Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why ‘Mary Did You Know’ Is The Most Biblically Illiterate Christmas Tune
The Federalist ^ | Holly Scheer

Posted on 12/14/2019 2:22:11 PM PST by SeekAndFind

According to the Washington Post, the Christmas song “Mary, Did You Know” should be tabled because talking about Mary’s virginity is part of purity culture, which is destructive for rape victims. But there are far bigger and more accurate reasons to axe this song from Christmas playlists. “Mary Did You Know” is one of these newer Christmas classics that deserves to be called neither a classic nor a Christmas song. That’s because it’s biblically illiterate, and Christmas descends directly from the Bible and the Word made flesh who gave it to us.

Mary Did You Know” (let’s call it MDYK to make life easier) entered the scene during the rise of the praise and worship Christian music genre in 1991, written and performed by members of the Gaither Vocal Band. The Gaithers, popular gospel singers with a Southern flair, have produced a ton of contemporary Christian music for nearly four decades. Since then, MDYK has somehow become a song not only played on the radio but sung in churches, moving it from generic Christian mistake to doctrinally baffling gaffe.

Anyone actually listening to the words who has even a slight familiarity with the biblical account of Christ’s conception and birth shouldn’t need to ask if Mary knew, because the Bible plainly tells us she did.

Oh, Mary Knew

MDYK is a series of questions, all aimed at asking pregnant Mary, the mother of Jesus, various things about her soon-to-be-born son and Messiah. I counted 17 questions, ranging from if she knew that her baby was God himself to questions about his miracles.

Unfortunately, these questions fall in line with the disturbing new trend of presenting the Nativity narrative as a story of Mary being raped by God, and taking turns blaming both Mary and the patriarchy for how women feel during Advent. Together, these ideas question what Mary knew and what she agreed to, and both of these lines of thinking miss the important and pertinent fact that in the Bible Mary herself sings an entire song about her pregnancy.

To answer the questions MDYK poses: Yes, Mary knew she was having God’s Son. Luke 1:30-33, 35 answers this clearly: “And the angel said to her, ‘Do not be afraid, Mary, for you have found favor with God. And behold, you will conceive in your womb and bear a son, and you shall call his name Jesus. He will be great and will be called the Son of the Most High. And the Lord God will give to him the throne of his father David, and he will reign over the house of Jacob forever, and of his kingdom there will be no end.’ And the angel answered her, ‘The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you; therefore the child to be born will be called holy—the Son of God.’”

Yep, Mary knew that her baby boy was God himself. Even easier to answer is whether Mary consented to bear the Son of God. Her response on the subject was: “Behold, I am the servant of the Lord; let it be to me according to your word” (Luke 1:38).

Mary Has Her Own Better Christmas Song

History has given us a far more beautiful and accurate song for Christmas about Mary, one that actually confesses the truth about her, God’s plan, and that tiny baby. That song is the one Mary herself sang, and it’s one that churches around the world still regularly sing: the Magnificat, or Song of Mary:

My soul magnifies the Lord, and my spirit rejoices in God my Savior, for he has looked on the humble estate of his servant. For behold, from now on all generations will call me blessed; for he who is mighty has done great things for me, and holy is his name. And his mercy is for those who fear him from generation to generation. He has shown strength with his arm; he has scattered the proud in the thoughts of their hearts; he has brought down the mighty from their thrones and exalted those of humble estate; he has filled the hungry with good things, and the rich he has sent away empty. He has helped his servant Israel, in remembrance of his mercy, as he spoke to our fathers, to Abraham and to his offspring forever (Luke 1:47-55).

Don’t expect the world to get Mary right when they still can’t manage to get Jesus right on Christmas. Don’t be surprised when pop stars want to sing about Christmas without actually reading the Bible.

Making a Christmas album is not a necessarily a confession of personal Christian faith (see Barbra Streisand’s “Classic Christmas” album). Society has never understood the Annunciation, Visitation, or Nativity, and they’re not going to start now. Instead of getting frustrated at people who think Mary didn’t consent, or that if she did she didn’t know the plan for her baby, go read the gospel accounts of Jesus’s birth where she speaks for herself. It’s enough of a fantastical and amazing story without trying millennia later to add contemporary drama.

Mary shows us a picture of a faithful woman, delighted by the honor God bestowed on her to bear the savior of the world, and that’s how we should remember her.



TOPICS: Religion & Culture; Theology
KEYWORDS: bible; catholic; christmas; mary; marydidyouknow; song
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-124 next last
To: Robert DeLong

The title. The constant repetition as though Mary is a 3 year old child.

It’s insulting and demeaning too. Ooo ooo ooo.

Then there is the marginal musicianship of most performances of this thing to which I have been subjected. The rhyming and cadence are what I would expect from a 5th grade group poetry project.

You go ahead and like it all you like. Just don’t play it for me, I’ll walk away.


61 posted on 12/14/2019 6:02:03 PM PST by Don W (When blacks riot, neighbourhoods and cities burn. When whites riot, nations and continents burn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

Amen!

The contemplative questions are not answered in the other sones or scriptures quoted.

The shallow piety that pops up on FR from time to time is not impressive.


62 posted on 12/14/2019 6:09:10 PM PST by gov_bean_ counter (Trump didnÂ’t want an AG, he wanted a consigliere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

I headed straight to youtube to listen to it, again. They do a great version!


63 posted on 12/14/2019 6:09:13 PM PST by ozaukeemom (9/11/01 Never Forget. Never.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Don W

Ok.

Thanks.

Bye.


64 posted on 12/14/2019 6:09:40 PM PST by Ken Regis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

Because she was a normal human girl!


65 posted on 12/14/2019 6:10:00 PM PST by Mom MD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Mom MD

The author is after something else.

Boring ... comes around every year.

I haven’t noticed, this year, the folks with the screeds against celebrating Jesus’s birth on December 25. Maybe they lost interest.


66 posted on 12/14/2019 6:12:39 PM PST by Tax-chick (Tomado de la mano, yo voy con Cristo a donde El va!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Don W

Well, bye.


67 posted on 12/14/2019 6:16:42 PM PST by gov_bean_ counter (Trump didnÂ’t want an AG, he wanted a consigliere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Only on free republic can folks be nasty about a well intended Christmas song

I swunny

It’s embarrassing


68 posted on 12/14/2019 6:17:57 PM PST by wardaddy (I applaud Jim Robinson for his comments on the Southern Monuments decision ...thank you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy

On Free Republic, we’re just discussing articles from other sites where people were nasty about a well-intentioned Christmas song. It’s the whole Internet, full of garbage.


69 posted on 12/14/2019 6:19:57 PM PST by Tax-chick (Tomado de la mano, yo voy con Cristo a donde El va!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

Free Republic has always been this way the scold the only redeeming factor is that now that theirs competitors Breitbart is worse and their moderation is Looney Tunes for instance if you write the words Jew or savage you get reviewed
Free Republic is still the best fourm tbut there are a lot of unhappy people here

And we have lost so many posters

A lot of important articles do not find her way here where is the used to always be posted here

Another weird thing about Breitbart forum is if you say you post on free republic the yank your post


70 posted on 12/14/2019 6:25:56 PM PST by wardaddy (I applaud Jim Robinson for his comments on the Southern Monuments decision ...thank you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Don W
I think they should add a final stanza:

Mary replies
Yes I know
For the heavenly angels
They told me so

I see it differently, in that they are not quizzing her like a 3 year old, it is more like did she know that she bore the son of God and that he will bring salvation to mankind. You are being far too critical regarding something that is really quite benign. I mean after all it's only a song, that sings the praises of Jesus. Mankind is known for their curiosity, and the song uses that reality as a lead in only, in order to sing the praises of Jesus.

I see your argument as equally without standing as those who take the metoo attitude that it implies God raped Mary and saddled her with an unwanted pregnancy (though the latter is far more egregious). Both though are reading way too much into a song that was designed to sing the praises of Jesus, in my opinion. One because of religious convictions, and one because they are completely devoid of any religious convictions, who want to stamp out all religions. In no way does it even deserve the scrutiny, again in my opinion, because it is merely a song.

Besides that the version I provided was sang very beautifully. I was meriting the song on its musical quality, rather than based on any religious beliefs I hold as true.

71 posted on 12/14/2019 6:31:18 PM PST by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I love Rascal Flatts’ version of it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmtPxgb0sgk

I haven’t considered it a Christmas song. But with Netflix blaspheming the Lord and Merry Christmas barely being spoken, I never thought anyone would criticize such a beautiful song.


72 posted on 12/14/2019 6:47:09 PM PST by Luke21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Luke21
...With Netflix blaspheming the Lord and Merry Christmas barely being spoken, I never thought anyone would criticize such a beautiful song.

Why, indeed, pick on a cute little tune with a Christian message when "Grandma Got Run Over by a Reindeer," "Santa, Baby" and "All I Want for Christmas Is My Two Front Teeth"--none of which are the least bit biblically literate--are jarring our ears?

73 posted on 12/14/2019 7:36:23 PM PST by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege
It’s not my favorite song...


Ten days to go, and I am already burned out on Christmas music. Just sayin.
74 posted on 12/14/2019 7:43:50 PM PST by The_Media_never_lie (Please, oh pretty please let Crazy Uncle Joe Biden be the nominee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Anyone actually listening to the words who has even a slight familiarity with the biblical account of Christ’s conception and birth shouldn’t need to ask if Mary knew, because the Bible plainly tells us she did.

There is nothing in the bible that indicates Mary knew the answers to the questions in the song...

75 posted on 12/14/2019 7:55:09 PM PST by Iscool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John S Mosby

Nice words...Not a very catchy tune...


76 posted on 12/14/2019 8:03:30 PM PST by Iscool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
The whole POINT of the song is NOT whether Mary knew her baby was the Son of God. The POINT of the song is the phrase “.....Did you know He would soon be saving you...?” The point of the song is that Mary was not sinless and needed a Savior every bit as much as anyone!! Only Jesus is the Savior, the Messiah, and only He was sinless. Mary was not perfect and is NOT a “co-redemptrix” with Jesus, and she is NOT the “spouse of the Holy Spirit” (as the Catholic church has erroneously proclaimed). I believe the song Mary Did You Know is a wonderful and needed Christmas song!!! 💝💝💝👵🏻 It’s lyrics brings out truth and makes us think!!!
77 posted on 12/14/2019 8:15:32 PM PST by CAGOPgramma (In God we still trust!! Love Truth!! Pray for President Trump!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe; SeekAndFind
I guess the author of this stupid screed has no idea of what a Rhetorical Question is....The author needs to attack Jimgle Bells.

The reaction would be best understood by the author likely being a Catholic worshiper.

In the light of which questions that could be asked in the song might be,

Mary, did you know,

Many will pray to you, reciting a sacred Psalter?

Mary, did you know,

That they will plead to you, please save each son and daughter?

Mary, did you know,

That they will ascribe to you things quite very new?

That attributes unique to God almighty,

will soon be said of you?

Mary, did you know,

they will say "all but unlimited power" is in thy hand?

And so to their Mary will look the eyes of many a man?

Mary did you know,

That they will say demons are fearful of your might rod;

And that your requests are as commands even to almighty God?

Mary, did you know,

it will be said, by far more than just a few;

That as Queen of Heaven all grace is dispensed thru you?

And that you suffered for our sins, and was raised bodily,

that salvation is more quickly obtained by calling on thee?

No, Mary you do not know

All this exalting of a mortal far above that which is written;

But whom you will reprove as part of the judgment in Heaven,

For directing men to look to a demigoddess savior of man,

Rather than directly to your creator yet child, the Great I Am.

78 posted on 12/14/2019 8:19:44 PM PST by daniel1212 ( Trust the risen Lord Jesus to save you as a damned and destitute sinner + be baptized + follow Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

Has anyone written a treatise on the Theological Errors in Jingle Bells.

It’s just a song. Nobody’s soul is in danger by singing it.

Frankly it’s a really good song.


79 posted on 12/14/2019 8:59:05 PM PST by P-Marlowe (Freep mail me if you want to be on my Fingerstyle Acoustic Guitar Ping List)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

It’s a pretty song. Not among my favorites, but a lot of people like it. Some people have too much time on their hands.


80 posted on 12/14/2019 9:16:33 PM PST by Some Fat Guy in L.A. (Still bitterly clinging to rational thought despite it's unfashionability)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-124 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson