Posted on 04/15/2021 11:05:40 AM PDT by ebb tide
For instance, the Vatican appointed Archbishop Roche to head the Congregation for Divine Worship, in replacement of longtime TLM-friendly Cardinal Robert Sarah. Roche is lately on record saying that the implementation of the Novus Ordo should be regarded as an “ecclesiastical duty,” inasmuch as it reflects “ecclesiological differences” from the Traditional Latin Mass, reflecting the “magnitude of the changes that have taken place” viz. “the theological content of the Second Vatican Council itself, which was ecclesiologically significant and cognisant of a world that had changed.”
Wait a tick… the Popes have assured us that Vatican II was merely a pastoral council (odd as that might seem), and that it made no definitive acts or binding formulations. How, then, could this Council propose a “theological content” that involved “ecclesiological differences” so significant as to render it a “duty” to create a new rite of Mass?
Ping
Sadly there are those who would have Catholics attending a “mass” that resembles a mega church multi media rally.
Anti Pope is in charge. I do not recognize him.
Koine Greek, not Latin was the primary language of the New Testament texts, letters and books, from the time of Paul to 600 A.D.
There is no record of Paul or his contemporaries performing any ceremony in Latin.
How then can Latin lay claim to the oldest ceremonial language of Christians, much less Christianity? It can’t.
Saint Peter himself visited Rome, and founded a Church on the very spot where his Basilica now stands. And when he preached the Gospel of our Risen Lord, he surely did so in Latin. You don’t get much older than that.
So Roman Catholic Church tradition says.
>And when he preached the Gospel of our Risen Lord, he surely did so in Latin.
Speculation. He could have done so in Koine Greek. Probably quite a few people in Rome knew it.
Speculation.
When men make the rules the rules can be changed by other men.
For the Catholics and their “church” to claim sole authority to speak for God is beyond preposterous. They are a law to themselves and deceive many.
Have you found any stupid American to help you claim your lost fortune?
I admitted “could” and “probably”.
Exactly. And that’s what’s called “speculation”.
Wow!
What will happen to Latin-Americans?
They’ll have to attend English-speaking churches to get the latest traditions?
No they won’t. There are Latin-Spanish Mass missals available.
No need for English.
Dude...
I'm thinking "pro multis" v. "pro multibus".
A deliberate mistranslation by the modernists. It wasn't even a translation; it was a lie.
Several years ago, while we were vacationing in Virginia, I was overjoyed to find a Latin Mass. It brought tears to my eyes. So beautiful, so dignified. I was saddened, though, to realize how much Latin I had forgotten.
Is THAT how your "holy fathers" in their "holy offices" teach you to treat your neighbor?
No?
Then do you have to ask them to "bless" you, declare that you sinned, report how long it has been since your LAST confession, and then let them know the details of how you've wandered away from the teachings and traditions of the "Holy Roman Catholic Church" so you can receive absolution after a "good act of contrition"?
Wait a couple weeks and repeat?
I'm just curious.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.