Skip to comments.
QUESTION #34
The Answer Book ^
| 1989
| Dr. Samuel C Gipp Th.D
Posted on 01/28/2003 3:12:58 PM PST by Commander8
QUESTION: Didn't the King James Bible when first printed contain the Apocrypha?
ANSWER: Yes.
(Excerpt) Read more at chick.com ...
TOPICS: Evangelical Christian; General Discusssion; History
KEYWORDS: apocrypha; av1611
To: Commander8
My biggest complaint in the series of articles is the constant reference to the KJV being the "perfect" Bible. This is simply not true. And this reference is what I refer to as "arrogance" on the part of the author.
To: Commander8
You can still get the KJV with the apocrypha from Cambridge Bibles published in Great Britain. You can also get a reproduction of the origional 1611 edition with Apocrypha published by Nelson Publishers.
It is great fun to try to read the "Old English".
To: LiteKeeper
For those who think the KJV is the perfect bible, they need to read the preface "From the Translators to the Reader" still found in the larger editions of the Cambridge Blble and the reproduction of the 1611 edition.
The translators did not consider the KJV to be the absolute perfect end of bible translations recognizing their own human weakness.
To: LiteKeeper
Be patient, there are only 28 more "questions" left and we will be free of this silly series.
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson