Posted on 02/04/2020 12:05:12 PM PST by ebb tide
ROME, February 4, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) — In line with Pope Francis’ controversial criticism of the sixth petition of the Lord’s Prayer, the Italian Bishops’ Conference has announced it will introduce a revised translation in the coming months.
The Missal containing the new version of the Our Father will be published in Eastertide and introduced into the liturgy at the beginning of Advent, Archbishop Bruno Forte told Italian media during an international theological forum held at Lateran University in Rome on January 27.
At present all vernacular translations (with the exception of the French, which has already been changed) of the “Our Father” correspond to the Latin of the Vulgate, which reads: non ne inducas in tentationem … lead us not into temptation, and is rendered in Italian, non ci indurre in tentazione.
Pope Francis, in an interview on Italian television in 2017, described this translation universally adopted from immemorial antiquity as “not good.”
With the Pope’s support (and some would argue pressure) the Italian Bishops’ Conference has therefore decided to change the text to, non abbandonarci alla tentazione, i.e. do not abandon us to temptation.
Scholars of ancient Greek and leaders of Protestant denominations have greeted the proposed changes with amused skepticism, overwhelmingly insisting that the traditional versions are authentic, idiomatic, and literal renderings of the Greek. The Chair of Classics at the University of Cambridge, one of the most prestigious academic positions in England, famously said: “‘Not a good translation’ indeed! Doesn’t say what I want it to, more like.”
The Evangelical church in Germany has also defended the traditional translation as “linguistically correct and good German as well,” adding that they intend to “stick with it.”
In his 2017 television interview, Pope Francis said that the reason he doesn’t like the traditional translation is because “it’s not [God] who throws me into temptation, in order to then see how I’ve fallen. No, a father doesn’t do this … The one who leads us into temptation is Satan. That’s Satan’s task,” he said.
But Swiss linguist and biblical scholar, Fr. Reto Nay, told LifeSite in a 2018 interview that he doesn’t consider there to be any difficulty reconciling the concept of God “leading us into temptation” with the rest of Scripture.
Contrary to La Repubblica’s recent characterization of the revision as “more correct,” the Swiss polyglot said he as “no idea” where the “and do not abandon us to temptation” comes from linguistically or spiritually.
In fact, he said, “it seems to insinuate that God actually could ‘abandon’ us in temptation which comes close to blasphemy because it puts the blame on God when we abandon him.”
How ought one properly to understand “and lead us not into temptation”?
Fr. Nay explained:
The seeming difficulty of the sentence is the understanding of “temptation” as if the Father would lead us into a temptation which He himself has created for us. However, the text does not say that God is the originator of the temptation; the devil is or men. Look at Acts 20:19 where Saint Paul speaks about “the temptations that came to me through the plots of the Jews.” In this sense, Christ is led into the wilderness by the Holy Spirit “to be tempted by the devil” (Mt 4:1). Such temptations are not surprising as “all who want to live a godly life in Christ Jesus will be persecuted” (2 Tim 3:12). Persecution is a kind of temptation. Therefore, the Our Father asks God that the temptations of the End times may be mitigated and this way we may be “delivered from evil” in the final apocalyptic battle that awaits all saints. Remember that Mt 24:22 says that “if those days had not been cut short, no one would be saved; but for the sake of the elect those days will be cut short.” This shortcut is a way through which the Father will lead us past the temptations of the end.
Asked how this petition relates to temptations in our daily lives, the biblical scholar said:
The End times are the time of the Church. For those who live in the Church and according to the Church, the End times are their “daily lives.” The saint experiences in his life all the dramatic signs of the End times, the wicked doesn’t because he lives far away from Christ. Again: “All who want to live a godly life in Christ Jesus will be persecuted” (2 Tim 3:12). These persecutions/temptations are part and a sign of the End times.
With the Pope’s support (and some would argue pressure) the Italian Bishops’ Conference has therefore decided to change the text to, non abbandonarci alla tentazione, i.e. do not abandon us to temptation.
Why would that start with the Latin Vulgate to determine the correct translation for a document written in Greek. Especially when they have one of the earliest Greek manuscripts which is arguably older than the Vulgate?
Excellent. About time. Everyone knows that it’s the wording for these prayers that are hands down the number one issue facing the church.
Second most important issue should be whether to stand or kneel during the prayer, hold hands or not hold hands, and of course if we need to raise our arms earlier.
Pope Soros.
The idea is to open the door here for “better” interpretation of other scriptures.
My most recent Missal of interest was published in what..1962?
"Lead us, not into temptation
A comma clears this all up.
ML/NJ
At Latin mass, we “et ne nos inducas in tentationem sed libera nos a malo.”
The biggest fake news of the century is that Bergoglio is a humble guy. What kind of massive ego does it take to think you can change the the Lord’s Prayer? Such incredible hubris. He says that the prayer makes no sense to him because the Father would never lead us into temptation in the first place, so voila, he thinks he can do better. Ugh. What an egotistical a-hole.
I intend to say it the way I always have.
“I was afraid it was going to be something radical, like:
And lead us not into xenophobia
But deliver us from climate change”
Please, don’t give him ideas. :-)
#SWIDT
Good point - the change is at best no improvement.
Whaaattt?? Can’t hear you .....”
“Second most important issue should be whether to stand or kneel during the prayer, hold hands or not hold hands, and of course if we need to raise our arms earlier.”
Just wait for the Papal Bull “Hokeus Pokeus”, where his holiness will explain the proper time to put one in foot, then take it out, then shake it all about.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.