Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Does Jesus Mean When He Tells Mary Magdalene Not to Cling to Him Because He Has Not ...?
Archdiocese of Washington ^ | 04-22-19 | Msgr. Charles Pope

Posted on 04/23/2019 9:57:52 AM PDT by Salvation

What Does Jesus Mean When He Tells Mary Magdalene Not to Cling to Him Because He Has Not Yet Ascended?

As the Easter Octave unfolds, we have in the Gospel this enigmatic statement of Our Lord Jesus to Mary Magdalene:

Do not cling to me, for I have not yet ascended to the Father; but go to my brothers and say to them, “I am ascending to My Father and your Father, to My God and your God” (John 20:17).

There is much to ponder and distinguish here.

First, we should set aside certain previous translations that rendered “Do not cling to me” as “Do not touch me.”

The latter sounds almost rude. The Greek expression Μή μου ἅπτου (Me mou haptou) is best rendered, “Do not go on clinging to me” because haptou is a verb in the middle voice.

The middle voice is one that English lacks. It is midway between the active and passive voices and indicates that the subject of the verb (in this case, Mary) both acts and is acted upon. Mary lays hold of the Lord but needs to do so because something is different. Something deeper is being shown to her and she is missing that. Mary actively sees Jesus but passively needs to receive something new about Him. This is the middle voice, containing elements of both the active and the passive.

Further, as Strong’s Greek dictionary sets forth, ἅπτω (haptou) means “to fasten to,” “to adhere to,” or “to cling to.” What the Lord asks of Mary is that she not merely cling to what is familiar but step back and see what is new. Jesus is no longer a mere rabbi or teacher. He is not merely the Jesus she knew; He is Lord and He is risen.

Second, we must ponder what Jesus means when He says that He is ascending.

St. Thomas Aquinas summarizes St. Augustine and St. John Chrysostom on the meaning of the Lord’s ascending:

[Augustine says] “… Jesus would have us to believe in Him, i.e., to touch Him spiritually, as being Himself one with the Father. For to that man’s innermost perceptions He is, in some sort, ascended unto the Father, who has become so far proficient in Him, as to recognize in Him the equal with the Father … whereas she as yet believed in Him but carnally, since she wept for Him as for a man.” Or as Chrysostom says (Hom. lxxxvi in Joan.): “This woman wanted to converse with Christ just as before the Passion, and out of joy was thinking of nothing great, although Christ’s flesh had become much nobler by rising again.” And therefore He said: “I have not yet ascended to My Father”; as if to say: “Do not suppose I am leading an earthly life; for if you see Me upon earth, it is because I have not yet ascended to My Father, but I am going to ascend shortly.” Hence He goes on to say: “I ascend to My Father, and to your Father” (Summa Theologiae III, Q. 55, Art. 6, Reply to Obj. 3).

In other words, Jesus’ ascent must take place in Mary (and in every other follower). He is far more than a man resuming mortal nature. He is more; He is Lord. We must come to see Him as Lord and God. He must ascend in our sight. We must see Him at a higher level and in a higher way. He is no mere sage or rabbi; He is Lord and God! He must ascend in this way, in our understanding.

In Jesus’ public ministry, Mary had rightly reverenced Jesus as teacher and rabbi, but Jesus the Lord is doing more now than merely leading an earthly life and fitting into earthly categories.

In effect, Jesus is saying to Mary, “Don’t go on clinging to what in Me is familiar to you. Step back, take a good look, and then go tell my brothers what you see.”

When Mary Magdalene has done this, she runs to the apostles and says, “I have seen the LORD” (Jn 20:18). I show the word “LORD” in uppercase in this quote because up until this point, Mary used the word “Lord” as a title of human respect. She said, “They have taken my Lord and I don’t know where they have put Him.” Of course, one doesn’t take Him and put Him anywhere! He is LORD, and He does as He pleases. No longer clinging to Him in merely a familiar way, Mary now says, “I have seen the LORD,” meaning it in a plenary and divine sense.

For Mary, the Lord is ascending. She is seeing Him in a higher way. The Lord has ascended for Mary Magdalene. Has He ascended for you?

Finally, what of the Lord’s expression that He is ascending to “My Father and your Father, to My God and your God”?

In English, we can use the word “and” in either an equivalent or a comparative sense. I could say to someone, “You are my brother and my friend.” This uses the “and of equivalence” because it indicates that you are both a brother and a friend to me in the same or in an equivalent way.

Other uses of the word “and” indicate a more comparative sense. When we say that Jesus is Son of God and Son of Mary, we mean that He is the Son of His Father in a different way than He is Son of Mary. He is the Son of both but in very different ways. In the liturgy, when the priest says, “Pray, brethren, that my sacrifice and yours may be acceptable to God the almighty Father,” he indicates that while his sacrifice and the sacrifice of the people are both sacrifices, they are sacrifices in different ways. The priest acts in persona Christi capitis (in the person of Christ the head), while the faithful act as members of the body. Both are rightly called sacrifices, but they are so in different ways.

Thus, when Jesus says that He is ascending to “My Father and your Father,” He does not use the “and of equivalence” but the “and of comparison.” As a man, Jesus can speak of God as His Father, but His human nature is hypostatically united to His divine nature as God, the Second Person of the Trinity. So, although God is our Father and Christ’s Father, He is Christ’s Father in a far richer and more profound way.

Jesus says, “My God and your God” not by way of equivalence, but by way of comparison.

In all these ways, the Lord Jesus must ascend in our understanding. He will do that provided we do not go on clinging to Him in a merely human and familiar way.

Let the Lord ascend in your life.



TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; History; Theology
KEYWORDS: catholic; jesusascension; jesusresurrection; marymagdalene
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last
Video
1 posted on 04/23/2019 9:57:52 AM PDT by Salvation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway; NYer; ELS; Pyro7480; livius; ArrogantBustard; Catholicguy; RobbyS; marshmallow; ...

Monsignor Pope Ping!


2 posted on 04/23/2019 9:59:29 AM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Thus us really a lot of overthinking here.


3 posted on 04/23/2019 10:12:28 AM PDT by freepertoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

That she is a bitter clinger?


4 posted on 04/23/2019 10:21:33 AM PDT by 2banana (Were you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

I always simply took it to mean he was telling her basically, “Don’t get too attached, I won’t be sticking around in my physical form.”


5 posted on 04/23/2019 10:23:59 AM PDT by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

There is one verse which I cannot recall at the moment where one of his disciples (Thomas?) wants to touch him but Jesus says that his body has not completed it’s transformation yet.


6 posted on 04/23/2019 10:30:50 AM PDT by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepertoo
"Thus us really a lot of overthinking here."

Roger that. A clear case of reading into the text rather than drawing out it.

7 posted on 04/23/2019 10:37:49 AM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
The key paragraph is this:

In effect, Jesus is saying to Mary, “Don’t go on clinging to what in Me is familiar to you. Step back, take a good look, and then go tell my brothers what you see.”

The remarkable thing for me, personally, is that this is the FIRST time I’ve ever agreed with you.

8 posted on 04/23/2019 10:38:16 AM PDT by Ken Regis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: apillar; Salvation

Yes, I also thought of it in the simpler manner. Glad to have read this interpretation.

Thanks for the ping, Salvation.


9 posted on 04/23/2019 10:45:51 AM PDT by Bigg Red (Beta Male O'Rourke is a fake Mexican.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

A resurrected Jesus was absolutely pure and could not be touched by a living human. I am confident once the soul is safely in Heaven, there will be plenty of hugs and affection.


10 posted on 04/23/2019 11:30:47 AM PDT by Midwesterner53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: circlecity; freepertoo
"Thus us really a lot of overthinking here." <<<

Roger that. A clear case of reading into the text rather than drawing out it.

Well what I drew out of the article is this...

Mary actively sees Jesus but passively needs to receive something new about Him. This is the middle voice, containing elements of both the active and the passive.

... because the concept of the Golden Ratio is one of ideal proportions, balance. In Hebrew it's יחס הזהב, which has a sum of 97, same as "son of man" [בן אדם] and time [זמן] among other things. 97 is the traditional age at which Jacob was named Israel (in year 2205) because as a prince he had power with God and with men, and prevailed.

I discover something new every day, although not in the way authors intend. Make this stuff work for you. After all, the Son of Man is the Lord of the Sabbath, not the other way around. :)

11 posted on 04/23/2019 11:33:36 AM PDT by Ezekiel (The pun is mightier than the s-word.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: yarddog
There is one verse which I cannot recall at the moment where one of his disciples (Thomas?) wants to touch him but Jesus says that his body has not completed it’s transformation yet.

Still in a state of flux.

12 posted on 04/23/2019 11:57:05 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (A working definition of the new "Elite" would be; "Those who matter to those who think they matter.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts

Yes, it was something like that.


13 posted on 04/23/2019 12:26:32 PM PDT by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts

Then he said to Thomas, “Put your finger here; see my hands. Reach out your hand and put it into my side. Stop doubting and believe.”

Why would Jesus ask Thomas to touch him if Thomas was going to get zapped or whatever? Jesus ate bread with them, walked on the ground (as well as appearing in rooms with locked doors). He had a body.

I agree on the more simple view of don’t get too attached as I’ll be leaving. Of course later, Jesus says we’ll have something even BETTER! The Holy Spirit!!


14 posted on 04/23/2019 12:35:56 PM PDT by 21twelve (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Ken Regis

I simply do not agree.

First The Lord wants us to cling to Him.

Second, although the Lord was no longer dead He had not been resurrected per SE. He was like Lazarus, alive but not resurrected. It was customary for Jews to not touch the dead, if you did you were considered unclean. Perhaps the risen Lord was protecting Mary. He had not had His body changed yet to it’s glorified condition, He had not risen but soon would.

When He came back after that He invited His Apostles to touch Him. He invites all of us to “cling” if you will to Him.

He lives, He is not the walking dead.


15 posted on 04/23/2019 12:39:15 PM PDT by JAKraig (my religion is at least as good as yours)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
COMMENTARY: 'First, we should set aside certain previous translations that rendered “Do not cling to me” as “Do not touch me.”' (Msgr. Charles Pope)

"Do not touch me" is not a previous translation; "Do not cling" is the previous translation. I own both translations, and I checked.

From a sensual perspective, "cling" is an intimate, passionate gesture of commitment. "Touch" could mean many things. It's like the difference between "holding hands" and "shaking hands."

16 posted on 04/23/2019 12:40:07 PM PDT by Ace's Dad (Trump in 2020!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Midwesterner53

What do you do with Thomas?


17 posted on 04/23/2019 1:23:27 PM PDT by Ken Regis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JAKraig

Neither do I.
Have a nice day.


18 posted on 04/23/2019 1:26:17 PM PDT by Ken Regis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Midwesterner53

The same Jesus encouraged Thomas to touch Him and verify His wounds just hours later so that cannot be what He meant


19 posted on 04/23/2019 1:34:23 PM PDT by Mom MD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: freepertoo
Thus us really a lot of overthinking here.

No kidding. That keen mind of his can obviously be put to better, more constructive uses.


20 posted on 04/23/2019 2:45:25 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson