Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Where Hal Lindsey Went Wrong
Prophecy Questions blog ^ | June 30, 2019 | Charles S. Meek

Posted on 06/30/2019 7:12:34 PM PDT by grumpa

Hal Lindsey’s book “The Late Great Planet Earth,” written in 1970, sold over 28 million copies. Gullible Christians got sucked into Lindsey’s soon end-of-the world poppycock. As time has passed without his version of Armageddon taking place, we can now objectively analyze where Lindsey went wrong:

• Lindsey (p. 54, 181), like other dispensationalists, placed the beginning of the end with Israel becoming a nation in 1948. He thought all prophecy would be fulfilled within a 40-year generation (Matthew 24:34). But 1988 came and went, proving him to be a false prophet. (This should be adequate proof that 1948 has nothing to do with Bible prophecy.)

• Lindsey (p. 44) prophesied a 7-year, world-wide, tribulation. He got this from Revelation 11 which speaks of the “holy city” being trampled for 42 months—and “two witnesses prophesying” for 1,260 days. He simply adds both of these 3 ½-year periods together to get 7 years (of tribulation). There is no indication in the text that this is a valid interpretation. He was reading something speculative into the text that is not there. Indeed, there is no passage in the Bible that clearly teaches a 7-year tribulation. Further, Jesus limited the time of the trampling of Jerusalem to his own generation (Luke 21:22, 32). (Interestingly, the final assault on Jerusalem by the Roman army under Titus lasted 42 months from AD 67 to AD 70.)

• Lindsey (p. 87, etc.) saw the existence of nuclear weapons as an important sign of the end times. However, Jesus taught that the so-called end times would be when God’s people would “fall by the edge of the sword” (Luke 21:24). Jesus’ prophecies were about ancient warfare, not modern nuclear weapons. The context of this prophecy by Jesus was about the coming destruction of the temple (Luke 21:6). Jesus told his listeners that it would happen when THEY saw Jerusalem surrounded by armies (Luke 21:20), in THEIR generation (Luke 21:32). This all happened when the Roman armies invaded Jerusalem in AD 67-70.

• Lindsey (p. 56-57) said, “It is certain that the Temple will be rebuilt. Prophecy demands it.” Problem is, not a single verse of the Bible can be mustered to support a future rebuilding of the temple. This idea is merely an invention of dispensationalists to try to justify their theory.

• Lindsey (p. 88, 124) even makes this astounding prediction: “The prophetic Scriptures tell us that the Roman Empire will be revived shortly before the return of Christ to this earth. A new Caesar will head this empire.” It’s hard to believe anyone took this charlatan Lindsey seriously.

• Lindsey (p. 108), in speaking of the Antichrist, “He will have a magnetic personality, be personally attractive, and a powerful speaker. He will be able to mesmerize an audience with his oratory.” But the Antichrist is never mentioned in Revelation, let alone any such description of him. The Antichrist is only mentioned in John’s epistles, which say that the Antichrist was already in the world when John was writing (1 John 4:3). Indeed, John taught that it was already the “last hour” as he wrote (1 John 2:18). If you believe John was an inspired writer, this precludes any future fulfillment.

• Lindsey (p. 125, 126) said that modern drug addiction and witchcraft is evidence of the “sorceries” of Revelation 9:21. He quoted a TV station that “Nearly every respectable high school these days has its own witch.” (Besides the obvious problem of nonsense, Revelation itself teaches that it is about things that MUST SHORTLY TAKE PLACE (Revelation 1:1; 22:6). Indeed, there are over 30 passages in Revelation that reiterate that its fulfillment was “near,” “soon,” or “about to happen.”

• Lindsey said that we should take the Bible literally (p. 176). Obviously, he doesn’t take the over 100 imminence statements literally—that biblical prophecy would be fulfilled SOON, AT HAND, BEFORE SOME IN THE FIRST CENTURY HAD DIED, IN THEIR GENERATION, etc. (Matthew 10:23; 16:27-28; 24:34; Luke 21:22; Acts 2:14-20; Hebrews 1:2; 10:37; 1 Peter 4:7, 17; etc., etc.)

• Lindsey (p. 133) said that the Harlot Babylon is some future one-world religious system “clothed in purple and scarlet.” But, Revelation itself teaches that Babylon is “the great city” (Revelation 18:10) upon whom wrath was to come. The Great City Babylon is clearly identified as Jerusalem (Revelation 11:8)! Further, purple and scarlet are the colors of the ritual dress of the high priest (Exodus 28:5-6; 39:1-2). So, the evidence supports the view that Revelation is about God’s judgment on Old Covenant Israel.

• Lindsey thought that Revelation was written in 95 AD. But there are some two dozen clues within Revelation that it was written prior to AD 70. Revelation refers to events that match the historical record of the Jewish-Roman War of AD 66-70. The book was written DURING the “tribulation” per Revelation 1:9, apparently while the temple was still standing per Revelation 11:1, and during the reign of the sixth emperor of Rome per Revelation 17:10—that is, Nero who died in AD 68. Over 130 scholars have been identified as holding to the pre-AD 70 date of Revelation.

• Lindsey (p. 164) thought the Day of the Lord predicted in the book of Joel is in our future. But the inspired apostle Peter taught that Joel’s prediction was being fulfilled in his own day (Acts 2:14-20).

• Lindsey (p. 179) taught that the “elements” of 2 Peter 3 that would be destroyed refer to the “most basic element of nature”—thus the physical universe. But EVERY TIME in the New Testament that the word “elements” (Greek, stoicheion) is used, it refers to the elements of the old covenant (Galatians 4:3, 9; Colossians 2:8, 20-22; Hebrews 5:12-13). So, what was to be destroyed? — the old covenant, not the physical universe (Hebrews 8:13).

• Lindsey (p. 180, 181) references Daniel 12 as predicting the end of the world. But Daniel 12 itself says that the “TIME OF THE END” would be when the power of the holy people would be shattered and the daily sacrifices for sin taken away. That clearly happened in AD 70 with the fall of Jerusalem and destruction of the temple. Daniel 12 could not be clearer.

• Lindsey (p. 176) taught, as do all premillennialists, that Christ will establish a literal, physical kingdom on earth. But Jesus said that his kingdom is “not of this world” (John 18:36).

I could go on. But this is enough to demonstrate that Hal Lindsey is a deceiver and a false prophet. Lindsey is reported to be worth $42 million, which is, apparently, after his first three wives got their share. (He is married to his fourth wife.) Hal Lindsey has not only bilked millions of people out of their money, he has made a mockery of Christianity.


TOPICS: Theology
KEYWORDS: bible; hal; hallindsey; lategreatplanetearth; lindsey; prophecy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-133 next last
To: grumpa
Obviously, he doesn’t take the over 100 imminence statements literally—that biblical prophecy would be fulfilled SOON, AT HAND, BEFORE SOME IN THE FIRST CENTURY HAD DIED, IN THEIR GENERATION, etc.

The phrase "in their generation" (or "your generation") is not found in the bible.

Truly I say to you, this generation will not pass away until all these things take place.

The generation that Jesus speaks of “not passing” until He returns is a future generation, namely, the people living when the predicted events occur. The word "generation" refers to the people alive in the future when the events of Matthew 24–25 take place.

Jesus’ point in His statement, “this generation will not pass away until all these things take place,” is that the events of the end times will happen quickly. Once the signs of the end begin to be observed, the end is well on the way—the second coming and the judgment will occur within that last generation.

21 posted on 06/30/2019 8:03:27 PM PDT by lasereye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CondorFlight

Sorry, but to me, the word “huckster” comes to mind. YMMV.

CC


22 posted on 06/30/2019 8:05:29 PM PDT by Celtic Conservative (My cats are more amusing than 200 channels worth of TV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: grumpa

Prophecy ping.


23 posted on 06/30/2019 8:05:34 PM PDT by Lowell1775
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: semaj

Revelation ch. 11 doesn’t mention Jerusalem at all. Yet it’s “clearly identified as Jerusalem” by 11:8?


24 posted on 06/30/2019 8:11:04 PM PDT by lasereye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: grumpa
Paul, the author of a large portion of the New Testament even uses the word dispensation, so your opening premise is agenda laden.

Don't take the mark when it is commanded to you. Just don't take the Mark.

25 posted on 06/30/2019 8:14:01 PM PDT by MHGinTN (A dispensation perspective is a powerful tool for discernment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grumpa

BTW, the very assertion made in this screed post is fulfilling prophecy of how the end tiems unfold. Way to go, meathead.


26 posted on 06/30/2019 8:15:01 PM PDT by MHGinTN (A dispensation perspective is a powerful tool for discernment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grumpa

And the Reformers (Luther, Calvin, Knox for example) never taught that there would be a 7 year tribulation etc.


27 posted on 06/30/2019 8:15:30 PM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57 returning after lurking since 2000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer

His style does get tedious! Give Jack van Impe a try ... bless you for your tolerance on your gran’s behalf.


28 posted on 06/30/2019 8:17:06 PM PDT by MHGinTN (A dispensation perspective is a powerful tool for discernment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: boatbums

Jesus said that it would happen it their generation, and they believed this. In the book of Revelation he told them these things would happen soon. Why is this so hard to accept????


29 posted on 06/30/2019 8:25:26 PM PDT by impactplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Deaf Smith

Better yet ask So Gore


30 posted on 06/30/2019 8:30:10 PM PDT by Kartographer ("We mutually pledge to each other our lives our fortunes and our sacred honor.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: boatbums

Thanks for you reply about the dating of Revelation. You have cited ancient writers but most if not all of them were relying on a third hand ambiguous statement by Ireneaus from around AD 160-180. Not only can his statement have different interpretations, Irenaeus is known to have made other historical errors such as saying that Jesus lived to be about 50. A much earlier witness was Papias who said the John was martyred by the Jews, which would have to have been when they could have accomplished this—before AD 70 when they were in control before Jerusalem’s fall. I did not go in depth in this article about the dating of Revelation, but I have multiple articles at my site in section B, including “Revelation: It’s Central Theme Illuminated,” “Who is the Harlot Babylon of Revelation,” “Who Were the 144,000 of Revelation,” “When Was Revelation Written,” etc. Here is the link:

https://prophecyquestions.com/2016/02/01/articles-by-charles-meek


31 posted on 06/30/2019 8:34:03 PM PDT by grumpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: impactplayer
The Discourse in Luke is different from the Olivet Discourse. The Luke discourse was offered in the Temple, then Jesus and a few crossed over to the Mount of Olives where Jesus gave these inner circle members the Olivet Discourse in response to their pressing for more than what they heard in the Temple Discourse.

In the Temple Discourse, Jesus warned the people hearing Him that Jerusalem would soon be razed and to flee the city when Armies began camping all around. This was fulfilled when the Roman armies encircled the city but delayed their attack while their commander went back to Rome to participate in the Caesar succession. Then, after he was appointed Caesar He and his son attacked.

Jesus foretold that not one stone would remain upon another of the Temple his disciple saw gleaming in the sun as they crossed from the Temple to the Mount of Olives.

32 posted on 06/30/2019 8:35:43 PM PDT by MHGinTN (A dispensation perspective is a powerful tool for discernment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: semaj

Semaj, Revelation 18:10 identifies Babylon as “the great city.” The first time “the great city” is mentioned in Revelation is 11:8, where she is clearly identified as “the city where the Lord was slain.” Pretty simple, actually.


33 posted on 06/30/2019 8:36:44 PM PDT by grumpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: grumpa

Maybe Lindsey was a mormon...

In 1840 Joey Smith the guy who invented the religion of mormonism so called ‘prophesied” that end of the world would be in 80 years...1920 came and went...


34 posted on 06/30/2019 8:56:48 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grumpa
Trust in the LORD with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding. Proverbs 3:5
35 posted on 06/30/2019 8:57:16 PM PDT by Robwin (very)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer

I am confused.

If they believe in the rapture and that it would happen that way, then why are they concerned? Wouldn’t they expect that they would be going with the pilots?


36 posted on 06/30/2019 8:57:47 PM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s........you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: grumpa

Nah the theories have just been recalibrated. It’s very similar to globull warming.


37 posted on 06/30/2019 9:16:30 PM PDT by DariusBane (Liberty and Risk. Flip sides of the same coin. So how much risk will YOU accept? Vive Deo et Vives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: campaignPete R-CT

Bkmk Hal Lindsay


38 posted on 06/30/2019 9:29:39 PM PDT by ptsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer

All Jews are Messianic.


39 posted on 06/30/2019 9:44:02 PM PDT by freedomjusticeruleoflaw (Strange that a man with his wealth would have to resort to prostitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CondorFlight

Don’t mind the criticism. People don’t like being told they fall short on their duties. Back in the 70’s Hal’s books helped me to start to understand scripture and to not fear Satan, and to trust what God says. It took me another 20 years to understand the need to actually receive Christ. But God is so faithful, and then I really began understanding the Bible. Hal Lindsay was just part of God’s journey for me. And probably for many.


40 posted on 06/30/2019 9:49:11 PM PDT by CAGOPgramma (In God we still trust!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-133 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson