Posted on 01/10/2019 8:11:47 AM PST by SeekAndFind
Andy Stanley preaches to an estimated 33,000 people every Sunday at North Point Ministries' five metro-Atlanta campuses. | Photo courtesy of North Point Ministries
Christians should quit erecting Ten Commandments displays and should instead consider making monuments dedicated to the Sermon on the Mount, popular pastor Andy Stanley said.
In a column published by Relevant Magazine, the North Point Community Church pastor argued that the Ten Commandments are the old covenant and no longer apply to believers.
"[I]f were going to create a monument to stand as a testament to our faith, shouldnt it at least be a monument of something that actually applies to us?" he posed.
Participants in the new covenant (thats Christians) are not required to obey any of the commandments found in the first part of their Bibles, wrote Stanley. Participants in the new covenant are expected to obey the single command Jesus issued as part of his new covenant: as I have loved you, so you must love one another.
This new commandment is "a replacement for everything in the existing list. Including the big ten," he maintained. "Just as his new covenant replaced the old covenant, Jesus new commandment replaced all the old commandments."
Stanley went on to say that he believed so much of the evils committed by churches over history were connected to them trying to mix aspects of the old covenant with Christianity and that although Jesus was foreshadowed in the old covenant, he did not come to extend it.
Dear Christian reader: Why? Why? Why would we even be tempted to reach back beyond the cross to borrow from a covenant that was temporary and inferior to the covenant established for us at Calvary? Stanley continued.
The author of Hebrews says it best. Jesus was the guarantor of a better covenant (Hebrews 7:22). Later he writes, the new covenant is established on better promises. Besides, you werent included in the old covenant to begin with! So why are we fighting to build monuments to it?
Stanley's comments echo the arguments he made in his recent book, Irresistible: Reclaiming the New that Jesus Unleashed for the World, which was released last September.
In the book, Stanley spoke about "old covenant leftovers," stating that he believed Christians had "an uncomfortable history and habit of selectively rebranding aspects of God's covenant with Israel and smuggling them into the ekklesia of Jesus."
Stanley wrote that while the covenant God made with ancient Israel was "divinely ordained," it was also "temporary," adding, "Careless mixing and matching of old and new covenant values and imperatives make the current version of our faith unnecessarily resistible."
Last year, Stanley garnered controversy when he argued in an April sermon that Christians should unhitch themselves from the Old Testament.
To justify this, Stanley cited Acts 15, which described how early church leaders decided that Gentile converts did not need to strictly observe Jewish law to become Christians.
"[First century] Church leaders unhitched the church from the worldview, value system, and regulations of the Jewish scriptures," preached Stanley. "Peter, James, Paul elected to unhitch the Christian faith from their Jewish scriptures, and my friends, we must as well.
He argued that what launched Christianity was the resurrection of Jesus, not the Jewish scriptures.
Many, including Messianic Jewish author and radio personality Michael Brown, have denounced Stanley's unhitch comments.
"A pastor as influential as Andy Stanley needs to distance himself from such heresies, making a public, clear, and unequivocal correction that undoes the confusion he has caused. (He knows that I write this [as] a friend, out to help, not to hurt.)," wrote Brown in a column last year.
"He can preach against legalism and against Judaizing, exalting the grace of God and celebrating the newness of the New Covenant, without undermining the very foundations on which that New Covenant is established."
Ray Ortlund, senior pastor of Immanuel Church in Nashville, Tennessee, and the president of Renewal Ministries, also denounced Stanleys views in a speech at the Gospel Coalition's West Coast Conference last October.
Preaching from 2 Timothy 1:3-8, Ortlund noted that when the Apostle Paul was writing to Timothy, he stressed his religious heritage through Judaism.
"Paul looks back into his own deepest roots. He goes back to David, to Moses, to Abraham. He reveres the faith that came down to him even filtered through Jewish tradition," said Ortlund.
"Unlike some preachers today, Paul did not 'unhitch' the Christian faith from the Old Testament And for him personally, Christian conversion did not take his Jewishness away. It made Jesus the Lord over his Jewishness and over his conscience, both of which, he continues to honor."
For his part, Stanley explained that critics needed to understand the context, especially since his remarks were more for an audience that is turned off by biblical arguments.
"I told my kids growing up, if anyone ever asks you 'do you believe Adam and Eve are real people?' here is how you are to answer: do not say 'yes because the Bible says Adam and Eve were real people,'" commented Stanley in an interview with Michael Brown last July.
"You say this: 'I believe Adam and Eve were historical characters because Jesus did. And when somebody predicts their own death and resurrection and pulls it off, I go with whatever they say.'"
Andy Stanley’s an idiot. Jesus implicitly approved of a questioner following the Ten Commandments — I don’t remember exactly where in the Gospels that was, but it’s there.
Engaging in mind-bending legalisms. This guy would have made a great Pharisee.
Jesus’ TWO (not ONE) great commandments are IN ADDITION to the Ten Commandments, IIRC. This guy is an imbecile, and quite possibly a cult leader as well.
“Funny no mention here of science acknowledging the existence of Eve, as well as humanity genetically descending from just two original humans, thus proving the Bible correct via that route.”
My own position is that science still has some catching up to do, as it is not yet advanced enough to understand that the Bible is correct.
“Isnt one of the commands to remember the Sabbath “
It is. It was pertinent in the Old Testament, but not pertinent after Christ’s death and the coming of the Holy Spirit. It is not “a thing” in the New Testament, and the only Commandment not repeated in the N.T., when salvation wasn’t via law any more, but strictly by grace through faith.
So long as you love all your victims. );-)
No, the message is the same. There was a change in circumstances but God does NOT change.
“Engaging in mind-bending legalisms. This guy would have made a great Pharisee.”
“For I say unto you, that except your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no wise enter into the kingdom of heaven.” Matthew 5:20
never trust anyone with two first names.
God didn't change it. Don't blame God for what the people fail to do.
And in that passage, Jesus said the law would pass away when all was fulfilled. He fulfilled it.
When Jesus declared the New Covenant, the old passed away.
Hebrews 8:13 "In that He says, 'A new covenant,' He has made the first obsolete."
Likewise, when Jesus gave us a New Commandment in John 13:34, the old passed away. When Paul says we died and were delivered from the law (Rom 7:6), his example of the law is the Tenth Commandment (Rom 7:7).
What I find astonishing is the lack of knowledge of New Testament Commandments, such as: (where the word 'command' or 'commandment' is used)
Acts 17:30
John 13:34
1 John 3:23 (the New Testament version of the great commandment)
1 Cor 7:10-11
1 Cor 14:37
1 Thess 4:2-8
1 Cor 9:14
There are more.
So he wants to set the bar even higher?
The Ten Commandments are good reminders for unbelievers.
We need to keep them up.
I think there is a big difference between the Ten Commandments and Jewish ritual law. One is like God’s constitution and the others are Talmudic laws concerning Jewish rituals and lifestyle.
Matthew 7:15-20 New International Version (NIV)
15 Watch out for false prophets. They come to you in sheeps clothing, but inwardly they are ferocious wolves. 16 By their fruit you will recognize them. Do people pick grapes from thornbushes, or figs from thistles? 17 Likewise, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. 18 A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, and a bad tree cannot bear good fruit. 19 Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. 20 Thus, by their fruit you will recognize them.”
All I need to know.
1 Therefore there is now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus.2 For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus has set you free from the law of sin and of death.
3 For what the Law could not do, weak as it was through the flesh, God did: sending His own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh and as an offering for sin, He condemned sin in the flesh,
4 so that the requirement of the Law might be fulfilled in us, who do not walk according to the flesh but according to the Spirit.
Noting that accepting Jesus as Lord and Savior is key to salvation, Luke 18:18-25, particularly verse 20, shows that Jesus indicated that the commandments are still very important in a Christians life.
Which commandments don’t still apply today, Andy?
You have the wrong god there. He's talking about the Judeo-Christian God, not the muslim god, allah.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.