Posted on 03/30/2019 8:12:59 AM PDT by Salvation
Question: I had reason to hope my niece was going to convert to the Catholic faith. But there were so many obstacles the Church set up that discouraged her. She was asked to go to classes, and they told her that her marriage was not valid and she would need an annulment. Further, it was necessary to wait until Easter, etc. The nearby evangelical church set up no such obstacles, and she was able to join at once and be considered a member. I hear so much talk of evangelization today, but I share my niece’s frustration. Can we not streamline this process?
— Name withheld
Answer: There is a kind of appealing simplicity that you describe in many Protestant denominations. But there are problems with the approach that should give us pause. Ultimately evangelization is more about conversion than mere membership. We are summoned to embrace the saving teaching of the Lord and to walk according to it.
Because adults make informed decisions, the Church considers it important to teach them the fundamentals of the Faith so that they can know what it is they are agreeing to when they enter the Church. Although some of the Scriptures portray an almost instant, on-the-spot baptism, the consensus in the early Church shifted to a lengthy, three-year period of instruction (called the catechumenate) prior to baptism. This likely was because of the insight that quick conversions often led to quick departures or a falling away when the true demands of discipleship became known.
Instructions are most insisted upon for those who are unbaptized. In the case of those who are baptized and come from different Protestant denominations, the length and content of instructions will depend on their background. It is up to the discretion of the pastor who discerns with each individual what is needed. It is certainly not required for those already baptized to “wait until next Easter.”
The concerns about a person’s marital status are rooted in the very words and teachings of Jesus himself. He teaches without ambiguity that for a person to marry, then divorce and enter another marriage, puts them in an ongoing state of adultery in the “new” marriage (cf. Mt 5:32; Mt 19:1-9; Mk 10:11-12; Lk 16:18, etc). He adds rather firmly, “What God has joined together, let no one divide” (Mt 19:9).
It will be further noted that when the Lord was evangelizing the woman at the well, he brought her to a moment of conversion, and she asked for the gift of faith. But the Lord Jesus saw fit to first raise with her the fact that she had been married five times and was now living with a man outside of marriage. Her conversion would not be complete or adequate until she was willing to live chastely. Then the graces could flow.
For reasons of their own, many Protestant denominations have decided to practically overlook such passages. But the Catholic Church takes the Lord’s teaching on these matters rather seriously, as he clearly intended that we should. In some cases, after an investigation based on evidence, the Church may use its power to bind and loose, to indicate that the previous marriage was not “what God has joined,” and it recognizes the first marriage as null. A person’s current marriage then can be blessed and recognized. But we simply cannot set the Lord’s words aside as if they were of little importance.
Thus some conversions to the Catholic faith will take some time to be faithful to the teachings of the Lord and the nature of true conversion. It is worth the diligence required.
Mortal sins kill and those who commit them will not inherit the Kingdom of God. That is why it is so very important to have witnesses and not bear false witness against another. It is a very grave sin, as is fornication (porneia). Anyone committing fornication or bearing false witness are in danger of Gehenna (”hell”).
***
So, will you stop with the ‘you think you’re saved because you believe you’re saved’ nonsense, considering that since you’ve been corrected REPEATEDLY, it would be false witness to claim so?
I still am quite confused as to what you’re trying to argue other than that sins are sins and we need the grace of God.
Let me reply to you with something else, however.
“27 You have heard that it was said, You shall not commit adultery. 28 But I say to you that everyone who looks at a woman with lustful intent has already committed adultery with her in his heart.”
How many mortal sins do you commit daily?
Too many plural pronouns in there to accept as valid comments.
***
How about you stop with the nonsense then, since all of us have rejected your ‘you’re saved because you think you’re saved’ implied accusations.
Personally I don’t believe in all the theology that in modern times is deemed ‘dispensationalism’ but most of what I’ve confessed rhymes, you could say.
The biggest differences involving a subtle distinction between what grace and faith are, and what the nature of Jesus returning will be.
At least as far as I’ve studied.
Cathechism...
I. JUSTIFICATION
1987 The grace of the Holy Spirit has the power to justify us, that is, to cleanse us from our sins and to communicate to us “the righteousness of God through faith in Jesus Christ” and through Baptism:34
But if we have died with Christ, we believe that we shall also live with him. For we know that Christ being raised from the dead will never die again; death no longer has dominion over him. The death he died he died to sin, once for all, but the life he lives he lives to God. So you also must consider yourselves as dead to sin and alive to God in Christ Jesus.35
1988 Through the power of the Holy Spirit we take part in Christ’s Passion by dying to sin, and in his Resurrection by being born to a new life; we are members of his Body which is the Church, branches grafted onto the vine which is himself:36
[God] gave himself to us through his Spirit. By the participation of the Spirit, we become communicants in the divine nature. . . . For this reason, those in whom the Spirit dwells are divinized.37
1989 The first work of the grace of the Holy Spirit is conversion, effecting justification in accordance with Jesus’ proclamation at the beginning of the Gospel: “Repent, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.”38 Moved by grace, man turns toward God and away from sin, thus accepting forgiveness and righteousness from on high. “Justification is not only the remission of sins, but also the sanctification and renewal of the interior man.39
1990 Justification detaches man from sin which contradicts the love of God, and purifies his heart of sin. Justification follows upon God’s merciful initiative of offering forgiveness. It reconciles man with God. It frees from the enslavement to sin, and it heals.
1991 Justification is at the same time the acceptance of God’s righteousness through faith in Jesus Christ. Righteousness (or “justice”) here means the rectitude of divine love. With justification, faith, hope, and charity are poured into our hearts, and obedience to the divine will is granted us.
1992 Justification has been merited for us by the Passion of Christ who offered himself on the cross as a living victim, holy and pleasing to God, and whose blood has become the instrument of atonement for the sins of all men. Justification is conferred in Baptism, the sacrament of faith. It conforms us to the righteousness of God, who makes us inwardly just by the power of his mercy. Its purpose is the glory of God and of Christ, and the gift of eternal life:40
But now the righteousness of God has been manifested apart from law, although the law and the prophets bear witness to it, the righteousness of God through faith in Jesus Christ for all who believe. For there is no distinction: since all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, they are justified by his grace as a gift, through the redemption which is in Christ Jesus, whom God put forward as an expiation by his blood, to be received by faith. This was to show God’s righteousness, because in his divine forbearance he had passed over former sins; it was to prove at the present time that he himself is righteous and that he justifies him who has faith in Jesus.41
1993 Justification establishes cooperation between God’s grace and man’s freedom. On man’s part it is expressed by the assent of faith to the Word of God, which invites him to conversion, and in the cooperation of charity with the prompting of the Holy Spirit who precedes and preserves his assent:
When God touches man’s heart through the illumination of the Holy Spirit, man himself is not inactive while receiving that inspiration, since he could reject it; and yet, without God’s grace, he cannot by his own free will move himself toward justice in God’s sight.42
1994 Justification is the most excellent work of God’s love made manifest in Christ Jesus and granted by the Holy Spirit. It is the opinion of St. Augustine that “the justification of the wicked is a greater work than the creation of heaven and earth,” because “heaven and earth will pass away but the salvation and justification of the elect . . . will not pass away.”43 He holds also that the justification of sinners surpasses the creation of the angels in justice, in that it bears witness to a greater mercy.
1995 The Holy Spirit is the master of the interior life. By giving birth to the “inner man,”44 justification entails the sanctification of his whole being:
Just as you once yielded your members to impurity and to greater and greater iniquity, so now yield your members to righteousness for sanctification. . . . But now that you have been set free from sin and have become slaves of God, the return you get is sanctification and its end, eternal life.45
I’m not quoting, I’m pointing out your implications and using single-quotes for the summary of the argument you’re making.
“If I was quoting I would use double quotes like this.”
And besides, I have to wonder, if you weren’t implying that we believe that ‘saved because you think you’re saved’ nonsense, why did you keep arguing against it even after we told you that we don’t believe that, hmm?
At the moment, it seems that either you’re tilting at a strawman that has no relevance to the people that you’re posting to—which means that you’re a poor debater—or you DID actually intend to accuse us of that nonsense.
Which one is it?
So, were you accusing us of believing that ‘one is saved because one believes one is saved’ or were you attacking a strawman that had no relevance to the argument?
Both of which would fall under the realm of you speaking FALSEHOODS.
So which is it?
You remain joyously ignorant and clueless. But that is not unexpected, since the natural man receiveth not the things of God.
Single or double quotes attribute those exact words. In this cases they were false quotations attributed to another.
***
Right, because you can read my mind and tell exactly what my intentions are better than I can.
I already told you what I meant; now stop telling falsehoods about me.
Both of which would fall under the realm of you speaking FALSEHOODS.
False
***
True.
Because if you’re tilting at strawmen, that’s classic deception techniques, and if you’re accusing us especially after being corrected, that’s lying.
Or, perhaps, you just didn’t read what we had to say.
Who knows? I’m not you; I can’t mind-read the opposition. All I can do is tell you what it looks like you’re doing.
Ephesians 1:10 In the dispensation of the fulness of times, to re-establish all things in Christ, that are in heaven and on earth, in him.
Ephesians 3:2 If yet you have heard of the dispensation of the grace of God which is given me towards you:
Ephesians 3:9 And to enlighten all men, that they may see what is the dispensation of the mystery which hath been hidden from eternity in God, who created all things:
Colossians 1:25 Whereof I am made a minister according to the dispensation of God, which is given me towards you, that I may fulfill the word of God:
I'm really curious how your religion dismisses these scriptures. You don't have to remain ignorant. Unless it is too much to awaken from the religiousness trance.
BTW, dude, all the quotes are from the DR version ...
Consider that the modern theory of Dispensationalism is wrong.
If you do not think you are:
In the garden of Eden
In the time of Noah
A Jew of Israel under the theocratic kingdom
In heaven now
...then you too are a dispensationist.
Enjoy!
Consider that the modern practice of Catholicism is wrong.
It in NO way matches what the Church Leaders wrote down in Acts 15.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.