Posted on 10/09/2023 8:35:21 AM PDT by ebb tide
What to make of a document like Pope Francis's latest apostolic exhortation, Laudate Deum? Like other Francis encyclicals, it is hardly recognizable as a Catholic document. The central portion of the letter addresses the "progress and failures" of various "climate conferences" held in the last decades. It features an entire section vaguely prognosticating on a upcoming conference in Dubai.
As this description suggests, Laudate Deum is single-mindedly materialistic and lacking in any supernatural focus. Its political arguments are naive, abstract, and self-contradictory. It endorses a global coalition of "activists" who will put "pressure" on national governments in service of a single world government. This secular world government will have "real authority" to punish those who defy it. In the spirit of "hagan lio," then, Laudate Deum seems to endorse splashy climate activism of the type that blocks public roads and defaces works of art. Ultimately, its political recommendations will be ignored, because they are not useful or insightful.
Without any hint of irony, Francis endorses the American politician Rahm Emanuel's shameless quip, "Never let a crisis go to waste." Says Francis, "It continues to be regrettable that global crises are being squandered when they could be the occasions to bring about beneficial changes. This is what happened in the 2007-2008 financial crisis and again in the Covid-19 crisis." It would be crass for a politician to talk this way, let alone a Pope. And the implication of these words is even more sinister: that the authoritarian tactics that emerged in the face of both crises might usefully be extended into the future, except this time in service of global climate goals.
Similarly, Laudate Deum dismisses "efforts at adaptation" and "new technical interventions" to mitigate climate issues as forms of "homicidal pragmatism," an overwrought, unfortunate and unhelpful turn of phrase in service of an unrealistic and unscientific pessimism.
Laudate Deum has a decidedly populist, anti-American pitch to it. It praises the poor and the Third World and denounces "the Western model." Indeed, in its rush to condemn Americans, it contains an embarrassing mathematical error. It claims that the "emissions per individual in the United States are about two times greater than those of individuals living in China." But the document it cites shows that the per capital emissions of Americans are only 43% higher than Chinese.
That brings us to a final point. Some have condemned Laudate Deum for repositioning the Church as an NGO. But the truth is even worse than that. A previous pope sincerely animated by climate issues would have identified a distinctively Catholic basis for concern. He then would have mobilized the Church's own institutions, bishops, priests, and laypeople in service of addressing climate change. But Laudate Deum is so single-mindedly secular, populist, and globalist that it cannot even begin to imagine the Church making a difference. We know that Christ created his Church to save souls. But Francis envisions U.N. agencies, climate conferences, and secular activists as the agents who will "avoid an increase of a tenth of a degree in the global temperature"-- not the Church. Individual people "of faith" may have "spiritual motivations" for participating in this multi-cultural, multi-national climate movement, but the Church herself is assigned no distinctive role in bringing about decreases in global emissions. Instead, change will come "from major political decisions on the national and international level," and it will be imposed by a world government with coercive authority.
Ultimately, Laudate Deum underscores the diminished state of the Church and the papacy under Francis-- reduced to watching, prognosticating and criticizing instead of blessing, healing or saving.
Ping
When I went to Joe Scheidler’s office, he had this posted on his wall:
“For God so loved the world, he did not send a committee.”
“Its political arguments are naive, abstract, and self-contradictory.”
Emphasis on naive. Leftists always are...they’re so in thrall to their own egos that they can’t believe anybody wouldn’t love them and know that they’re on the correct side (left).
Probably 90% of the people at that music festival in Israel were full supporters of the “Palestinians” (a title Hamas has appropriated) and could never have imagined that they could be fodder for the Revolution as well.
The problem is that Bergoglio - a nitwit Argentinian from a privileged background, like Che Guevara - is leading many astray and his ego and naivete are destroying the Church.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.