Posted on 09/13/2020 1:04:41 PM PDT by NRx
The 1962 edition of the Anglican Book of Common Prayer is very interesting. Along with the usual services of Morning and Evening Prayer and Holy Communion is a complete version of the Psalter. It is arranged for daily recitation at both Morning and Evening Prayer services so that the entire Psalter is recited liturgically every month. Well, more or less. For in the Prayerbook Psalter, right after Psalm 57 comes Psalm 59, prompting the obvious question, “Whatever happened to Psalm 58?” One is tempted to say that it vanished to keep the latter half of Psalm 137 company, for that also is missing.
It is not hard to imagine what prompted the decision to omit Psalm 58 and the latter half of Psalm 137 from the Psalter. They are famously violent. Psalm 58 constitutes an extended imprecation upon the wicked, and asks God to “break the teeth in their mouths; tear out the fangs of the young lions, O Lord! Let them be like the snail which dissolves into slime, like the untimely birth that never sees the sun…The righteous will rejoice when he sees the vengeance; he will bathe his feet in the blood of the wicked. Men will say, ‘Surely there is a reward for the righteous; surely there is a God who judges on earth!” The latter half of Psalm 137 reads, “Remember, O Lord, against the Edomites the day of Jerusalem, how they said, ‘Rase it, rase it! Down to its foundations!’ O daughter of Babylon, you devastator! Happy shall he be who requites you with what you have done to us! Happy shall he be who takes your little ones and dashes them against the rock!” It appears that the editors of the 1962 Prayerbook thought that these psalms were too violent to be suitable for congregational recitation, and so they simply excised them from the Prayerbook Psalter.
One understands the decision somewhat, for not everything in Holy Scripture is necessarily equally fit for all audiences. Certain passages in the Song of Solomon, for example, are more suitable for adults than for children (and yes, this is an invitation to look through the Song of Solomon to find the passages for yourself—or to buy a commentary on it). And reading aloud in church David’s speech threatening harm to Nabal and his house in 1 Samuel 25 is all but certain to provoke adolescent giggles when David says, “God do so to David and more also if by morning I leave any who piss against the wall of all who belong to him” (v. 22, usually bowdlerized as “leave so much as one male”). I understand the pastoral concern. But excising these bits of the Psalter runs the risk of giving the impression that these psalms are not just indelicate, but morally deficient.
Certainly C. S. Lewis thought so. In his otherwise wonderful Reflections on the Psalms, he interprets the many imprecations in the Psalter as unfortunate moral lapses on the part of the psalmist. In his chapter on “The Cursings” he describes the imprecations as expressions of “bitter personal vindictiveness”, as “hideously distorted”, and even as “devilish”. And Lewis here has many companions, men who quite happily excise from the Scriptures whatever they find uncongenial, attributing the parts they like to divine inspiration and the parts they object to as the regrettable result of God having to use a fallible human instrument.
But this will hardly do. If all Scripture is indeed “God-breathed” (2 Timothy 3:16) so that the one who relaxes one of the least of its commandments and teaches men so will be called least in the Kingdom of heaven (Matthew 5:19), then we cannot take the easy way out and divide the Scriptures into two categories, the Authoritative and the Embarrassing. Our Lord and His apostles teach us that we are stuck with the whole thing.
What then are we to make of the imprecations in the Psalter? Two things.
First of all we must recognize that the imprecations are not motivated simply by personal anguish and frustration. The psalmist is not vexed only by the injustice and oppression he is experiencing, but by the fact that the wicked oppress all the humble and vulnerable of the earth. He is not praying so much for personal vindication as for vindication for all the helpless poor, for all the victims of rapacity and rape, for all fatherless orphans whom the wicked swallow up with apparent impunity (e.g. Psalm 9:18, 10:18). He is, in fact, praying for the coming Kingdom of God, the day when Yahweh will judge all the world with righteousness and vindicate those who have hoped in Him (Psalm 98:8-9).
This prayer that God will one day come and judge the world, consuming sinners from the earth (Psalm 104:35) is not an unworthy or unchristian prayer. St. Paul calls this coming “our blessed hope” (Titus 2:13), and affirms that in that day Christ will come with His mighty angels in flaming fire, inflicting vengeance upon those who do not know God and who disobey the Gospel of our Lord Jesus (2 Thessalonians 1:7-8). The prayers of the psalmist and the sighing of the helpless poor who are crushed under the boot of the grinning wicked will not forever go unanswered. The imprecations in the Psalter are not the devilish expressions of bitter men, but the hope of all who have gone down before their oppressors still trusting in God.
Secondly, we read the psalms with a keener eye, digging into those ancient texts to find deeper meanings. In short, we also read them typologically and allegorically. For example, when the psalmist declared that God dwelt in Zion, he originally referred to God’s earthly Temple in the city of Jerusalem, which was in the time of David only about eleven acres in total size. But a deeper reading will recognize in the earthly real estate an image of the celestial abode of God, the heavenly Zion (Galatians 5: 26, Hebrews 12:22). In the same way, Israel’s national and earthly enemies (e.g. the Edomites) are images our spiritual enemies, the demons (and perhaps, by extension, of those controlled by the demonic). The psalmist’s prayers for victory over his enemies and his inculcation of “perfect hatred” against them (e.g. Psalm 139:22) find fulfillment in our own implacable hatred of sin and our ceaseless warfare against Satan. The psalter, like all the Old Testament, can be read on two levels: the original historical meaning and a deeper mystical meaning. And both readings contain treasures for our souls.
We are invited by our Tradition, therefore, to transpose the Psalter into this more profound key, and when we do, we find that the imprecations against our enemies form an important part of our spiritual life and our inner warfare against the enemies that constantly besiege us. Maybe the editors of the 1962 Prayerbook should have left Psalm 58 where it was after all.
The Bible explicitly states to neither add to nor subtract from Scripture.
The answer to the reality of these and other so-called “hard sayings” of Scripture is not to pretend they don’t exist, but to take the time to study, understand them, and teach them in the larger context of Scripture itself and the culture at the time. Of course this would preclude an unmotivated, unlearned, or lazy preacher and an equally lazy or immature congregation, but that may be too much to ask for.
““For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.”
As a footnote to why Paul uses this idea of "wrestling" with supernatural beings.... Paul undoubtedly wrote this about “wrestling with principalities” because that is precisely what happened with Jacob when he wrestled with a principality (an angel) for his promised land.
And Paul knew we would understand that Jacob, by admitting what his name really meant “Cheater” to the angel, Jacob was repenting of his sin... and this is precisely when the Angel gave him a new name and allowed him passage...
... i.e. like Jacob/Israel we cannot enter into our promise for our own lives unless and until we repent.
Repentance is the key to how we win when we wrestle against Principalities.
Repentance is the key to how we enter into our own promise.
We are never to pick up the sword against flesh and blood “enemies” but to pray for them, mindful that “there but for the grace of God go I.”
Just because the psalter wanted God to rain destruction down on His enemies, doesn't mean God wanted to.
Which is true, but it was not excluded from the Bible, it was omitted from the Book of Common Prayer.
Which is true, but it was not excluded from the Bible, it was omitted from the Book of Common Prayer.
Answer: First of all, let’s define imprecatory prayer. To imprecate means “to invoke evil upon or curse” one’s enemies. King David, the psalmist most associated with imprecatory verses such as Psalm 55:15, 69:28, and 109:8, often used phrases like, “may their path be dark and slippery, with the angel of the LORD pursuing them” (Psalm 35:6) and “O God, break the teeth in their mouths; tear out the fangs of the young lions, O LORD!” (Psalm 58:6).
Psalms 7, 35, 55, 58, 59, 69, 109, and 139 were written by David to ask God to bring judgment upon his enemies. (The other two imprecatory psalms, 79 and 137, were written by Asaph and an unknown psalmist.) These prayers were written not so much to exact revenge upon one’s enemies, but rather to emphasize God’s abhorrence of evil, His sovereignty over all mankind, and His divine protection of His chosen people. Many of these prayers were prophetic and could be seen taking place later in the New Testament in actual historical events.
When David prayed for God to shatter the teeth of his enemies, likening them to young lions pursuing him to his death, he was making the point that God is holy, righteous, and just, and He will ultimately judge the wicked for the evil they do. Jesus quoted some of the imprecatory psalms during His earthly ministry. In John 15:25, Jesus quotes Psalm 35:19 and 69:4. Paul also quoted an imprecatory prayer in Romans 11:9–10, which is a quote of Psalm 69:22–23. Since Jesus and Paul quoted verses from these imprecatory psalms, it proves those psalms were inspired by God and counters any allegation that they were sinful or selfish prayers of revenge.
Using imprecatory prayers from the Psalms today should only be done against our spiritual enemies (Ephesians 6:12). Praying imprecations on human foes is unjustifiable, as it would require taking these prayers out of context. In the New Testament, Jesus exhorts us to pray for our enemies (Matthew 5:44–48; Luke 6:27–38), but praying for their death or for bad things to happen to them isn’t what He meant. Instead, we are to pray for their salvation first and foremost, and then for God’s will to be done. There’s no greater blessing than a personal relationship with Jesus Christ, and that’s what Jesus means by praying for and blessing those who curse us.
Praying in that manner allows God to work in our own lives to soften our hearts toward our enemies so that we’ll have compassion on them for their eternal destiny, and to remove bitterness and anger from our hearts. Praying for God’s will to be done means we agree with God and are submitting ourselves to His divine sovereignty, despite not always understanding perfectly what He’s doing in a particular situation. And it means we have given up the idea that we know best and instead are now relying on and trusting in God to work His will. If a personal wrong has truly been done to us, we seek God in prayer about it, and then leave room for God’s judgment and trust Him to do what is best. That is the way to be at peace with God and all men (Romans 12:17-21). https://www.gotquestions.org/imprecatory-prayer.html
They didn't.
The Book of Common Prayer is not the Bible nor does it purport to be.
Using your definition you are against any part of the Bible being printed without the full text. So, no devotionals, no daily verse, no rosaries, no chant. If you do not quote everything from Genesis to Revelation no scripture.
My only question about it all is how Paul does curse people in Galatians. But I think this curse has to do with the importance of theology and proper handling of the Word of God...
(which is why I am so upset about John MacArthur's statements that “one can repent after they take the Mark of the Beast” as well as the crazy ideas of the Apostolic Prophetic movement...)
Though Paul's curse in Galatians most often is used about Mormons in the last few decades:
Berean Study Bible
But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach a gospel contrary to the one we preached to you, let him be under a curse!
Berean Literal Bible
But even if we or an angel out of heaven should preach a gospel to you contrary to what we proclaimed to you, let him be accursed!
New American Standard Bible
But even if we, or an angel from heaven, should preach to you a gospel contrary to what we have preached to you, he is to be accursed!
New King James Version
But even if we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel to you than what we have preached to you, let him be accursed.
King James Bible
But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.
Christian Standard Bible
But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach to you a gospel contrary to what we have preached to you, a curse be on him
My mistake. I thought they were printing a Bible and omitting it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.