Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Did Christ’s Glorified Body Still Have Wounds?
Archdiocese of Washington ^ | 04-29-19 | Msgr. Charles Pope

Posted on 04/30/2019 8:45:39 AM PDT by Salvation

Why Did Christ’s Glorified Body Still Have Wounds?

Several of the Resurrection accounts stress that Jesus showed the disciples His wounds. On one level we can understand that He was trying to make clear to them that the same Christ who was crucified stood before them; He was not a ghost or an apparition or simply someone who looked like Jesus.

When Christ rose, He took up His same, true body, but it now manifested a perfected glory. When we rise on the last day, the same will be true of our bodies. Why, then, were Christ’s wounds visible in His glorified body? Are not wounds and scars inconsistent with a glorified body?

St. Thomas Aquinas provides five reasons that Christ’s wounds are fitting in His glorified body. His reflections, from the Summa Theologiae III, Q. 54, Art. 4, are beautiful and poignant. St. Thomas’ words are presented below in bold, black italics, while my remarks appear in red text.

It was fitting for Christ’s soul at His Resurrection to resume the body with its scars. In the first place, for Christ’s own glory. For Bede says on Luke 24:40 that He kept His scars not from inability to heal them, “but to wear them as an everlasting trophy of His victory.” Hence Augustine says (De Civ. Dei xxii): “Perhaps in that kingdom we shall see on the bodies of the Martyrs the traces of the wounds which they bore for Christ’s name: because it will not be a deformity, but a dignity in them; and a certain kind of beauty will shine in them, in the body, though not of the body.”

Christ’s wounds are a dignity not a deformity, a sign of love not of loss, an indication of obedience not of onerousness. Through His wounds the Lord can say, “Here is what the world did to me, yet I live. Here is the cost of your redemption and the lavishness of my love.”

Secondly, to confirm the hearts of the disciples as to “the faith in His Resurrection” (Bede, on Luke 24:40).

This is what theologians refer to as “continuity.” The wounds demonstrate that the body that died on the cross is the same one the disciples see standing before them. Jesus has not taken up or fashioned a new body or a similar one; He is truly risen. The Greek word for resurrection is anastasis, which literally means “to stand again.” The word “resurrection” means the same thing: re (again) + surrexit (he stands). None of this would be true if a different body were before them, no matter how similar. Thus, Christ’s wounds confirm the truth of the resurrection.

Thirdly, “that when He pleads for us with the Father, He may always show the manner of death He endured for us” (Bede, on Luke 24:40).

Beautiful! The picture here is of the Son, Jesus, showing His wounds to His Father and saying, “See how I have loved them, Father. Have mercy on them.”

The Book of Hebrews says, Consequently, Jesus is able to save to the uttermost those who draw near to God through him, since he always lives to make intercession for them. For it was indeed fitting that we should have such a high priest, holy, innocent, unstained, separated from sinners, and exalted above the heavens. He has no need, like those high priests, to offer sacrifices daily, first for his own sins and then for those of the people, since he did this once for all when he offered up himself (Heb 7:25-27).

Fourthly, “that He may convince those redeemed in His blood, how mercifully they have been helped, as He exposes before them the traces of the same death” (Bede, on Luke 24:40).

To those who doubt the Lord’s love or His understanding of our trials, Christ’s wounds speak tenderly and clearly of His love and of the price He was willing to pay for us. His wounds are more eloquent testimony than any words could be. Is God merciful? Does God understand or care at all about our condition? Look to the wounds of Christ; dwell in them; take shelter in them.

Lastly, “that in the Judgment Day He may upbraid them with their just condemnation” (Bede, on Luke 24:40). Hence, as Augustine says (De Symb. ii): “… So will [Christ] show His wounds to His enemies, so that He who is the Truth may convict them, saying: ‘Behold the man whom you crucified; see the wounds you inflicted; recognize the side you pierced, since it was opened by you and for you, yet you would not enter.’”

Such powerful and moving word, in this case from St Augustine. There is also a refutation of the idea that God is simply harsh on Judgment Day. In effect, He will say, “I endured suffering from you out of love for you. When I was on the cross, the soldier pierced my side. My heart was literally opened for you and still you would not enter. What more could I have done than to allow your own sins to be your redemption? Still you refused.”

In spite of receiving lifelong graces and unmerited favors and blessings, in spite of God’s call echoing in their depths, many still refuse God’s offer. It is a tragedy that some hearts are so hardened. Christ’s wounds testify to the justice of God’s only (and final) recourse: allowing them to live apart from Him. Accepting the choice of their free will, God’s last act is simply to recognize their refusal and say, “you would not enter.”

Dwell in the wounds of Christ.



TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; History; Theology
KEYWORDS: catholic
Video
1 posted on 04/30/2019 8:45:39 AM PDT by Salvation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway; NYer; ELS; Pyro7480; livius; ArrogantBustard; Catholicguy; RobbyS; marshmallow; ...

Monsignor Pope Ping!


2 posted on 04/30/2019 8:46:48 AM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

I was hoping for a new body.


3 posted on 04/30/2019 8:48:07 AM PDT by TexasGator (Z1z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
What do people make of the claim that the ending to the Gospel of Mark that describes the sightings of Jesus was added much later and is not included in the original Greek manuscripts?

As believers how do we reconcile ?

https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/biblical-topics/new-testament/the-strange-ending-of-the-gospel-of-mark-and-why-it-makes-all-the-difference/

4 posted on 04/30/2019 8:59:13 AM PDT by seastay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

He showed them His hands, feet, and side. The wounds are implicitly, but not explicitly, referenced by the Evangelists.


5 posted on 04/30/2019 9:09:34 AM PDT by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Jesus showed his crucifixion wounds to Thomas.


6 posted on 04/30/2019 9:10:40 AM PDT by Dalberg-Acton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Scholars agree that the Gospels mostly came from a Source Document called the Q Document. It was probably a travel diary.

The Q Document formed the standard basis for the synoptic Gospels along with special stories associated with the writer. Mark tells the story of running off naked in the night. That Story has no reason for being there, except it was probably the Author Mark, himself.

It is clear that Mark also had additional content that was probably not Mark. But, it was someone else who was there at the time. It was certainly contemperanous to the original writing. It was NOT added hundreds of years later.


7 posted on 04/30/2019 9:11:12 AM PDT by MattMusson (Sometimes the wind blows too much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
'The life is in the blood'

In His resurrection body, Jesus drew life from the spirit not the blood. The blood was poured out for our atonement.

8 posted on 04/30/2019 9:14:25 AM PDT by MHGinTN (A dispensation perspective is a powerful tool for discernment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

I don’t think this was the glorified body.

After he ascended 40 days later, in heaven.


9 posted on 04/30/2019 9:17:11 AM PDT by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan

The holes do make it easier to attach figurines or what have you, so there might be a practicality element.


10 posted on 04/30/2019 9:21:27 AM PDT by golux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MattMusson
"Scholars agree that the Gospels mostly came from a Source Document called the Q Document."

No, they certainly don't agree on the "Q" source. Some scholars believe this however the vast majority don't. The fact that not one of the earliest Church fathers never references such a document despite that fact that they quote extensively from the Gospels makes such a document unlikely. If such a document existed so widely at the time that it was the basis for the synoptic Gospels then it would certainly be mentioned.

11 posted on 04/30/2019 9:37:48 AM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan

Bur disciples, apostles, etc. didn’t recognize him. It had to be a glorified body.


12 posted on 04/30/2019 10:18:32 AM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Why DOES Christ’s body still have wounds? You had it in the incorrect tense. Christ is alive forevermore, and will display the marks of His sacrificial wounds forever. Because that’s how The Father wants it. They are not merely surface scars. Those who’ve seen them said they are holes from the spikes which caused them, that you can see through. Those healed wounds are TROPHIES!


13 posted on 04/30/2019 10:52:29 AM PDT by Tucker39 ("It ishttps://y impossible to rightly govern a nation without God and the Bible." George Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

bump


14 posted on 04/30/2019 11:13:18 AM PDT by Albion Wilde (In war, there can be no substitute for victory. --Douglas MacArthur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan

Yes, wouldn’t the glorified body be what the disciples saw during the transfiguration?


15 posted on 04/30/2019 11:34:51 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

“Yes, wouldn’t the glorified body be what the disciples saw during the transfiguration?”

Yes.


16 posted on 04/30/2019 2:11:55 PM PDT by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
**Burt disciples, apostles, etc. didn’t recognize him. It had to be a glorified body.**
17 posted on 04/30/2019 5:21:33 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: seastay

Standard university theologians seem to be atheists. They start from a standard of hostility to Christianity. I don’t know if you’ve ever taken a theology class. The way to combat what they claim is to simply ask for primary sources. Never accept anything less.

I used to be a subscriber to Biblical Archeology. I dropped it when they consolidated with their theology journal. It was like reading the musings of potheads dressed up in academic speak.


18 posted on 04/30/2019 5:25:16 PM PDT by Varda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson