Posted on 02/18/2022 6:21:31 AM PST by ebb tide
Editor’s Note: This news is explosive. Published 11 days ago on Youtube in Italian/English subtitles, but unseen but by all than 350. This video was produced and published in German, in the very month the truth of Pope Benedict XVI’s resignation being invalid, was trumpeted by Msgr. Bux.
Now three years later, all the dirty laundry hidden for 9 years in Buenos Aires is out for show. And Bergoglio is caught twice, lying about.
HERE FOLLOWS AN AUTHORIZED ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF ANDREA CIONCI’S ARTICLE ABOUT THIS GERMAN DOCUMENTARY.
In 2018, the German state televistion channel ZDF broadcast a troubling documentary by Martin Boudot, entitled, “The Code of Silence”, which was never translated in any other language. Now, the YouTube Channel, Domina TV Multilingual has provided an Italian and English subtitled version which we have presented (here above). (This German version was itself a retransmission of the original 2016 French Documentary entitled, “CASH Investigation”, which got over 2 million views.)
The video affirms that Bergoglio, while Archbishop of Buenos Aires, not only totally ignored and refused to receive 7 persons abused by priests, but even promoted — by attempting to influence the judgement of the Argentine Court of Appeals — a powerful defense of the pedophile, priest, Fr. Julio Caesar Grassi (Biography, here in Spanish), who was condemend to 15 years in prison for abusing minors (boys and girls) who were 9-17 years of age. Grassi remains imprisoned in Argentina til this day.
Up until today, not withstanding the documentary and being petitioned, Bergoglio has never officially responded to the charges. Why does the Vatican Press Office not take charge of this matter, instead of arranging “visits and surprises”, as we demonstrated the other day regarding his visit to a CD shop.
The weighty documentary begins with an interview with Fr. Zollner, a counsellor of Bergoglio in matters of child abuse, and shows how “papa Francesco” did not take sufficiently severe steps with those Cardinals who are “attracted” to the phenomenon of abuse, “perhaps because,” as the narrator of the documentary says , “he himself has been accused in his own land, Argentina, many years before his election.”
As proof, the documentary then cites a passage from the book length interview, entitled, “Il Cielo e la Terra” (*Heaven and Earth”), co-written by Bergoglio and Rabbi Abraham Skorka. I checked the Italian version to confirm the citation, on p. 38, where Bergoglio confronts the question of pedophilia and assures us:
“That the celibate consequently become a pedophile is excluded. More than 70% of the cases of pedophilia occure in the context of the family or relatives: grandfathers, uncles, close male relatives, neighbors. The problem is not bound to celibacy. If a priest is a pedophile, he is such before becoming a priest. And yet, when this happens, one need not make believe that it’s not happening. One cannot remain in a position of power and destroy the life of another person. This has never happened in my diocese, but on one occasion a Bishop telephoned me to ask me what he ought to do in a situation of this kind, and I told him to take away the faculties of the one accused in this matter, to not permit him to exercise the priesthood, and to start a canonical process in the tribunal which oversaw his own diocese.”
Are we sure of that? The documentary maker, Boudat, thus made his way to Buenos Aires, where he met with 7 victims abused by priests of the Archdiocese: 5 women and two men. Having been questioned about the statement made by Bergoglio in the cited book, they responded: “He wants the people to believe him. But it is a lie!” The journalist interviewing them asks, “Who of you attempted to contact Bergoglio when he was the Archbishop?” “All of us”, they respond. And, “Which of you have received a response” “None of us. He receives all the celebrities, like Leonardo di Caprio, he opens doors and yet for us not even a short note to tell us that he was sorry to hear of it”. “I do not expect anything from him”, said one woman, “I do not believe in him. I have suffered much and I am very disappointed”. A young woman of 35 years confesses, in tears: “Everyone told me: ‘Write him! He is obliged to answer’, but nothing, I have suffered and now I am very disappointed.”
But the documentary does not end there. “As Archbishop of Buenos Aires, pope Francis was apparently deaf to the anguish of these victims, but what was worse, he deliberately attempted, in an other case regarding other victims, to divert justice, as some believe. The case is that of Fr. Julio Caesar Grassi, the biggest pedophile scandal in Argentina”.
This Grassi, a media personality who was always in the spot light, ran a huge orphanage until some of the children there denounced him for sexual abuse. Grassi was condemned to prison for 15 years and is still behind bars.
The Episcopal Conference of Argentina mobilized a defense of this priest-abuser and, as the defense attorney for the children, Attorney Gallego explains, this Conference commissioned in 2010 the famous attorney Sancinelli, from Buenos Aires,to undertake an huge counter-intestigation, filling 4 volumes, and totally to 2800 pages, with the purpose of defending Grassi. In the four tomes of that work, entitled, “A study on the case of Fr. Grassi”, the children were accused of lying, deceit, falsifications, and of having a dubious sexual orientation and that hence the priest should be absolved of the charges on appeal.
One paragraph speaks clearly: the work was commissioned in 2010, “on the initiative of the Argentine Episocopal Conference, in particular, by its then president Jorge Mario Cardinal Bergoglio, today, His Holiness, Pope Francis”,
“Hence, the pope”, as the documentary continues to say, “commissioned a counter-investigation to absolve a priest who has already been condemned for pedophilia and Bergoglio, the future pope, sent it with the most astute timing, to the Court of Appeals before the case of Fr. Grassi was heard on appeal.”
This matter was confirmed by the ex-magistrate of the Court of Appeals, Carlos Mariquez, today a judge serving on the Supreme Court of Argentina, who admits: “Yes, I did receive this counter-investigation. It is a sort of police-fiction story, in some areas biased and in others extremely biased, clearly in favor of Fr. Grassi. They were trying to exercise a subtle form of pressure on us judges“.
One of the young men, who was abused, then recounts how he suffered threats, thefts and home invasions, so much so that he had to be put in a witness protection program. The young man affirms, “I will never forget that which Fr. Grassi said throughout the case: ‘Bergoglio has never stopped holding my hand.’ Now Bergoglio is pope Francis, and he has never spoken contrary to the words of Grassi, so I am sure that he has never stopped holding the hand of Grassi”.
For eight months the documentary-makers attempted to have an audience with Bergoglio, without success, and so they attempted directly in the Piazza of St. Peter’s, during a public audience. They asked him, “Your Holiness, did you attempt to influence justice in Argentina in the case of Grassi? Why did you commission a counter investigation?”
“I did nothing of the kind”, responds Bergoglio, denying everything and turning back away from them.
In sum, this documentary, which was broadcast on public television in Germany, is truly news worthy.
The sole error (which perhaps is a consolation to the faithful) which is contained in this video, but which those journalists could not have known at the time, is this: Bergoglio is NOT the pope, but a bishop-usurper, because His Holiness, Pope Benedict XVI has been exiled in an impeded see (canon 412), remaining the sole Roman Pontiff, and can be verified from the 60 chapters in our investigation, here.
FOR ENGLISH LANGUAGE SOURCES ON BERGOGLIO’S USURPATION,
SEE THE INDEX ON REPORTS ABOUT TEAM BERGOGLIO
AND THOSE ON THE RENUNCIATION OF POPE BENEDICT
Ping
Thanks for posting! :)
Can you impeach a pope?
The Sephardic Jews in Israel had a looney chief rabbi they had to force out and it was quite difficult.
Various theorists have said that a Pope could be deposed for manifest heresy. Trouble is, since it’s never been done, and he’s the chief legislator, we don’t exactly know how. An ecumenical council anathematized Pope Honorius for winking at monothelitism, but that was 50 years after his death and with the signature of the then-Pope (Agatho, I think?). How do you do that if the heretic is still alive?
And there’s another angle. Some are of the opinion (the article mentions it) that Benedict didn’t resign validly....the resignation requires some specific Latin terminology that was not used.
If Benedict didn’t resign, Francis never became Pope. That’s a whole nother roller coaster ride, but that has happened before.
Pedophile Priests?
That’s what’s called a “standing headline.” Old newspaper typesetter would use it so often, they simply racked and kept it in the drawer so they didn’t have to re-set it every time. Kind of like, “Drunk Kennedy.”
I wonder why the church policy is not, “Call the police” when they get a report?
Isn’t there something about a requirement for Christian leaders to be “beyond reproach”? I mean, like in the Bible. I am certain that is a specification.
Beyond reproach also carries a senses of unquestionable integrity.
So why would such a standard be ignored? I guess this is just more proof of the hypocrisy in (and that is) Roman Catholicism.
I’m really not sure about the Catholic Church anymore. Seems like there may be some structural problems.
Church policy used to come down on abusive priests like a ton of bricks. Antoninus can tell you about the Justinianic period.
But then we got all modern, right about the time when as Bella Dodd testified, Communists had pushed a bunch of homos into the seminaries. And of course once degenerates got in, they protected their own.
Currently yes, policy is to contact the police.
It was ignored because there was an active effort to fill the seminaries with degenerates to bring down the Church from the inside. We had the biggest target on our back so we were the ones infiltrated--by Marxists, Masons, etc. And by looking around I see every other denomination got hit with the same attack.
And fine to call out hypocrisy in the way Catholics live. But that's just what original sin does...it makes us hypocrites. If you can point to me a denomination or even a single person free of it I'd sure like to see that.
St. Philip Neri was a priest and a great saint, who really DID live beyond reproach, but he used to wake up in the morning and pray first thing: "Beware, o Lord, lest today Philip betray you."
Not in my diocese. They recently published their new policies. The word law enforcement or police is not in them.
A priest murdered my 12 year old neighbor 50 years ago this April.
The pedo finally made a chemo hazed death bed confession a day before he died. Last year. The whole city knew the guy did it. The DA and Bishop covered it up.
My sister in law was the HR director for the same diocese. She said the twisted logic that the church was using to cover up and protect these men was just crazy. Two bishops in our area were directly tied to this stuff—over decades.
No…it might be the policy where you are—and that is great. But it’s not here. When these men are getting murdered in prison, I will feel that justice for Danny is just starting.
Did anyone expect anything less from such a lowlife scumbag Marxist thug?
And here is how far it goes back. Much further than most think.
https://www.bishop-accountability.org/ma_springfield/#priests
I think the case can also be made that Benedict resigned under duress. (Deutsche Bank was literally shutting off the ATMs in Vatican City. There are many other examples.) That would make his resignation invalid because it was not freely given.
Formally, no. But what should happen informally is that the College of Cardinals should collectively tell him "it's time for you to go". That probably won't happen because of corruption and cowardice (and maybe some ignorance, too).
True. I definitely think duress was part of it....heck, he said so himself asking us to pray that he not flee before the wolves.
Frankly, I can’t see how a theologian and wordsmith of his intellectual precision confounds “ministry” and “office”. I strongly suspect his language in the resignation was deliberately calculated not to actually effect what it purported to effect.
Once you start looking, I think you’ll find that just about every group and people that stands for good in the world has been targeted and corrupted starting decades or more ago. Don’t throw everyone under the bus any more than saying one bad shooting proves all firearm owners are evil. That’s what the global cabal wants.
It’s almost like theres a “great awakening” going on to recognize this…
Just have the Swiss Guard go in, drag him out and throw him in the Tiber.
That’s how they did it in the old days.
:0Marxists gonna marxist. Covering up horrible crimes to secure and protect power is what they do.
Holy Spirit, please cleanse Your Church.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.