinking of Popes Pius IX, Leo XIII, St. Pius X, and Pius XII. These were his masters. He remained faithful to them all his life. For Archbishop Lefebvre, God as Trinity is everything.

(Excerpt) Read more at thewandererpress.com ...


TOPICS: Activism; Apologetics; Catholic; Current Events; Ecumenism; General Discusssion; History; Ministry/Outreach; Prayer; Religion & Culture; Religion & Politics; Theology; Worship
KEYWORDS: campos; catholic; conservative; excommunication; lefebvre; mass; reconciliation; rome; schism; sspx; tradition; traditionalist; tridentine; wanderer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 last
To: sandyeggo
Hey, Sandy...my main man (synecdoche). Good to see you. I always have had a warm spot in my heart for you. You have always been kind and faithful. Good to "see ya" also
61 posted on 09/13/2003 8:32:52 AM PDT by Catholicguy (p.s. I hope this apology doesn't preclude me from using "Schismatic Orcs.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: sitetest
OK, you say "welcome back" and that sounds kind and welcoming and everything. However, I notice you haven't offered me any of that Cabernet produced during that drought year.
62 posted on 09/13/2003 8:36:03 AM PDT by Catholicguy (It is 11:35 a.m. in Florida. It is Saturday. Isn't it about time we uncorked a decent Cabernet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: St.Chuck
Sound the tocsin and unsheath the poison pens. In the words of Fast Eddie - "I am BACK."

Good to see ya

63 posted on 09/13/2003 8:38:44 AM PDT by Catholicguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

Comment #64 Removed by Moderator

To: Catholicguy; Polycarp
Dear Catholicguy,

"OK, you say 'welcome back' and that sounds kind and welcoming and everything. However, I notice you haven't offered me any of that Cabernet produced during that drought year."

ROTFLMAO!!!

Heck, I've spent all morning killing the damned calf!! What say you pop the cork on my wine (the Cab is next to the Merlot, right as you go down the stairs to the basement, right in front - be careful, don't mistake the vintages!), and you pour me and you a glass each while I figure out which part of the beast to cook first?!?


sitetest
65 posted on 09/13/2003 8:42:57 AM PDT by sitetest (Use the blue, hand-blown wine glasses. We use them on special occasions. Plus, they hold less wine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: sitetest
Dang, it is good to be back amongst Caths who love the Faith.

I am so happy I wanna fight.

66 posted on 09/13/2003 8:47:43 AM PDT by Catholicguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

Comment #67 Removed by Moderator

To: sinkspur
Why did you excerpt this?

It's also nice to give the Wanderer a plug and some web traffic. Maybe if their web traffic goes up enough, they'll start putting more content up.

Wouldn't that be nice? I can't think of how many of their articles I'd like to key in if I had the time.
68 posted on 09/13/2003 4:09:15 PM PDT by Antoninus (In hoc signo, vinces †)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ultima ratio
This quote of Williamson seems tongue-in-cheek. At most, it's an off-the-cuff remark--not a serious demand to be met by Rome. Where did you get this?

It's definitely tongue-in-cheek - Williamson would put it far more pompously if he ever expressed this sentiment in so many words.

Read his comments on the matter and it becomes clear that he believes that he has the right to dictate terms and that among his terms are not that his consecration be regularized but that it simply be accepted as fully canonical and unexceptionable.

But you didn't address my larger points.

69 posted on 09/15/2003 4:51:33 AM PDT by wideawake (God bless our brave soldiers and their Commander in Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson