Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pope Francis clarifies comments on homosexuality: “One must consider the circumstances.”
Outreach ^ | January 27, 2023 | Outreach Staff

Posted on 01/28/2023 7:31:06 AM PST by ebb tide

Pope Francis clarifies comments on homosexuality: “One must consider the circumstances

This week, in an interview with the Associated Press, Pope Francis became the first pope to call for the decriminalization of homosexuality. It was an historic step towards the Catholic Church’s protection of vulnerable LGBTQ people around the world. (Read our coverage of the pope’s recent remarks here.)

During his interview, the Holy Father imagined a hypothetical conversation in which a person might object by saying, “Being homosexual is a sin,” and the pope suggested a response: “It’s also a sin to lack charity with one another.”

Some media outlets, however, ascribed these sentiments directly to the pope, even though church teaching does not state that the homosexual orientation itself is a sin. As the pope said in his interview, as he has on other occasions: “It is a human condition.”

To help clarify things, Outreach asked the Holy Father three questions, in Spanish, and received a written response from him. We framed these questions as an interview, in order that he knew that his responses would be made public. Our three questions were:

  1. Holy Father, thank you for your strong call to decriminalize homosexuality. Why did you decide to say this at this time?

  2. There seems to have been some confusion about your comment, “Being gay is a sin,” which, of course, is not part of church teaching. My feeling was that you were simply repeating what others might say hypothetically. So, do you think that simply being gay is a sin?

  3. What would you say to Catholic bishops who still support the criminalization of homosexuality?

The pope’s written response to Outreach editor James Martin, S.J., appears below, translated from the Spanish by J.D. Long-García and Ivan Briggeler.

Dear brother,

Thank you for your letter.

It is not the first time that I speak of homosexuality and of homosexual persons.

And I wanted to clarify that it is not a crime, in order to stress that criminalization is neither good nor just.

When I said it is a sin, I was simply referring to Catholic moral teaching, which says that every sexual act outside of marriage is a sin. Of course, one must also consider the circumstances, which may decrease or eliminate fault. As you can see, I was repeating something in general. I should have said “It is a sin, as is any sexual act outside of marriage.” This is to speak of “the matter” of sin, but we know well that Catholic morality not only takes into consideration the matter, but also evaluates freedom and intention; and this, for every kind of sin.

And I would tell whoever wants to criminalize homosexuality that they are wrong.

In a televised interview, where we spoke with natural and conversational language, it is understandable that there would not be such precise definitions.

I pray for you and for your work. Please do the same for me.

May Jesus bless you and may the Holy Virgin protect you.

Fraternally,

Francisco



TOPICS: Catholic; Moral Issues
KEYWORDS: antipope; apostatepope; frankenchurch; homos
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
... every sexual act outside of marriage is a sin. Of course, one must also consider the circumstances, which may decrease or eliminate fault.

There he goes again with that "dicernment" to commit sin.

1 posted on 01/28/2023 7:31:06 AM PST by ebb tide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

Not your yob, Poop.


2 posted on 01/28/2023 7:32:22 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (The worst thing about censorship is ████ █ ██████ ███████ ███ ██████ ██ ████████. FJB.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Al Hitan; Fedora; irishjuggler; Jaded; kalee; markomalley; miele man; Mrs. Don-o; ...

Barf Alert Ping


3 posted on 01/28/2023 7:32:40 AM PST by ebb tide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide
In a televised interview, where we spoke with natural and conversational language, it is understandable that there would not be such precise definitions.

You are not some guy sitting on a barstool, you are a shepherd.

If you are not prepared to speak of such matters with precise language, then perhaps it is better to not speak at all.

4 posted on 01/28/2023 7:38:31 AM PST by Jeff Chandler (THE ISSUE IS NEVER THE ISSUE. THE REVOLUTION IS THE ISSUE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

So they are adopting the ‘everything is relative’ doctrine now?


5 posted on 01/28/2023 7:50:14 AM PST by grame (May you know more of the love of God Almighty this day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

BUMP!


6 posted on 01/28/2023 7:50:59 AM PST by painter ( Isaiah: �Woe to those who call evil good and good evil,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

As the Apostle Paul said, we have two natures - one flesh, and one spirit. He described the daily battle he had with the flesh inclination, and said in Romans, 7:19 For the good that I would I do not: but the evil which I would not, that I do.
20 Now if I do that I would not, it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me.

Anyone that has watched their dogs see their animal behaviors, and thus see the things that that they do that are similar to themselves. So, is it a sin to do what an animal does? No, that is his nature. So Paul admonished us to seek after that spiritual nature that we all possess. To stay mired in your animal nature seems to be a sin to me, I I personally do not believe that God Created us to stay as animals. He did create us with two natures, so that we would have a choice, where animals do not. So, is it a sin? If you define a sin as rebelling against God’s wishes for us, then I suppose it is. But homosexuality is not elevated beyond gossip, envy, gluttony, etc., or any other act of rebellion against God. They are all evil in God’s eye in my humble opinion. Likewise, to encourage animal behavior is a sin I believe, and ultimately we will be judged on that.


7 posted on 01/28/2023 7:54:24 AM PST by silent majority rising
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: silent majority rising
But homosexuality is not elevated beyond gossip, envy, gluttony, etc., or any other act of rebellion against God.

Not true. Not all sins are the same. Some are worse than others and result in a greater judgement. Thinking a lustful thought is not the same as committing adultery. Having a murderous thought is not the same as genocide. Sodomy is the result of being “given over” by God to demonic spirits because of continued transgressing rebellion.

Romans 1: 26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: 27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.
8 posted on 01/28/2023 8:08:39 AM PST by Jan_Sobieski (Sanctification)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

I really hope people wake up and realize that the satanic rc church has nothing to do with being a believer. One world religion coming.


9 posted on 01/28/2023 8:15:22 AM PST by Bulwyf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide
Saints, what we are witnessing today in Christian Churches of all denominations is “The Great Bundling” of Matthew 13. Countries, Churches, and every one of us must decide how we’re bundled. Will we go along with Sodomy like Lot’s wife, sons, and sons in Law? Or will we stand against Sodomy to the last? Those who go along are bundled for judgment. Those who stand with Jesus are bundling for Escape (like Lot)…

Matthew 13:30 Let both grow together until the harvest: and in the time of harvest I will say to the reapers, Gather ye together first the tares, and bind them in bundles to burn them: but gather the wheat into my barn.
10 posted on 01/28/2023 8:22:49 AM PST by Jan_Sobieski (Sanctification)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

OK, Popey, what about rampant homosexuality within the Vatican?

Breaking your oath with your god? Is that not a crime?

You gonna split such hairs when facing the first Pope?

I don’t really give a flip so long as consulting ADULTS are involved and no oath breakers are involved. But, YOU should.


11 posted on 01/28/2023 8:28:55 AM PST by bobbo666 (Baizuo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

The Pope has sold out.


12 posted on 01/28/2023 8:33:13 AM PST by Spok (They lie, we know they lie, and they know that we know they are lying. And still they lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grame

RCINC looking to increase revenues (those 700$/hr defense attorneys fees add up)

RCINC is the oldest most profitable multinational corporation on the planet. Also the most hypocritical- preach open borders while Vatican is surrounded by 40’ high walls.


13 posted on 01/28/2023 8:44:00 AM PST by slapshot ( - Get woke go broke-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

Okay Frankie, here’s the deal. Does the Bible say that it is wrong? If so, then it is WRONG. End of discussion. Do not argue with the inerrant Word of Almighty God.


14 posted on 01/28/2023 8:52:09 AM PST by hoagy62 (Evil won...again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

I don’t think Jesus had to clarify any of the statements he made with, “well their could be special circumstances” or “you took what I said out of context”. Did He?


15 posted on 01/28/2023 9:07:14 AM PST by Delta 21 (MAGA Republican is my pronoun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

the pope and some of his ilk seem hell-bent on normalizing homosexuality - even glorifying it and coddling it- despite what God’s word has to say about it- They are creating a god in their own image- because they certainly aren’t servign the God of the bible


16 posted on 01/28/2023 9:21:41 AM PST by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

ANTI pope. Not the pope. Never has been, never will be.


17 posted on 01/28/2023 11:18:57 AM PST by GrumpyOldGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

Thanks. The title is all one needs to know. Out to lunch before he gets started. Though I do want to know if he begins to look at “circumstances” regarding adultery and murder.

Just as a philosophical matter of course.


18 posted on 01/28/2023 11:42:48 AM PST by SaxxonWoods (The only way to secure your own future is to create it yourself. 111 is the key.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

Francis the talking mule puts his hoof in his mouth again.


19 posted on 01/28/2023 12:13:21 PM PST by Trump_Triumphant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

I think that statement applies to getting rid of the pope as well.


20 posted on 01/28/2023 1:23:23 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson